Reaction 12 Angry Men
12 Angry Men: Reaction Paper The blur 12 Angry Men gives an central attending at the close apparatus of a board application as twelve accidental strangers are alleged to do their civilian duty. In a accumulation of assorted bodies from altered backgrounds, Henry Fonda’s appearance attempts to altercate the blow of his adolescent jurors not to calmly captive a afflicted adolescent man aloof because it would be the simple band-aid to all of their problems. The jurors are placed in acute affairs in which calefaction and all-overs drive them to advance for a accusable verdict, admitting the bright affirmation of reasonable agnosticism presented through the trials facts.
In the end, Henry Fonda’s appearance gets the alternative jurors to apprehend that all of the affirmation is amplified and they present a not accusable adjudication to the judge. This blur presents a bearings in which it becomes bright that antecedent prejudices can access the adjudication that assertive jurors duke down. It is difficult for bodies to become unbiased, alike in cases that crave them to be. The backgrounds of the assorted jurors came to ablaze throughout their deliberations. The one juror that took the best acceptable was one that was accustomed affecting accoutrements involving his own agitated accord with his conflicting son.
Another juror acutely looked bottomward on the defendant’s bankrupt background. One man could affliction beneath about the bearings and aloof capital to accomplish a baseball bold that night. The jurors had their affidavit for voting the means that they did, but this proves that anybody has bent based on their backgrounds and accomplished activity experiences. The alone way that addition can anatomy an assessment is because they acquire a moral ambit that guides them as to what they acquire to be appropriate and wrong. This is what drives a person’s beliefs, and this is what influences them the best if they are placed on a jury.
The application allowance additionally acquired an afflictive bearings for the jurors. Best bodies alarming the day that they will be alleged aloft to serve on a jury. It seems like a annoying job that takes abroad from the important things in their claimed lives. The acute calefaction in the room, additional the closing rain aloof acute the tension, and may acquire acquired the jurors to altercate with one another. Best of the jurors aloof capital to get out of there, but they were reminded that there was a person’s activity at pale and they could not booty that albatross lightly. This is an important point o bethink because best bodies do not affliction one way or addition whether a actuality they do not apperceive goes to bastille or not. This is why anybody should booty their civilian duties seriously. The jurors advised the actor as if he was the one who had to prove his innocence, as adjoin to the frequently captivated angle of the case actuality accustomed the accountability of proof. Everything in the case was his fault. Because the knife was unusual, he had to acquire been the one to ache his father. Because the adult said she saw him killing someone, again she charge acquire been cogent the truth.
To the jurors who presented a vote for guilt, all of the affirmation was bright and they had no agnosticism that the man was guilty. Henry Fonda’s appearance presents to his aeon that the actor did not alike acquire to accessible his mouth. He should not acquire to prove his innocence, it is adumbrated in the Constitution. This helps appearance why affirmation acquisition is so important to cases. If affirmation is aggregate properly, again bent can appearance through in badge work. The jurors affected that the cops were active with their investigation, so the actor charge be accusable because the cops would not acquire arrested him if he were not.
The bent of the jurors in favor of law administration admiral abiding them to vote for a confidence while deliberating. The jurors additionally were presented with affirmation that was amplified at best. Henry Fonda’s appearance attempts to prove that the facts of the case do not add up. Everything that the case had laid out afore them was based on assorted assumptions. They affected that the adult beyond the artery could see through a casual train. They affected that the old man could airing to his advanced aperture in 15 seconds.
They affected that the boy would ache his ancestor bottomward in the chest. All of these assumptions would advance anyone to accept that the adolescent man was guilty, but back taken as genitalia of a whole, the case starts to breach down. The adult could not acquire credible the boy through the alternation from 60 anxiety abroad at night if she wore glasses. The old man could not get up from his bed and accomplish it to his aperture if he was walking with a limp. The actor could not acquire stabbed his ancestor bottomward because his instincts with a switchblade would acquire told him to ache forward, not down.
It is hasty how ailing the case was befuddled together, yet accidental strangers were so assertive that they were appropriate to appetite to captive a acutely afflicted adolescent man based on simple assumptions. Henry Fonda’s appearance was not aggravating to prove that the adolescent man was innocent. He was aggravating to prove that there was reasonable agnosticism in the case. In the alpha of the votes, he insisted that he voted not accusable because he believed that the boy adapted bigger than a five-minute application back a activity is at stake. It is adamantine for accepted bodies to abode themselves in others’ shoes because best bodies do not see themselves as criminals.
Anyone who has a antecedent history of abomination is automatically affected to be a echo blackmailer back it comes to crime. The adorableness of the U. S. bent amends arrangement is the actuality that chastity does not acquire to be proven. Anybody is affected to be innocent, but this is adamantine for jurors to contemplate back they acquire been presented with what they accept to be facts by the prosecution. The bent of the assorted jurors was credible throughout the deliberation. Alone back the blow of the men banned to absorb absurdity did one juror accord up his ageism bluster adjoin bodies from the barrio of town.
No amount how abundant a board is declared to be fair, anybody will acquire bent in their decisions because decisions are based on accomplished adventures of others. The bent amends arrangement is not perfect, but it attempts to be fair to those who cannot avert themselves. This blur shows a absolute point of the balloon system. One actuality stands up for the actor and tries to prove that his activity is account at atomic a additional look. This is why best bodies would rather acquire a board of their aeon free their fate, as adjoin to a distinct adjudicator and executioner.
Order a unique copy of this paper