The Bear Minimum
Per your request, our accumulation conducted assay to actuate whether costs or abeyant costs of the accoutrement of Big Bear Power’s charter of Goliath Co’s agitation agent should be included in its minimum charter payments. We accept provided a arbitrary of the facts, our conclusion, the base for our conclusion, and an assay of accessible alternatives to our cessation as requested. Arbitrary of the Facts Big Bear Power (the Company), a accessible account company, is leasing a agitation agent from Goliath Co. for a 10-year, non-cancelable term.
The charter acceding was active on December 15, 2004, and the company’s appropriate to use the agent starts on January 1, 2005. Big Bear Power has been financially able for a cardinal of years, has absolute banknote flow, and is in accordance with all of its debt covenants. The charter acceding contains three provisions, anniversary of which has associated costs that may potentially charge to be included in the adding of minimum charter payments. The affair at duke is free whether the costs in these accoutrement should, in fact, be included in minimum charter payments
Conclusion Accouterment 1 Big Bear Power should not accommodate the $500,000 acceding fee in its minimum charter payments because, by definition, it is not an binding acquittal to be fabricated against the asset. On the alternative hand, the Aggregation should accommodate the $1 actor acknowledged fee in minimum charter payments back it is advised an antecedent absolute bulk fabricated in affiliation with the busy property. Accouterment 2 The charter acceding includes a accouterment acute a amends acquittal if Big Bear’s coffer declares it in absence beneath its primary acclaim arrangement.
This abeyant bulk should be included in artful minimum charter payments back a abridgement of agreed belief exists to actuate default. Accouterment 3 The charter acceding stipulates Big Bear’s anniversary charter bulk to be added by the allotment access in the Consumer Price Basis (CPI). Because the charter payments depend on the index, it charge be included in the adding of the minimum charter acquittal at the birth of the charter agreement. Base for Cessation Accouterment 1
In the Banking Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Allocation (ASC) 840-10-25-5, minimum charter payments are “the payments that the aborigine is answerable to accomplish or can be appropriate to accomplish in affiliation with the busy property,” excluding accidental rentals, any guarantees of the lessor’s debt, and executory costs. Although negotiating fees incurred by Big Bear Power are not executory costs, the fees against its alien acknowledged admonition are advised non-obligatory in attributes and should be expensed. In contrast, acknowledged fees paid by Big Bear Power on account of Goliath Co. an be categorized as antecedent absolute costs beneath Account of Banking Accounting Standards (SFAS) 91. Actuality authentic as such, they can be included in the accepted description of payments they are answerable to accomplish in affiliation with the charter agreement. Accouterment 2 Big Bear Power is accountable to absence if there is a “material adverse change” in its banking condition. FASB ASC 840-10-25-14 provides advice for absence covenants apropos to abortion and provides four altitude as follows: a. The absence acceding accouterment is accepted in leasing arrangements. b.
The accident of the accident of absence is considerately determinable. c. Predefined criteria, accompanying alone to the aborigine and its operations, has been accustomed for the assurance of the accident of default. d. It is reasonable to assume, based on the facts and affairs that abide at charter inception, that the accident of absence will not occur. In applying this condition, it is accepted that entities would accede contempo trends in the lessee's operations. The Allocation states that if the charter acceding fails to accommodated all of these conditions, Big Bear Power charge accommodate the amends in its minimum charter payments.
As already declared in the advice provided, action (a) is met. Upon added analysis, action (b) and (d) are additionally met—Big Bear’s coffer is an cold third-party that will actuate an accident of default, and Big Bear Power is financially able with alien likelihood of default. While the facts betoken that “material adverse change” is a predefined archetype to actuate default, it is our altercation that the abridgement of analogue in the abstracts is acceptable affirmation to not accomplish the third condition.
Furthermore, the absence of a analogue implies a abridgement of objectivity aural the criteria; the byword “material adverse change” provides no absolute archetype to which Big Bear Power can be advised through its operations, as allowable by the condition. Consequently, Big Bear Power should add the best bulk of the amends to the minimum charter payments. Accouterment 3 According to FASB ASC 840-10-25-4, the allocation of charter payments that depends on an index, such as the Consumer Price Index(CPI), should be included in artful minimum charter payments at charter inception.
Big Bear’s charter payments are accidental on increases in the CPI, accordingly it charge chase this rule. The charter acceding states that Big Bear will pay $1 actor per year, and the charter bulk will change at anniversary anniversary by the access in the basis rate. Alone the best contempo CPI access at birth will be included in minimum charter payments. Future increases in the basis will not be included as they are advised a accidental rental. Assay of Alternatives Accouterment 1 Alternative A agitation of Accouterment 1 suggests that Big Bear Power should not accommodate the $1 actor in acknowledged fees against minimum charter payments.
Initial absolute costs may be advised affairs abstracted from the charter itself with allowances actuality accomplished at the time of barter (International Accounting Standards Board [IASB], 2009). Their acceptance as assets would be erroneous beneath this premise, and instead would crave an actual amount to the assets statement. Still, it charcoal our team’s advocacy that the $1 actor acknowledged fees be advised as described, in accordance with the FASB’s argumentation abaft fees closely-tied to a charter agreement. Accouterment 2 Alternative
It can be arguable that the appropriate amends acquittal beneath a acknowledgment of absence should not be included in the minimum charter payments. As stated, FASB ASC 840-10-25-14 provides four conditions, which, if all fulfilled, would not accommodate the amends in minimum charter payments. Based on those facts provided, and behindhand of the analogue abaft “material adverse change”, it is arguable that a acceptable archetype exists to actuate default. Furthermore, the archetype is accustomed by a third-party with no affiliation to Goliath Company.
This would accomplish action (c). Accouterment 3 Alternative Alternative analysis of this accouterment would acclimatize minimum charter payments annually afterwards 2005 for the anniversary access in the Consumer Price Index. For example, if the charter acquittal in 2005 is $1 actor and the best contempo CPI increases by 4%, the charter acquittal would access to $1,040,000 in 2006, and $1,081,600 in 2007. The acumen for this access is to added accurately admeasurement the charter acceding for banking reporting.
However, this adjustment is not in acceding with FASB ASC 840-10-25-4, which states a charter abased on an basis should alone accommodate the basis absolute at charter birth back artful minimum charter payments. References Banking Accounting Standards Board. (n. d. ). Accounting standards codification. Norwalk, CT: Banking Accounting Standards Board. Retrieved February 8, 2010. International Accounting Standards Board. (2009). IASB agents paper: leases – antecedent absolute costs. London, United Kingdom: International Accounting Standards Board. Retrieved February 8, 2010.
Order a unique copy of this paper