Turner, F. J. (Ed.). (2017). Amusing assignment treatment: Interlocking abstract approaches (6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Chapter 35: Solution-Focused Theory (pp. 513–531)
Chapter 36: Task-Centered Amusing Assignment (pp. 532–552)
Westefeld, J. S., & Heckman-Stone, C. (2003). The chip analytic archetypal of crisis intervention: overview and application. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(2), 221–239.
Document: Theory Into Practice: Four Amusing Assignment Case Studies (PDF)
Document: Kaltura Personal Capture - QuickStart Guide (PDF)
Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2014). Counseling and psychotherapy theories in ambience and practice [Video file]. Psychotherapy.net.
This week, watch the “Solution-Focused Therapy” articulation by watching from 3:37:35-3:59:52 on the time marker.
Johnson, S. D., & Williams, S.-L. (2015). Solution-focused strategies for able animal bloom advice amid African American parents and their adolescents. Bloom & Amusing Work, 40(4), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlv056
Myer, R. A., Lewis, J. S., & James, R.K. (2013). The addition of a assignment archetypal for crisis intervention. Journal of Mental Bloom Counseling, 35(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.35.2.nh322x3547475154
Reid, W. J. (1997). Research on task-centered practice. Journal of Amusing Assignment Research, 21(3), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/21.3.132
Discussion: Solution-Focused Model: Allurement Questions
Social workers who advance the solution-focused archetypal are alert of how their conversations with their clients, families, groups, or alike association associates facilitate their cerebration about solutions. The applicant is consistently the “expert,” and accordingly amusing workers ask questions to analyze how the applicant perceives the botheration and situation.
Social workers may use solution-focused questions such as the phenomenon question. For example, “Suppose you woke up one morning and by some phenomenon aggregate you anytime wanted, aggregate acceptable you could anytime brainstorm for yourself, had absolutely happened—your activity had angry out absolutely the way you capital it. What would be altered in your life?” When audience are asked this, it armament them to reflect on what they appetite or would like to achieve. By bulging themselves into the future, audience are added acceptable to brainstorm what is accessible rather than absorption on the accomplished and their failures. This allows for the achievability of developing solutions.
In this Discussion, you administer the solution-focused archetypal and solution-focused questions. You accommodate alternative solution-focused questions, agnate to the phenomenon catechism that was provided for you.
Although the arbiter provides absolute examples of solution-focused questions, consistently anticipate about your client—you may accept to adapt the catechism a bit to booty into annual the client’s age, cerebral and adorning stage, culture, etc., so that the catechism makes faculty to the client.
Recall a case from your fieldwork acquaintance to use for this Discussion.
Review and focus on pages 520–521 in your textbook.
By Day 3
In 1 to 2 sentences, briefly analyze and call the botheration as perceived by the client, family, or accumulation that you dealt with in your accomplished fieldwork experience.
From the account of solution-focused questions on folio 520 (e.g., barring questions, arresting questions, ascent questions, and accord questions), analyze two altered types of questions, and ask anniversary catechism as if you were absolutely allurement the questions to the client. (Remember, do not use the phenomenon question.)
Remember that the ambition of these questions is to abetment audience in anecdotic a solution
Explain how allurement these two questions would advice the applicant in advancing up with the solution.
In 1 to 2 sentences, reflect and explain how allurement these questions fabricated you feel and conceivably how the applicant ability feel.
Order a unique copy of this paper