|GRADE 7||GRADE 6||GRADE 5||GRADE 4||GRADE 1-3|
|12.75 - 15||11.25 – 12.7||9.75 – 11.2||7.5 – 9.7||0 – 7.4|
|Application of Cardinal Planning Tools and Techniques|
Mark awarded: …../15
|Insightful, acute and actuating appliance of pertinent cardinal planning techniques to all stages of development.||Incisive and actuating appliance of pertinent cardinal planning techniques to all stages of development.||Competent appliance of pertinent cardinal planning techniques to all stages of development.||Constrained appliance of pertinent cardinal planning techniques to best stages of development.||Poor or absent appliance of pertinent cardinal planning techniques.|
|12.75 - 15||11.25 – 12.7||9.75 – 11.2||7.5 – 9.7||0 – 7.4|
Mark awarded: …./15
|Clear, articular and blunt description of the aloft issues accompanied by astute and acute analytical analysis of their access or impact.||Clear and articular description of the aloft issues accompanied by acute analytical analysis of their access or impact.||Clear description of the aloft issues accompanied by analytical analysis of their access or impact.||Limited description of the aloft problems accompanied by bound analysis of their access and impact.||Unable to analyze the aloft problems and clumsy to appraise their access or impact.|
|Conclusions and Recommendations|
Mark awarded …./10
|Conclusions and recommendations accept ascertainable aerial applied amount and are accurate by bright and cogent justification.||Conclusions and recommendations accept applied amount and are accurate by bright and cogent arguments.||Conclusions and recommendations accept applied amount but are not consistently accurate by bright or cogent arguments.||Conclusions and recommendations accept bound applied amount and/or are frequently not accurate by bright or cogent arguments.||Conclusions and recommendations accept little applied amount and/or are not accurate by bright or cogent arguments.|
|Structure and Accounting Presentation|
Mark awarded: .…/10
|Excellent use of accounting language, and analytic anatomy which succinctly conveys aloft issues. The abode is chargeless of spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors and applies constant formatting of argument and headings throughout.||Sound use of accounting communication, and anatomy which conveys aloft issues. The abode is chargeless of spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors. Formatting of argument and headings is mainly consistent.||Competent use of accounting accent and structure, which conveys best of the aloft issues. The abode is about chargeless of spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors. Formatting of argument and headings is about consistent.||Written announcement is at times cryptic and ungrammatical. The abode contains some errors in spelling, punctuation and there are cogent inconsistencies in the formatting of argument and headings.||The abode is ailing structured, ailing accounting and contains cogent errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar and formatting.|
Overview: The Seattle, Washington All-Hazard Acknowledgment Plan will be advised application the FEMA Bounded Acknowledgment Plan Review Tool from the FEMA Plan Review Guide (2011). Complete the afterward steps:
Regulation Checklist Section Instructions: The purpose of the Checklist is to analyze the area of accordant or applicative agreeable in the Plan by Element/sub‐element and to actuate if anniversary claim has been ‘Met’ or ‘Not Met.’ The ‘Required Revisions’ arbitrary at the basal of anniversary Element charge be completed to accommodate a bright account of the revisions that are adapted for plan approval. Adapted revisions charge be explained for anniversary plan sub‐element that is ‘Not Met.’ Sub-elements should be referenced in anniversary arbitrary by application the adapted numbers (A1, B3, etc.), area applicable. Requirements for anniversary Element and sub-element are declared in detail in this Plan Review Guide in Section 4, Regulation Checklist.
Plan Assessment Section Instructions: The purpose of the Plan Assessment is to action the bounded association added absolute acknowledgment to the association on the affection and account of the plan in a anecdotal format. The admirers for the Plan Assessment is not alone the plan developer/local association planner, but additionally adopted officials, bounded departments and agencies, and others complex in implementing the Bounded Acknowledgment Plan. The Assessment is an befalling for the analyst to accommodate acknowledgment and advice to the association on: 1) appropriate improvements to the Plan; 2) specific sections in the Plan area the association has gone aloft and aloft minimum requirements.
After bushing out the Regulation Checklist, adapt a Arbitrary of Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement. The Plan Assessment Arbitrary charge not reiterate the adapted revisions from the Regulation Checklist or be authoritative in nature, and should be open‐ended and to accommodate the association with suggestions for improvements or recommended revisions. It is recommended that the Plan Assessment Arbitrary be able as a abridgment of the all-embracing strengths and weaknesses of the Plan.
Requirements: Complete the Regulation Checklist. Any areas not applicative will be marked, “N/A.” The Plan Assessment Arbitrary of Strengths and Opportunities will be one-two pages in length.
|Title of Plan and Date of Plan|
|Reviewer’s name andDate of acknowledgment plan review:|
ELEMENT B. Hazard Identification and Accident Assessment Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Bounded Acknowledgment Plans)
|Location in Plan:Section & folio number||Met||Not Met|
|B1. Does the Plan accommodate a description of the type, location, and admeasurement of all accustomed hazards that can affect anniversary jurisdiction(s)? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i))|
|B2. Does the Plan accommodate advice on antecedent occurrences of hazard contest and on the anticipation of approaching hazard contest for anniversary jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i))|
|B3. Is there a description of anniversary articular hazard’s appulse on the association as able-bodied as an all-embracing arbitrary of the community’s vulnerability for anniversary jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii))|
|B4. Does the Plan abode NFIP insured structures aural the administration that accept been repetitively damaged by floods? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii))|
ELEMENT B: REQUIRED REVISIONS:
Plan Assessment Section Arbitrary of Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement: After commutual the Regulation Checklist for Element B (above) present the strengths of the plan certificate and analyze areas area these could be bigger aloft minimum requirements.
Element B: Hazard Identification and Accident Assessment
Summary instructions: In one-two pages, call how and the admeasurement to which the plan describes vulnerability in agreement of:
1) A accepted description of acreage uses and approaching development trends aural the association so that acknowledgment options can be advised in approaching acreage use decisions;
2) The types and numbers of absolute and approaching buildings, infrastructure, and analytical accessories amid in the articular hazard areas; and
3) A description of abeyant dollar losses to accessible structures, and a description of the alignment acclimated to adapt the estimate. How does the Plan go aloft and aloft minimum requirements to certificate the Hazard Identification and Accident Assessment with account to: