WRITING ASSIGNMENT #4: The “How America’s Food Giants Swallowed The Family Farms” Article And How It Connects With Other Of Our Themes
IAH 206 WHFS
WRITING ASSIGNMENT #4: The “How America’s Aliment Giants Swallowed the Family Farms” commodity and how it connects with alternative of our themes
Insert in the bead box for Autograph Assignment #4 on D2L.
As acclaimed on the syllabus: 300-400 words
The adventure in “How America’s Aliment Giants Swallowed the Family Farms” has access to assorted of our readings, which is not hasty in that assorted of the claims, thesis, account that we are exploring in this advance accept interconnections. Sometimes these are causal connections, and ancient they are conceptual connections; in any case, it is advantageous to anticipate about them together.
Write an commodity in which you explain how the adventure laid out in the Guardian article
can be analyzed in agreement of, or contrarily affiliated to, at atomic two of the following:
(1) the assay accustomed by Holt-Gimenez and Patel in Aliment Rebellions
(2) the assay of “sustainability” discussed by Paul Thompson
(3) the account of “locality” discussed in Thompson and DeLind
(4) account about aliment ascendancy as discussed in the Wittman, et al. article
Note that you get to accept the affair or theses to be discussed here, but you should be abiding to accept these in a way that shows an compassionate of what’s important about all this.
You get to accept which alternative capacity [(1)-(4)] to accomplish use of in your assay (and appropriately what alternative readings to accomplish use of), but don’t accept that it will assignment out appropriately able-bodied with any two of them. Give some anticipation aboriginal to which ones you anticipate accommodate absorbing acumen or absolutely affix to what you appetite to say.
It is not appropriate that you do an argument and reply. The acumen for this is that I appetite you to focus on the assignment of anecdotic access and fleshing them out so that they are bright and significant. (It’s accessible that you’ll acquisition that an objection-reply action will in actuality advice you do this, but again, it is not required.)
As before: Citations are required; quotations are not. Quotations, if you accept them, should not be long, and they don’t calculation against the chat count. (See accepted description of the autograph assignments on the syllabus.) I wouldn’t apprehend you to use any sources alfresco of the chic readings. Of advance you do accept to adduce the Guardian commodity and the readings you use to chase the aloft instructions. The appearance for accomplishing the citations? You can aloof adduce the folio cardinal in the afterward way: (Thompson, p. X).
Order a unique copy of this paper