The Preschool Selection Factors Education Essay

We alive in an age of quality. Every artefact and account charge action quality. Every customer wants to accept it. Aboriginal adolescence affliction and apprenticeship is additionally accepting growing absorption to the accountable through assay and action making. Preschool affection is difficult to ascertain as affection is subjective. However, it is about accustomed and accustomed as the practices and behavior that beforehand absolute adolescent outcomes, adolescent development or academy abode (Moss and Dahlberg, 2008).

Many aboriginal adolescence apprenticeship theories and practices today can be traced aback to aboriginal educators and philosophers who had a affection for the development and apprenticeship of adolescent children. Theories and practices fatigued from individuals such as Johann Comenius, John Locke, Jean Rousseau, William Frobel, John Dewey and Maria Montessori still accept a able attendance in the philosophies, advisory strategies and chic abstracts begin in aboriginal adolescence settings today. While the approaching of apprenticeship for adolescent accouchement will abide to beforehand some axiological behavior will be maintained, as in the accent of the individuality of the child, the amount of comedy and exploration, the acceptation of amusing interactions, the advantage of self-directed activity, and the allowances of botheration analytic and absolute activity adventures (Platz and Arelano, 2011).

There are abounding childcare centres and kindergartens in Singapore alms countless of preschool programs for adolescent children. Parents are besmirched for best and they would appetite the best for their adolescent children. Large calibration of studies on affection aboriginal adolescence programs are available. However, little assay has been done to abstraction factors that accord to parents’ best of a affection preschool program. The purpose of this abstraction is to accept the choices parents fabricated in affiliation to the affection of their called program. Their alternative factors can acquaint advisers the elements of affection preschool affairs admired by parents.

Rationale and ambience of research

Firstly, studies accept apparent that aerial affection preschool apprenticeship can accept significant, positive, and extensive furnishings on children’s abiding development. Yet if such aerial affection programs do not additionally abode the desires and applied needs of families, parents will be beneath acceptable to enrol their accouchement in such programs.

Secondly, preschool is a adeptness for alive parents. It is not abundant to brainwash parents about what they should amount in a preschool program. Their needs and desires should be advised back designing a program.

Thirdly, alternative factors reflect both parents’ perceptions of affection and ambit of preschool access.

Identifying the apparatus of preschool affection is acute but alone insomuch as those elements are attainable or assessable to children. Accouchement charge be enrolled in aerial affection programs to adore the benefits. Parents about adjudge what preschool their accouchement will attend, and not the advisers who abstraction preschool quality. Therefore, it is analytical to accept how parents accept a preschool and what assets admission their decisions.

Research Questions

The assay aims to acknowledgment three assay questions fatigued from the abstract provided below.

Among parents who enrol their accouchement in aboriginal adolescence program, what assets do they use to apprentice about and baddest a program?

What are the alternative factors advised by parents who enrol their accouchement in an aboriginal adolescence program?

To what admeasurement do parents’ alternative factors chronicle to the affection of their children’s aboriginal adolescence affairs quality?

Literature Review

Several studies accept been done to assay and actuate appearance of a affection aboriginal adolescence program. Aboriginal adolescence assay letters the analytical elements of a aerial affection affairs board a developmentally adapted curriculum, an appraisal arrangement that reflects the chic and expectations for children, adaptations to accommodated alone children’s needs and absolute teacher-child interactions that beforehand children’s cocky adjustment and affecting abundance (Schilder et al, 2011). A aerial affection affairs helps facilitate children’s social, emotional, moral and concrete development, as able-bodied as helps appearance their attitudes, beliefs, dispositions and habits (Barnett and Frede, 2010). Aerial affection childcare had absolute furnishings on children’s accent and amusing abilities as able-bodied as algebraic ability, thinking/attention skills, and botheration behaviours (Ceglowski, 2004). An beforehand abstraction by Peisner-Feinberg et al (2001) board affirmation that childcare affection has a abiding aftereffect on children’s cerebral and socioemtoional development. This is accurate by Elliott (2006) affection programs are able predictors of afterwards amusing and educational outcomes. Affection in programs offered to adolescent accouchement appearance affirmation of absolute appulse on their acquirements and adorning process.

There are factors associated with differences in the affection of affliction provided. Assorted researches of abstraction on articulation amid classroom affection and children’s cerebral and amusing development accept been done as cited by Lara-Cinisomo et al (2009). These allegation appearance that college classroom affection is predictive of adolescent cerebral and amusing outcomes. Accouchement who acquaintance college classroom affection do abundant bigger than accouchement in lower-quality aboriginal acquirements environments. Qualities and competencies of aboriginal adolescence educators are important because educators actualize acquirements opportunities (Sheridan et al, 2009). A analytical bureau is the adeptness of agents to admission children’s development and acquirements in a absolute way.

Various studies bond abecedary apprenticeship to classroom affection accept yielded allegory results. Barnett (2002) concludes that the added awful educated, bigger prepared, and bigger compensated agents are added effective, with abate chic sizes and bigger teacher-student ratios consistent in bigger teaching, added alone absorption and beyond cerebral gains. Admitting allegory after-effects in admiration classroom affection and children’s bookish outcomes were apparent by Aboriginal et al (2007) in their abstraction of seven preschool programs. The authors adapted that abecedary affection is circuitous and a simple admeasurement of teachers’ apprenticeship akin may not be a acceptable indicator of classroom quality. Afar from abecedary training and affairs type, teachers’ acumen and behavior are additionally determinants of classroom affection (Lara-Cinisomo et al, 2009). Yet few studies are attainable that attending at teachers’ behavior about how to assignment with accouchement and what types of adventures and ambiance agents should offer.

As key stakeholders in children’s development and education, parents are generally challenged to acquisition a affection affairs that meets their needs and desires. The amount to which parents and aboriginal adolescence affairs providers accede on how accouchement should be cared for is acceptable to admission how parents apperceive the affection of their children’s care. Parents and experts tend to amount the aforementioned qualities in a preschool (Knoche et al, 2006). Accustomed their affecting ties to their children, parents are additionally acceptable to amount alternative elements too (Glenn-Applegate, 2011). Parents accede abounding factors back they baddest a affairs for their adolescent children.

Various factors admission parents’ best of a affection preschool program. For some parents, the aesthetics of the provider is important (Robertson, 2007). Applied considerations such as aperture hours, adjustable use and breadth are advised important (Glenn-Applegate, 2011). Parents arise to accomplish decisions about adolescent affliction based on adolescent characteristics such as attitude (Fox et al, 2001). Accustomed a best of service, notwithstanding, few parents are able of assessing affection indicators such as agents accomplishment and competence, the affairs quality, and outcomes for accouchement (Elliott, 2006). Parents, and not experts who abstraction affairs quality, about adjudge on the preschool affairs their accouchement will attend. It is accordingly analytical to accept how parents accept a preschool and what assets admission their decisions.

It is important to accept parents’ alternative factors for several affidavit as it will acquiesce affairs providers and action makers to bigger accept parents’ needs and priorities and potentially board added adorable options. The choices parents fabricated chronicle to the affection of their called affairs (Glenn-Applegate, 2011). Parents’ viewpoints are accurate and by including these viewpoints in accepted analogue of affection program, affairs providers and experts can bigger accept the childcare mural and admission choices attainable (Ceglowksi, 2004). Determining parents’ alternative acceptance is all-important in accouterment assets for acute consumers of childcare (Gamble, Ewing and Wilhelm, 2009). From a action angle it is admired to apperceive to what admeasurement parents’ attitudes and expectations can be afflicted in means that abutment the use of a preschool affairs (Robertson, 2007). It is important to accede and accept parents’ considerations back authoritative preschool decisions for their children. Their alternative factors can acquaint advisers the analytical elements of preschool affection affairs admired by parents as key stakeholders in their children’s wellbeing.

Research Methodology

The abstraction was conducted to acquisition out the assets acclimated by parents who are enrolling their accouchement in preschool affairs offered by childcare centre and kindergartens, and factors that afflicted their alternative of the preschool program. Two assay forms are of primary interest. Above-mentioned to distribution, the assay forms were vetted by advisers in aboriginal adolescence education. They are the Assets Assay and the Preschool Alternative Questionnaire. Parents were asked which assets they acclimated to apprentice about and baddest a preschool. A account of 10 abeyant sources was provided and parents were asked to beat those that they used. They could additionally address in accession sources they acclimated that were not listed. The Preschool Alternative Assay was advised to appraise parents’ preschool alternative factors. They were asked to amount the accent of 15 agreed factors on a calibration of Not So Important, Very Important, and Best Important. In addition, they were asked to assay the three best important alternative factors they advised back allotment a preschool (open-ended). A qualitative adjustment was acclimated by administering one-on-one account with parents. Bristles questions were asked on base of their best of a preschool program, the affection appearance of a program, the assets they acclimated to acquisition and baddest a preschool, the three best important factors they advised back selecting a preschool program, and their angle and perceptions of the teachers.


A absolute of 25 parents alternate in this study. 15 parents were from one adolescent affliction centre and 5 parents were accompany of the accommodating parents. Another 5 were approached through articulate recommendation. Parents who completed the questionnaires did not participate in the one-on-one interview. Likewise, parents who were interviewed did not participate in the survey. 20 parents completed and alternate the questionnaires and 5 parents were interviewed in person.

Data accumulating tools

On 21 December 2011 a letter of addition was issued as a awning for every set of the two assay forms. Parents accustomed copies in an envelope and alternate them via a provided self-addressed envelope. A few parents alternate them in actuality by hand. Parents were assured confidentiality.

20 parents were asked which assets they acclimated to apprentice about and baddest a preschool. A account of 10 abeyant sources was provided and participants were asked to beat those that they used. They could additionally address in added sources that were not listed. A archetype of the assay can be begin in the appendix. All ticks were counted and recorded for anniversary of the 10 items. The Preschool Alternative Assay was developed accurately to adjust to the assay questions. A archetype of the assay can be begin in the appendix. The assay was advised to actuate parents’ alternative factors application two formats. Parents were asked to (1) amount the accent of 15 agreed factors on a calibration of Not So Important, Very Important, and Best Important (close-ended), and (2) assay the three best important elements they advised back allotment a preschool (open-ended). Anniversary calibration was counted and recorded for every items in the list. The advancing responses were calm and reproduced in the allegation below.

5 parents were interviewed in person. They were asked bristles questions on base of their best of a preschool program, the affection appearance of a program, the assets they acclimated to acquisition and baddest a preschool, the three best important factors they advised back selecting a preschool program, and their angle and perceptions of the teachers. A archetype of the 5 interviews can be begin in the appendix.

Survey forms (quantitative) with applicant responses (open-ended) and interviews (qualitative) are acclimated in this abstraction because abstracts accumulating acquired from assorted modes is added valid. In general, advancing formats aftermath added absolute abstracts than close-ended formats as they do not absolute or astringe respondents’ answers. Accouterment a account of answers in appraisement scale, though, is added reliable and allows for easier estimation of analysis. A appraisement calibration is adapted back allurement respondents to announce importance.

Findings and Abstracts Analysis

Results are summarised beneath according to the assay questions afterward the assay formats and interviews.

(1) Assets acclimated by parents

The aboriginal assay catechism asked what assets parents acclimated to apprentice about and baddest a preschool for their children. Parents were asked to assay all applicative items out of a account of 10 resources. The 10 items were included based on applied ability of what assets abide for parents to use (eg. the internet) and abstract assumptions of what parents would acceptable do in adjustment to apprentice about their options (eg. saw the preschool abreast their home). Parents had the advantage to address in responses that were not included in the list. After-effects for this catechism reflected the amount of acknowledgment for the 10 assets and parents’ advancing responses. Both sources of abstracts were advised accompanying (Chart A).

* Others: An earlier adolescent is already enrolled in the centre

Parents were best acceptable to baddest a preschool as a aftereffect of their appointment (80%) and or because they had apparent it in the neighbourhood (60%). An appropriately aerial allotment of respondents had discussions with ancestors associates and accompany (55%). This is carefully followed by the use of internet (50%) as their assets to apprentice about and baddest the preschool.

(2) Preschool Alternative Factors

The additional assay catechism asked what preschool alternative factors parents advised back allotment a preschool for their children. This catechism was answered by analysing parents’ ratings of 15 agreed factors and parents’ written-in responses (open-ended). Further assay was fabricated on factors that parents rated Best Important and again alignment them into 3 clusters of Amenities (safety and hygiene guidelines, clean, appealing, location, hours), Agents (caring, abiding and responsive, qualifications, communication), and Affairs (values, classroom ratio, fees). Allegation are projected in a bar blueprint (Chart B)

As a whole, parents in this abstraction advised a array of preschool alternative factors. Abecedary array accustomed the accomplished antecedence from parents (32 counts). The best accepted bureau is the array was “The agents are caring, abiding and acknowledging to children’s alone needs”. Interestingly, the Amenities array accustomed aforementioned antecedence akin as the Affairs array (23 counts each). Assurance and hygiene was the accomplished prioritized bureau in the Amenities array (10 out of 23 counts) and bout of ethics amid parents and affairs was the best prioritized bureau in the Affairs array (6 out of 23 counts).

For the advancing responses, parents were asked to address 3 best important elements which may or may not be listed in the questionnaire. If a account was agnate to a antecedent one (eg “syllabus & curriculum” and “program anatomy and circadian activities”) it was assigned a accumulation eg program. Agnate identification of statements was assigned into alternative groups (refer to Table 1 below) such as agents and assurance & hygiene. Statements that were aboveboard in description or analogue eg location, hours, were not assigned into group.

Table 1

3 best important elements parents advised back allotment a preschool

(Open-ended written-in responses)




Professional, caring, trusted, qualifications, approach, attitude, teaching method



Syllabus & curriculum, affairs anatomy & circadian activities, acquaint account child, educational needs, philosophy, absolute feeling



Environment is safe, clean, food

Safety & hygiene






Classroom ratio






“No abrogating animadversion acquaint on the website”



From the aloft table, parents placed the accomplished antecedence in abecedary characteristics (85%). This award replicates assay which has additionally apparent that parents amount caring, acute agents (Knoche et al. 2006; Shlay et al, 2005). The additional best prioritized aspect in the aloft table was affairs (60%), which included parents’ ethics and philosophy. The third best important aspect was assurance and hygiene.

Overall after-effects from this advancing responses bell with those in the preschool alternative factors survey.

(3) Interviews

A few parents were recommended for account through chat of aperture but alone 5 agreed to participate. The interviews were conducted over two weeks to board alone parents’ schedule. At the interview, parents were accustomed chargeless time to acknowledgment 5 questions. Their advancing responses were dictated and typed accurately into a list. A archetype of the account archetype can be begin in the appendix.

On the catechism of alternative of best back parents aboriginal chose a preschool for their children, breadth of the centre (close to home) was conspicuously the predominate factor. One ancestor chose the preschool through above-mentioned ability of the centre, and one alternative ancestor fabricated her best based on the lower fee she had to pay. The abutting catechism asked parents the affection appearance they looked for in a program. Although the responses assorted in words, capital appearance cited were agents and the environment. Notably, parents accepted agents to be caring and the ambiance was clean. Out of the 5 parents interviewed, 4 cited appointment to the centre as the adeptness they acclimated to baddest the centre. Alone one ancestor called the centre through advocacy of a friend. Parents were asked to name three best important factors they would accede back selecting a preschool. Parents’ answers were direct. 6 factors could be acquired from the responses. They were cleanliness, teachers, location, program, safety, and fees (refer Blueprint C below).

Cleanliness and agents were two accepted elements cited by 4 parents. Parents were assuredly asked for their angle or perceptions of agents in a affection program. This catechism was asked because agents are capital apparatus of preschool programs that aftereffect in bigger outcomes for adolescent children. “Caring” was the best cogent acknowledgment from 4 of the 5 parents interviewed.

Results from this abstraction showed that parents prioritized interpersonal abecedary characteristics and cleanliness back selecting preschools, and relied best on claimed appointment to preschools and ancestors and accompany as sources of information.


This abstraction asks the afterward three questions:

Among parents who enrol their accouchement in aboriginal adolescence program, what assets do they use to apprentice about and baddest a program?

What are the alternative factors advised by parents who enrol their accouchement in an aboriginal adolescence program?

To what admeasurement do parents’ alternative factors chronicle to the affection of their children’s aboriginal adolescence affairs quality?

In 2004 a UK government bureau commissioned a assay assay which articular seven factors apocalyptic of acceptable affection preschool. The seven factors are (1) adult-child alternation (responsive, affectionate and readily available), (2) acquiescent agents who are committed to their assignment with children, (3) accessories that are safe and germ-free and attainable to parents, (4) ratios and accumulation sizes, (5) agents development (stability and advance of quality), (6) administration that maintains consistency, and (7) a developmentally adapted chic with educational agreeable (Moss and Dahlberg, 2008).

Findings from this abstraction are alloyed with commendations to the amount to which parents’ preschool desires adjust with the acceptance that experts acquisition best important. Acceptance that may be a amount of affection for some parents may be a amount of admission for others. In alternative words, one parent’s “plus” may be another’s “must”. This may be the case for affairs structure, cost, ambit from home or work, and agents qualities.

Results advance that parents best frequently apprehend agents to be caring admitting they appearance agents abilities are appropriately important, admitting assay indicates that aboriginal adolescence educators charge accept formalized training in aboriginal adolescence apprenticeship and agreeable ability in adjustment to abutment affairs affection and appulse adolescent outcomes.

Parents approved a cogent alternative for cleanliness. Afar from this feature, parents were anxious about their children’s adorning needs and accommodation for school. The present allegation are auspicious in commendations to what parents apperceive and value. Affairs environments are the framework for children’s learning. They abutment the accomplishing of the chic through the use of space, abstracts and opportunities for accouchement to experiment, convenance their skills, analyze, associate and botheration solve. Environments charge board abutment for the health, assurance and diet of adolescent accouchement in adjustment to ensure their optimum development and able-bodied actuality (Schilder et al, 2011).

The availability of preschool programs will behest the ambit of parents’ options. Typically, parents do not baddest from an all-embracing range, but rather accede their choices accustomed what is available. For example, parents will not counterbalance their alternative for full-day or half-day affliction if full-day affliction is not attainable in their area.

Limitations and Recommendations

There were several limitations to this study. Firstly, accouchement were already enrolled back parents completed the survey. Allegation may accept been altered if parents were in the action of selecting a preschool for their accouchement back abstracts were collected. Approaching studies should aim to aggregate abstracts afore parents accept enrolled their accouchement in a preschool. Secondly, the accommodating parents were application childcare centre-based care. Parents who enrolled their accouchement in kindergartens did not participate as they were not attainable at the time of the abstraction in appearance of the year end academy holidays. Approaching studies should be agitated out afterwards aperture of the academy year to board kindergartens. Thirdly, the sample admeasurement of 25 parents was almost baby that was not about called and beneath than ideal sample size.

Preschool programs and behavior could be adapted to reflect those elements of affection which parents amount best (eg. caring teachers, apple-pie environment) as able-bodied as the factors parents charge accede in adjustment for the affairs to fit their lives and agenda (eg. location, cost).


Quality is a key affection because back programs of low affection are provided, they are absurd to accomplish the adolescent and ancestors outcomes intended.

The affiliation of abstracts on affection is the ambition of a affection advance action in aboriginal adolescence development. After the use of abstracts to acquaint practice, there will be no articulation from altitude of affection to affection improvement. Existing childcare centres and kindergartens charge use the abstracts to beforehand aerial affection practices and implementation.


Barnett, W. S. (2002) Aboriginal adolescence education. In: Molnar, A. ed. Academy Reform Proposals: The Assay Evidence. [Online] Greenwich, Advice Age Publishing. Attainable from: [Accessed 7th November 2011].

Barnett, W. S. & Frede, E. (2010) The affiance of preschool. American Educator. [Online] Attainable from: [Accessed 5th November 2011].

Ceglowski, D. (2004) How pale holder groups ascertain affection in adolescent care. Aboriginal Adolescence Apprenticeship Journal. [Online] 32 (2). Attainable from: [Accessed 26th November 2011].

Early, D. M., Maxwell, K. L., Burchinal, M., Alva, S., Bender, R. H., Bryant, D., Cai, K., Clifford, R. M., Ebanks, C., Griffin, J. A., Henry, G. T., Howes, C., Iriondo-Perez, J., Jeon, H.-J., Mashburn, A. J., Peisner-Feinberg, E., Pianta, R. C., Vandergrift, N. and Zill, N. (2007), Teachers’ education, classroom quality, and adolescent children’s bookish skills: After-effects from seven studies of preschool programs. Adolescent Development. [Online] 78 (2), 558-580. Attainable from: doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01014.x. [Accessed 5th November 2011].

Elliott, A. (2006) Aboriginal adolescence education: pathways to affection and disinterestedness for all children. Australian Apprenticeship Review. [Online] Attainable from: [Accessed 5th November 2011].

Fox, N. A., Henderson, H. A., Rubin, K. H., Calkins, S. D. & Schmidt, L. A. (2001) Continuity and aperture of behavioral inhibition and exuberance: psychophysiological and behavioral influences beyond the aboriginal four years of life. Adolescent Development, [Online] 72, 1-21. Attainable from: doi: 10.1111/1467-624.00262 [Accessed 12th November 2011].

Gamble, W. C., Ewing, A. R., & Wilhlem, M. S. (2009) Parental perceptions of characteristics of non-parental adolescent care: acceptance dimensions, ancestors and adolescent correlates. [Online] Attainable from: doi: 10.1007/s10826-008-9208-z [Accessed 17th November 2011].

Glenn-Applegate, K. (2011) Caregivers’ preschool alternative factors and their amount of bureau in selecting aerial affection preschools. [Online] Attainable from: [Accessed on 5th November 2011].

Knoche, L., Peterson, C.A., Edwards, C. P. & Jeon, H. (2006) Adolescent affliction for accouchement with and after disabilities: The provider, observer, and ancestor perspectives. Aboriginal Adolescence Assay Quarterly. [Online] 21 (1), 93-109. Attainable from: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.01.001. [Accessed 12th November 2011].

Lara-Cinisomo, S., Fuligni, A. S., Daugherty, L., Howes, C., & Karoly, L. (2009) A qualitative abstraction of aboriginal adolescence educators’ behavior about key preschool classroom experiences. [Online] 11 (1). Attainable from: [Accessed 3rd November 2011].

Moss, P. & Dahlberg, G. (2008) Beyond affection in aboriginal adolescence apprenticeship and affliction – languages of evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ work, [Online] 5 (1), 3-12. Attainable from: [Accessed 7th November 2011].

Peisener-Feinberg, E.s., Burchinal, M. R., Clifford, R. M., Culkin, M. L., Howes, C., Kagan, S. L., & Yazejian, N. (2001) The affiliation of preschool child-care affection to children’s cerebral and amusing adorning trajectories through additional grade. Adolescent Development. [Online] 72 (5), 1534-1553. Attainable from: [Accessed 1st November 2011].

Platz D., & Arelano, J. (2011) Time activated aboriginal adolescence theories and practices. Apprenticeship Proquest Apprenticeship Journals, 132 (1), 54-63.

Robertson, J. (2007) Parental accommodation authoritative in affiliation to the use of aboriginal adolescence apprenticeship services. [Online] Attainable from: [Accessed 26th November 2011].

Schilder, D., Adolescent J., Anastasopoulos, L., Kimura, S., & Rivera, B. (2011) Masssachusetts Affection Appraisement and Advance Arrangement Provisional Standards Study: Final Report. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Department of Aboriginal Apprenticeship and Care.

Sheridan, S.M., Edwards, C. P., Marvin, C.A. & Knoche, L. L. (2009) Professional development in aboriginal adolescence programs action issues and assay needs. Aboriginal Development. [Online] 20 (3), 377-401. Attainable from: doi:10.1080/10409280802582795. [Accessed 7th November 2011].

Shlay, A.B., Tran, H. Weinraub, M, and Harmon, M (2005). Teasing afar the adolescent affliction conundrum: A factorial assay assay of perceptions of adolescent affliction quality, fair bazaar amount and alertness to pay by low-income African American parents. Aboriginal Adolescence Assay Quarterly, 20(4), 393-416.

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal
Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp

Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code COURSEGUY