Investigate Development Case: Blowing Exercise and abide your acknowledgment in the argument box here.
MAKE A DECISION: Do you anticipate Emily should accept in a altered average school?
Why? Give affidavit for why you chose the way you did. Consider the afterward factors in your reasons:
PSY 1821 Case Development Rubric 2.1PSY 1821 Case Development Rubric 2.1CriteriaRatingsPtsThis archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeContent20.0 to >15.0 ptsAdvancedAll key apparatus of the Case Development questions are addressed. Proper analogue to call concepts in the vignette are acclimated (3 or added terms).15.0 to >10.0 ptsProficientMost key apparatus of the Case Development questions are addressed. Proper analogue to call concepts in the vignette are acclimated (2 terms).10.0 to >5.0 ptsDevelopingSome key apparatus of the Case Development questions are addressed. Proper analogue to call concepts in the vignette are acclimated (1 term).5.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorFew or no key apparatus of the Case Development questions are addressed. Proper analogue to call concepts in the vignette are not used.0.0 ptsNot Present20.0 pts
This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeFocus10.0 to >9.0 ptsAdvancedWriting charcoal focused on the affair assigned throughout, bringing anniversary branch aback to the apriorism and authoritative access to sources. Cardboard additionally meets all breadth requirements (250 words or more).9.0 to >8.0 ptsProficientWriting mostly focuses on the affair assigned but misses some access amid sources and thesis. Cardboard meets at atomic 80 percent of the breadth requirement.8.0 to >7.0 ptsDevelopingWriting focuses on affair throughout but loses focus or digresses in alone paragraphs. Cardboard meets at atomic 70 percent of the breadth requirement.7.0 to >1.0 ptsPoorWriting struggles to focus on the affair in alone paragraphs and in the cardboard as a whole. Cardboard meets at atomic 65 percent of the breadth requirement.1.0 to >0 ptsNot PresentWriting was not submitted, is about a affair alternative than the one assigned, or meets beneath than 65 percent of the breadth requirement.10.0 pts
This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style10.0 to >9.0 ptsAdvancedAssignment accurately follows APA formatting, including a appellation page, abstract, header, folio numbers, and advertence page. Sources are cited accurately in the document.9.0 to >8.0 ptsProficientAssignment is mostly accurately formatted and/or sources are cited, but there are a few errors in the format.8.0 to >7.0 ptsDevelopingAssignment exhibits abounding errors in APA formatting and/or sources are cited, but there are several errors in the format.7.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorAPA formatting is attempted, but several elements are missing or incorrect, an/or some of the sources are not cited and/or the architecture is incorrect.0.0 ptsNot PresentSources are not cited at all/format is not actual and/or APA is not attempted.10.0 pts
This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeSpelling and Grammar10.0 to >5.0 ptsAdvancedSpelling and grammar are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Paragraphs accommodate appropriately assorted book structures.5.0 to >3.0 ptsProficientThere are some spelling and grammar errors. Some book akin errors are present as well. Paragraphs accommodate some assorted book structures.3.0 to >2.0 ptsDevelopingSpelling and grammar errors abstract from meaning. Paragraphs are ailing formed.2.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorMultiple spelling and grammar errors. Sentences are abridged or unclear.0.0 ptsNot Present10.0 pts