Research Paper-Quantitative Analyses
For this assignment, you are to assay a qualitative assay study.
Go to Galilio
Kucharczyk, S., Reutebuch, C. K., Carter, E. W., Hedges, S., El Zein, F., Fan, H., & Gustafson, J. R. (2015). Addressing the Needs of Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Considerations and Complexities for High School Interventions. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 329-349
. Note: you are not to abode “yes” “no” answers. You are to call the assay as well
as evaluate. For example, in anecdotic the assay report, if there is a annual of the
problem, accompaniment what it is. Of course, you should not recapitulate the absolute article; you
should accommodate a arbitrary of what is included with a focus on the best arresting credibility in
Your appraisal should abode anniversary area of the assay application a architecture of summary
and assay for anniversary area (not anniversary question). For example, back you appraise the
“Problem,” abridge the area and appraise it based on the belief for evaluation.
Be abiding that you analyze and ascertain the variables.
7. The arbitrary and assay of anniversary area of the assay should anniversary be one or
paragraphs in length.
Is there a annual of the problem? Does the botheration announce a accurate focus of study?
■ Is the botheration researchable? That is, can it be advised by accession and allegory data?
■ Is accomplishments advice on the botheration presented?
■ Is the educational acceptation of the botheration discussed?
■ Does the botheration annual announce the variables of absorption and the specific relations amid the variables that were investigated?
■ Back necessary, are variables anon or operationally defined?
■ Did the researcher accept the ability and accomplishment to backpack out the research?
Review of accompanying literature.
■ Is the analysis comprehensive?
■ Is the analysis able-bodied organized? Does it breeze logically so that the references atomic accompanying to the botheration are discussed aboriginal and those best accompanying are discussed last? Does it brainwash the clairvoyant about the botheration or topic?
■ Is the analysis added than a alternation of abstracts or annotations? That is, accept the references been analyzed and critiqued and the after-effects of assorted studies compared and contrasted?
■ Are all cited references accordant to the botheration beneath investigation? Is the appliance of anniversary advertence explained?
■ Does the analysis achieve with a arbitrary and estimation of the abstract and its implications for the botheration beneath study?
■ Do the implications anatomy an empiric or abstract annual for the hypotheses that follow?
■ Are best of the sources primary (i.e., are there alone a few or no accessory sources)?
■ Are references cited absolutely and accurately?
■ Are specific assay questions listed or specific hypotheses state
d? ■ Is anniversary antecedent testable?
■Does anniversary antecedent accompaniment an accepted affiliation or difference?
■If necessary, are variables anon or operationally defined?
■ Are the admeasurement and above characteristics of the citizenry described?
■If a sample was selected, is the adjustment of selecting the sample acutely described?
■ Does the adjustment of sample alternative beforehand any limitations or biases in the sample? For example, was stratified sampling acclimated to access sample subgroups?
■ Are the admeasurement and above characteristics of the sample described?
■If the abstraction is quantitative, does the sample admeasurement accommodated the adapted guidelines for the minimum sample admeasurement adapted for the adjustment of assay represent
■ Do instruments and their administering accommodated guidelines for attention animal subjects? Were bare permissions obtained?
■ Are the instruments adapted for barometer the advised variables?
■ Was the actual blazon of apparatus acclimated for abstracts accumulating (e.g., was a norm-referenced
instrument acclimated back a criterion-referenced one was added suitable)?
■ Is the annual accustomed for the alternative of the instruments (or measurements) used?
■Are the purpose, content, validity, and believability of anniversary apparatus described?
■If appropriate, are subtest reliabilities given?
■Is affirmation presented to announce that the instruments are adapted for the advised sample? For example, is the annual akin of an apparatus acceptable for sample participants?
■ If an apparatus was developed accurately for the study, are the procedures complex in its development and validation described?
■ If an apparatus was developed accurately for the study, are administration, scoring or tabulating, and estimation procedures absolutely described?
■ Does the researcher accept the bare abilities or acquaintance to assemble or administrate an instrument?
Design and Procedure
■ Are the architecture and procedures adapted for analytical the assay catechism or testing the hypotheses of the study?
■ Are the procedures declared in acceptable detail to admittance archetype by addition researcher?
■ Do procedures logically chronicle to one another?
■ Were instruments and procedures activated correctly?
■If a pilot abstraction was conducted, are its beheading and after-effects described? Is the aftereffect on the consecutive abstraction explained?
■ Are ascendancy procedures described?
■ Does the researcher altercate or annual for any potentially abashing capricious that he or she was clumsy to control?
■ Are adapted anecdotic statistics presented?
■ Are the tests of acceptation appropriate, accustomed the hypotheses and architecture of the study?
■ If parametric tests were used, is there affirmation that the researcher abhorred actionable the appropriate assumptions for parametric tests?
■ Was the anticipation akin at which the tests of acceptation were evaluated defined in beforehand of the abstracts analyses? Was every antecedent tested?
Order a unique copy of this paper