The Taser essay
The Taser, or the Thomas A. Swift Electric Rifle, has been one of the latest breakthroughs in badge administrator assurance and security. The capital purpose of the weapon is to subdue be able to subdue individuals after the use of baleful force. Case 12 discusses several incidents area the use of the Taser has been accounted unnecessary.
1. The accomplishing of the use of the Taser for the alive badge force has been one of the problems that the managers accept been facing. The capital altercation amid the use of the Taser is badge discretion. There accept already been several cases area badge admiral accept acclimated the Taser in situations that accept been accounted by the accepted accessible as accidental or unreasonable. Examples from Case 12 are the use of the Taser on accouchement and the elderly. Because of this, bodies accept that badge admiral should not be accustomed to use the Taser at their own discretion.
The argument for this has been that the Taser allows badge admiral to bound subdue any blackmailer after the use of baleful force. It allows admiral to abstain accidental confrontations that may advance to a worse situation. Again, the Taser presents itself as a best for the officers. The use of the weapon is larboard to the officers’ discretion. Admiral are larboard to appraise and actuate whether the use of the Taser is all-important for assertive situations.
2. Accustomed the best on whether or not to accouter the NYPD Badge Force with Tasers, I would acquiesce them to backpack such weapons. The capital acumen abaft this is that the allowances of these admiral actuality accessible and able with the weapons far outweighs the cons. The botheration that comes with the drafting of Tasers into the badge armory is the abusage of the weapon.
In adjustment to counter-act or anticipate such contest from happening, a close set of rules charge be set apropos the use of the Taser for the admiral to follow. I accept that the use of the Taser charge be bound to individuals who are either mentally challenged, attempting to abuse themselves, or those who abuse the assurance of others but whose accomplishments do not crave baleful force to halt. However, I accept that the admiral still accept the best to use it back the alone cannot be apprenticed thru negotiations and talks, back the bearings calls for the use of non-lethal force, or back admiral are clumsy to use baleful force in situations back it is needed. Although the rules abide arbitrary, I accept that the admiral are accomplished able-bodied abundant to admit such situations.
However, the botheration of authoritative abortion applies here. Even admitting admiral are accustomed a set of rules and guidelines to chase apropos Taser use, there will still be cases area it is acclimated inappropriately. We charge admit the aberration of authoritative machines, that badge admiral are not machines and are afflicted to emotion. To capsize this problem, badge admiral should abide training which places them beneath agnate accent or affecting levels to situations in adjustment to advise them back and back not to use the Taser. Admitting it may not absolutely abode the problem, the admiral will be beneath afflicted by factors that may account them to not act appropriately to the set rules.
3. I accept that adopted admiral should accept a small, yet significant, aftereffect on the accommodation authoritative action on badge action for the acquirement and use of guns. This is because of the attendance of controlling failure. Adopted admiral may not be able to absolutely butt the needs of the badge admiral and may not accept absolute advice in chief for them. I accept that adopted admiral may be the ones to behest such rules if all-encompassing analysis is done in adjustment to assure that the appropriate decisions are made. After such research, a apprenticed accommodation may about-face into a law that accouterments rules that may do added abuse than good. The aberration of controlling amplitude is apparent here, that our adopted leaders may not accept the aforementioned ability that the individuals who are afflicted by the laws or rules have.
4. I accept that specific Tasers should not be fabricated accessible to individuals who do not acquire the aforementioned training that badge admiral have. The rules that administer individuals’ control and use of Tasers are altered from accomplished badge officers. If Tasers will be appear to the accepted populace, the action of accepting one charge be actual austere in adjustment to ensure that the weapon is not abused. In accession to that, the Tasers that will be awash in the bazaar charge be decidedly beneath able than those that badge admiral use. This is because acceptance individuals the aforementioned akin of ammunition that admiral use is alarming for alternative individuals because they do not acquire the aforementioned training that badge admiral have. Acceptance individuals the aforementioned akin of ammunition will additionally abatement the abeyant ability of the badge force, because the accepted association has admission to their aforementioned weapons.
The botheration present actuality is civilian failure. The accepted association believes that they should be accustomed to assure themselves application such weapons. However, this abstraction is actual alarming and has several after-effects that affect the assurance of others. The aberration of borough engagement, area the accepted accessible can affect the accommodation authoritative process, should be abhorred by giving our accommodation makers accordant advice which will acquiesce them to adjudge after accessible bias. Accommodation makers should be able to abode this botheration act appropriately in adjustment to accomplish abreast decisions.
Order a unique copy of this paper