WORLD CULTURE PAPER

3-5 PAGES !!!! IN 24 HOUR!! MY TOPIC :Comparing Sculptures of Age-old India and Greece. Assignment 2: Activity Cardboard – Allusive Essay Due Week 7 and account 200 points This  “Assignment 2” autograph appointment is a allusive article focused on  topics encountered in our HUM 111 class. The activity will be based on  research but will reflect your angle and estimation of the  topic. This activity is advised to advice you amplitude your apperception and your  abilities as an organized, innovative, and analytical thinker. If  approached properly, it should additionally be fun! Choose one (1) of the  topics from the account of affair choices below. Read the affair carefully.  Write a three to four (3-4) folio cardboard (750-1,000 words) that follows  instructions and covers anniversary allotment of the topic. (The appellation folio and  References account do not get included in this chat count). Note: Your adviser may crave you to abide your affair best for approval afore the end of Week 5. For the affair you choose: Establish  a bright apriorism about your affair as allotment of the anterior branch  (often the apriorism is the aftermost affair one determines afterwards accomplishing the basal  research and outline; about it will be placed in the aboriginal branch  of your paper). This is a allusive essay. Allegory  approached appropriately will crave some analytical cerebration on your part.  Use a point-by-point access for the essay. That means, if comparing  subject A with accountable B, don't do the aboriginal bisected of the article on  subject A and again the added bisected on accountable B--that will assume like two  (2) abstracted essays and comparisons will tend to get lost. Instead, you  should be advertence both capacity in best of your paragraphs as you  compare them throughout the essay. Comparisons will assay  similarities as able-bodied as contrasts. Do not try to do aggregate  on your two (2) subjects. You should end up absorption your focus to a  few insights and issues about the capacity actuality compared. And, from  those adequately specific credibility of comparison, you will advance a apriorism  and accumulate some lessons. Follow carefully the instructions beneath for your specific topic. Include  a absolute branch at the end. This branch will, in some way,  refer aback to the apriorism accustomed in your aboriginal paragraph, back now  you accept accustomed and accurate it. It may be actuality that you additionally  include your observations apropos your abstraction to the avant-garde abode or  society (see your topic). Try to accomplishment with flair! Use at atomic three (3) acceptable affection bookish sources, with one (1) antecedent actuality the chic text. Note: Wikipedia  and alternative agnate Websites do not authorize as bookish resources. You  are awful encouraged to use the Resource Center tab at the top of your  Blackboard page. Topic Choices – Choose aloof one (1) of the capacity below: Qualities of the Hero: Comparing Gilgamesh and Odysseus.  Write an article comparing these two (2) ballsy abstracts from age-old  epics of altered cultures, abnormally absorption your assay on the  sources about their encounters with monsters: Gilgamesh encounters the  monster attention the forest, Humbaba, in Tablets 3-5 of the Epic of Gilgamesh (see http://www.ancienttexts.org/library/mesopotamian/gilgamesh/;  scroll bottomward to the Tablet links; anticipate of "Tablet" numbers like affiliate  numbers)." Odysseus encounters Polyphemus the Cyclops in Book 9 of The Odyssey (see http://www.theoi.com/Text/HomerOdyssey9.html; from band 105 to the end). Your cardboard should:   a)  Compare Gilgamesh and Odysseus as to their ballsy qualities, acquainted  similarities and differences, application specific examples from the epics. b)  Summarize what this indicates about differences amid age-old  Mesopotamian and Greek cultures in their belief and expectations. c)  From this comparison, advance means that accepted cultural belief and  expectations appearance avant-garde notions about role models and heroes. Confucius and Aristotle on Virtue.  Write an article comparing these two (2) age-old thinkers on the abstraction  of advantage or acceptable ethical appearance and conduct. Stay focused on the  issue; accumulate any biographical or alternative advice abbreviate or limited. As  much as possible, assay their writings (in translation, of course),  using Confucius' Analects (at http://classics.mit.edu/Confucius/analects.html ) and Aristotle's Nicomachean Belief (at http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html ). Your cardboard should: a)  Compare the article of Confucius and Aristotle on what constitutes  virtue or acceptable ethical appearance and conduct, acquainted similarities and  differences in specific account or emphasis. b) Consider what your allegation advance about differences amid age-old Chinese and age-old Greek culture. c) From this comparison, advance account of advantage that can administer to belief in a avant-garde setting, such as a assorted workplace.    Comparing Sculptures of Age-old India and Greece.  Write an article comparing the way gods and bodies were depicted in  sculpture in age-old India and Greece, and assay the cultural ethics  and belief that these art works reflect in anniversary case. Your cardboard should:        a) Application specific  examples, analyze the way gods and bodies were depicted in the  sculptures of age-old India and Greece, acquainted similarities and  differences. b) Assay the cultural ethics and belief that these art works reflect for anniversary society.   c)  From this comparison, advance a avant-garde bearings of aesthetic announcement  and the means it reflects or counters prevailing cultural values.    Comparing Age-old Skeptics.  Write an article comparing Lucretius and Wang Chong (=Wang Ch'ung),  skeptical philosophers of age-old Rome and China. They were agnostic  about accepted religious and airy behavior and widely-held  superstitions. Lucretius was an Epicurean philosopher of Roman ability  (Chapter 6). Wang Ch'ung was a thinker in age-old Chinese ability  (Chapter 7). Focus your allegory on their writings as begin at http://www.humanistictexts.org/lucretius.htm and http://www.humanistictexts.org/wangchung.htm#On Not Flying to Heaven. Your cardboard should: a)  Using examples from their writings, analyze these two (2) thinkers on  their angle about specific capacity and on their access in answer  and cogent their skepticism. b) From this comparison, assay accepted behavior in anniversary ability that assume agnate and those that assume different. c)  From this comparison, advance any avant-garde bearings in which agnostic  skeptics accost airy and religious beliefs, and animadversion on the  considerations of chargeless announcement and cultural respect.      Comparing Age-old Male Rulers.  Take any two (2) of these rulers and address an article comparing them:  Ramses II, Shihuangdi, Constantine, Ashoka, Pericles, or Charlemagne.  Select rulers from altered cultures. You may additionally adduce (for  approval or not) a adjudicator not listed. Avoid diffuse commendation or diffuse  close apery from biographical sources. Make it YOUR allusive  analysis. Your cardboard should: a)  Compare the two (2) rulers in agreement of their bearings and methods of  rule and their credible belief and practices, acquainted similarities and  differences. Use specific examples. b)  Consider what your abstraction suggests about the cultures over which they  ruled, anecdotic any similarities and differences amid the  cultures. c) From this comparison,  suggest acquaint about altered types of able administration in the  world of avant-garde business and / or avant-garde politics.    Comparing Age-old Changeable Rulers.  Compare the Tang Empress Wu Zetian (also accepted as Empress Wu or as Wu  Zhao; disqualified China about 690-705 AD) with either the Pharaoh Cleopatra  (ruled Egypt about 51-31 BC) or the Pharaoh Hatshepsut (ruled Egypt  around 1478-1458 BC). You may additionally adduce (for approval or not) a  female adjudicator not listed. Avoid diffuse commendation or diffuse abutting  paraphrasing from biographical sources. Make it YOUR allusive  analysis. Your cardboard should: a)  Compare the two (2) rulers in agreement of their bearings and ascendance to  power, their methods of rule, and their achievements and  resourcefulness, acquainted similarities and differences. Use specific  examples. b) Consider what your abstraction  suggests about the cultures over which they ruled, anecdotic any  similarities and differences amid the cultures. c)  From this comparison, advance acquaint about altered types of  effective administration by a changeable in the apple of avant-garde business and /  or avant-garde politics.    Other affair best application a  comparative access (proposed by apprentice or instructor) and accustomed by  the assistant and accurate by the allocation rubric.   The Activity Cardboard will be graded on: The akin to which the instructions were followed for the cardboard about and for the specific topic. The enactment of a bright apriorism about your topic. The capability and appliance of information, examples, and capacity which abutment the accepted thesis. Covering  each allotment of the affair as instructed, including the comparisons, the  consideration of age-old cultural differences, and the absorption on  lessons for avant-garde association or the avant-garde workplace. The affection of your analysis and your ability application analytical reasoning. The  use and accepting of a minimum of three (3) appropriate references  (the chic arbiter added at atomic two (2) alternative affection bookish  sources) accurate application the APA appearance –including both the use of a  proper References account and the use of able in-text citations. Adherence to accepted rules of grammar, punctuation, paragraphing, and mechanics, and accepted accuracy of presentation. Your appointment charge chase these formatting requirements: Be  typed, bifold spaced, application Times New Roman chantry (size 12), with  one-inch margins on all sides. Both in-text citations and a References  list are required. Citations and references charge chase APA appearance  format. Check with your assistant for any added instructions  specific to the called topic. (Note: Students can acquisition APA appearance abstracts amid in the advance carapace for guidance). Include  a awning folio absolute the appellation of the assignment, the student’s  name, the professor’s name, the advance title, and the date. The awning  page and the advertence folio are not included in the appropriate folio  length. For our purposes, you may omit any abstruse page. The specific advance acquirements outcomes associated with this appointment are: Explain how key social, cultural, and aesthetic contributions accord to actual changes. Explain the accent of situating a society’s cultural and aesthetic expressions aural a actual context. Examine  the influences of intellectual, religious, political, and  socio-economic armament on social, cultural, and aesthetic expressions. Identify above actual developments in apple cultures during the eras of antique to the Renaissance. Use technology and advice assets to analysis issues in the abstraction of apple cultures. Write acutely and concisely about apple cultures application able autograph mechanics.

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal
Order now and a get a 25% discount with the discount code: COURSEGUYOrder Now!
+ +