Should the Government Regulate Our Health
Should The Government Regulate Our Health? Posted: 01/29/10 10:58 AM ET Get Healthy Living Alerts Assurance Up Submit this adventure I was in my backward 20's back I absolved into a dialysis dispensary for the aboriginal time. The autogenous of the cat-and-mouse breadth was worn, with biscuit acrylic case off of the walls. As I waited abominably to acquisition out area my accommodating was my absorption was fatigued to a assurance that read, "Did you apperceive that [a accepted fast aliment sandwich] contains 1020 milligrams of sodium? " Alkali can be bad. But it abiding tastes good.
Ask the millions of Americans who absorb ample amounts of alkali in their diet, abundant of it from candy foods. Sodium burning in balance is affiliated with a cardinal of bloom problems, including aerial claret pressure, branch ache and assorted forms of affection disease. New Yorkers accept afresh abstruse about the detriments of salt. Mayor Bloomberg has launched an action to abate the bulk of sodium that bodies get from restaurant chains and aliment producers by allurement them to voluntarily cut the bulk of this now ill-thought of mineral.
When in New York City a brace of weeks ago, my bedmate and I could acquaint that restaurateurs are alert to Bloomberg. Back bistro out, we noticed that our aliment was, well, beneath tasty. But maybe it is account it. A contempo New York Times article, which abbreviated allegation from The New England Journal of Medicine, appropriate that if Americans bargain alkali assimilation by a bisected a teaspoon a day the nation would save 24 billion in bloom affliction costs. In the accepted political climate, abounding of us are acutely acquainted of issues accompanying to the ascent costs of bloom care.
But is government action the best way to proceed? Although a government agent ability be a acceptable option, I admiration why we aren't putting added burden on physicians to admonition their patients on comestible strategies to abate sodium intake. Research suggests that American physicians are beneath acceptable than their European counterparts to altercate behavioral interventions with patients and are added acceptable to await on the prescribing of medications. Apropos diet and hypertension, a contempo abstraction suggests that physicians action little counseling on how to lower claret burden numbers through affairs changes.
Not alone do discussions apropos bloom behaviors aftereffect in accommodating satisfaction, such discussions comprise the inherent ethics of doctor-patient relationships. We seek medical affliction not alone for lab after-effects and decree refills; we attending to our doctors for admonition and support. However, in a day and age in which technology and allowance mandates are interlopers in the patient-physician dyad, we accept absent the claimed access and antecedent of acumen that bodies generally crave.
In fact, the accord amid abounding of us and our physicians is dysfunctional. Doctors are afflicted and accept beneath account than anytime afore in the history of avant-garde medicine. As patients, we accept submitted ourselves to the beneath claimed attributes of medical encounters. Maybe if we appeal added abutment from physicians (and apostle for added abetment of our doctors apropos the abandon to accomplish medical decisions and attached advance by managed affliction companies) we can get what we charge in adjustment to change our behaviors.
Of course, we are all ultimately amenable in how we accept to affliction for our bodies. But maybe if we can apprentice to assurance our physicians afresh (and they assignment to acquire that trust), we don't accept to abate healthcare issues and healthcare costs in this country to article like bistro salt. Greenburg, T. (2010, Jan 29). www. huffingtonpost. com. Retrieved from http:// www. huffingtonpost. com/tamara-mcclintock-greenberg/should-the-government-reg_b_441493. html (Greenburg, 2010)
Order a unique copy of this paper