Read about the Ford Pinto case (Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 757 (4th Dist. 1981) ) on pages 118-120 of the text and answer the below questions.
Read about the Ford Pinto case (Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 757 (4th Dist. 1981) ) on pages 118-120 of the argument and acknowledgment the beneath questions.
1. Describe the Court of Appeal's acumen in DENYING Ford's address (arguing that the balloon court's accolade of $3.5 actor in castigating amercement to the victim was not accustomed or not valid)? [2 points]
2. If you were on the jury, in your opinion, would you accept awarded castigating amercement to the plaintiffs? How abundant and why? [Remember that castigating amercement are advised to abuse the defendant-- to accelerate a bulletin to association and avert or anticipate the defendant's behavior to action again. Castigating amercement are not accompanying to the absolute amount of the accident incurred by the plaintiff (like medical bills)] [2 points]
3. If you had been on the administration aggregation at Ford and all of the alternative managers agreed not to fix the accepted botheration with the Pinto, but you disagreed, what would you accept done based on your own ethics, ethics and opinion? [1 point]
Order a unique copy of this paper