reading response

Please note:  Your cardboard charge be uploaded as a Word doc or pdf. Pages files charge be adapted to pdf. Pages files will not be accepted. Beware of plagiarism! UF Canvas uses Turnitin appropriation software. Appropriation is a actual austere bookish offense. Do not borrow addition person's words or account after able citation. Turnitin scans a database of affidavit ahead submitted to universities nationwide, including UF.  READ the afterward article:  Carolyn Dean, "The Trouble with (The Term) Art," 2006 Settings , and abode a acknowledgment cardboard (800-word minimum to 1000-word maximum) in which you do the following: As you apprehend the article, see if the columnist provides acute affirmation to abutment her claims. Does she chase through on the altercation presented in her apriorism statement? After you've apprehend the article, ask yourself if the author's altercation is relevant. How does it chronicle to our advance material? Does she arise to accept any biases that would unfairly ageism her research? Abode all these questions in your response. This is a analytical response, not a arbitrary of the commodity you've read. Your responses should be alarmingly engaged. Do not generalize or summarize. Provide specific examples from the commodity to abutment your point of view. Avoid abundant or continued absolute quotes. If you do adduce or paraphrase, be abiding to adduce your source. You should consistently adduce your sources for annihilation you write, every time. To not do so constitutes plagiarism. A account acknowledgment cardboard doesn't about accommodate assorted alfresco sources (it's not a analysis paper)--unless your appetite to use them, which is be fine. The best architecture for a account acknowledgment cardboard is to chase the in-text commendation appearance adviser at articulation below. If you alone adduce the commodity you're responding to, again you are alone application one source. For this, you can artlessly accord all the commodity advice in your anterior paragraph, which you should do anyway-- so no charge for "sources" account at basal of your paper. Again chase the adviser for the appearance you adopt (see three options at articulation below) for in-text citation. In this case, about aloof the folio number. The important affair is to be constant throughout your cardboard for the appearance you choose. If you do adduce alfresco sources, again you charge to account them at the basal of your cardboard with in-text commendation as directed in the guide. *Be abiding to accept a attending at the explanation criteria, below, for which you will be assessed. Once your cardboard has been graded, be abiding to apprehend the comments/feedback anchored in the rubric, and/or provided in the animadversion balloon beneath your grade. See the following: Autograph a acknowledgment paper Settings See the following: Sample acknowledgment paper Settings See the following: Commendation guide Settings Rubric 2019 Account Acknowledgment Paper2019 Account Acknowledgment PaperCriteriaRatingsPtsThis archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeREQUIRED LENGTH1.5 ptsRequired breadth or abreast adapted length1.0 ptsNoticeably beneath than adapted length0.5 pts50% or beneath than adapted length1.5 pts This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeCOLLEGE LEVEL WRITING + ENGLISH1.0 ptsExcellent autograph with few errors0.9 ptsExcellent autograph with several errors0.8 ptsGood autograph with several errors0.75 ptsGood autograph with assorted errors0.6 ptsOkay autograph with assorted errors0.5 ptsWriting needs abundant improvement1.0 pts This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeAPPROPRIATE FORMAT INCLUDING INTRO, BODY + CONCLUSION0.5 ptsValid format0.4 ptsGood architecture with one or two issues in branch structures, aperture sentences or apriorism placement/thesis support0.3 ptsOkay architecture but adamantine to follow0.2 ptsFormat adumbrated but needs abundant improvement0.1 ptsNo bright format, difficult to follow0.5 pts This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomePROPER USE OF CITATIONS (at minimum, acquaint author, title, date in aboriginal paragraph); if alfresco sources, accommodate bibliography; consistently accommodate folio numbers back quoting/paraphrase primary article0.5 ptsIncludes author, title, date in introduction; folio numbers for quotes/paraphrase =or= includes bibliography/references folio and, back relevant, footnotes or endnotes0.4 ptsIncludes author, title, date in addition but no folio numbers for quotes/paraphrase0.3 ptsProvides alone fractional commendation in introduction; folio numbers for quotes/paraphrase0.2 ptsProvides alone fractional commendation and no folio numbers0.1 ptsVague advertence to commodity appellation or columnist name; no advertence to folio numbers0.0 ptsNo commendation at all; Back relevant, no folio numbers0.5 pts This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeFORMULATED OWN ARGUMENT IN RESPONSE TO THE AUTHOR'S0.5 ptsFormulated own altercation and acutely defines it0.4 ptsFormulates own altercation but doesn't acutely ascertain it0.3 ptsImplies own argument, attempts to ascertain it0.2 ptsImplies own argument, but makes no attack to ascertain it0.1 ptsMakes no attack to codify own argument/point of view0.5 pts This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeEFFECTIVE RHETORICAL STRUCTURE/EFFECTIVELY DEFENDS OWN ARGUMENT0.5 ptsStrong articulate structure/effectively defends own view0.4 ptsGood articulate rigor0.3 ptsOkay articulate rigor/some attack to avert own altercation and/or aegis of own altercation not absolutely successful0.2 ptsImplies attack to abutment own argument, but not rhetorically rigorous0.1 ptsMakes no attack to abutment own argument0.5 pts This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeADDRESSED AUTHOR BIAS0.5 ptsAddresses bias0.25 ptsImplies altercation of bias, but not acutely stated0.0 ptsDoes not abode bias0.5 pts This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeDOES AT LEAST 40% OF THIS PAPER CONSTITUTE A RESPONSE RATHER THAN A SUMMARY OF THE ARTICLE?0.5 pts40% response0.4 pts30% response0.3 pts20% response0.2 pts10% response0.1 ptsNo response, alone summary0.5 pts This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeUSED IDEAS PRESENTED IN CLASS LECTURES/READING0.5 ptsUsed account from class0.25 ptsImplies references to actual from class, but does not acutely state0.0 ptsDid not use account from class0.5 pts This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeDiversity - Contentview best descriptionthreshold: 1.0 pts1.0 ptsMastery. The apprentice interprets and applies the terminology, concepts, methodologies and theories acclimated aural assorted texts.0.0 ptsNon-mastery. The apprentice does not adapt and administer the terminology, concepts, methodologies and theories acclimated aural assorted texts.--  This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeDiversity - Analytical Thiningview best descriptionthreshold: 1.0 pts1.0 ptsMastery - The apprentice considers the issues from assorted perspectives, logically analyzes affirmation from credible, accordant sources, and develops articular conclusions.0.0 ptsNon-Mastery - The apprentice does not accede the issues from assorted perspectives, does not logically assay affirmation from credible, accordant sources, or does not advance articular conclusions.--  This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeHumanities - Communicationview best descriptionthreshold: 1.0 pts1.0 ptsMastery - The apprentice expresses account in a convincing, organized, clear, articular address that is about absurdity chargeless and uses a appearance and accent adapted to the accountable area.0.0 ptsNon-Mastery - The apprentice does not accurate account in a convincing, organized, clear, articular address that is about absurdity free, or uses a appearance or accent that is not adapted to the accountable area.--  This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeHumanities - Contentview best descriptionthreshold: 1.0 pts1.0 ptsMastery - The apprentice interprets and applies the terminology, concepts, methodologies and theories acclimated aural the accountable area.0.0 ptsNon-Mastery - The apprentice does not adapt or administer the terminology, concepts, methodologies or theories acclimated aural the accountable area.--  This archetype is affiliated to a Learning OutcomeHumanities - Analytical Thinkingview best descriptionthreshold: 1.0 pts1.0 ptsMastery - The apprentice considers the issues from assorted perspectives, logically analyzes affirmation from credible, accordant sources, and develops articular conclusions.0.0 ptsNon-Mastery - The apprentice does not accede the issues from assorted perspectives, does not logically assay affirmation from credible, accordant sources, or does not advance articular conclusions.

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal
Order now and a get a 25% discount with the discount code: COURSEGUYOrder Now!
+ +
Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp