“Erikson accomplished heartedly captivated to the abstraction that development was not artlessly psychosexual but additionally psychosocial. The abstraction of this cardboard is to admit my claimed and present psychosocial date of development. I will attack to analysis the behaviors and influences on my relationships forth with the abrogating and absolute outcomes of my date of psychosocial development. I will additionally altercate alternative adorning influences that accept shaped my personality. Erikson had developed a blueprint of eight stages of psychosocial development. Each of these stages shows absolute and abrogating outcomes for personality development.
These eight stages are the following: Trust vs. Apprehension at 1 year old, freedom vs. doubt/shame at 2-3 years old, Initiative vs. answerability at 4-5 years old, industry vs. inferiority at latency, character vs. circulation at adolescence, acquaintance vs. abreast early- adulthood, and lastly, candor vs. anguish at after years. Accepted Psychosocial Date of Development: In attractive over Erikson’s psychosocial date blueprint I accept appear to the cessation that my accepted date of development is Acquaintance against Isolation. Erikson states that this date of development usually occurs in aboriginal adulthood.
According to Erikson the positives of this date of development are administration with family, friends, coworkers and ally about all work, thoughts and feelings. The negatives accommodate abstention of acquaintance and apparent relationships. (Cervone & Pervin, p 102 ) Influences on Behaviors: The influences on my behavior of this adorning date are alloyed at best. I am able of administration my thoughts, animosity and assignment with others, but I generally accept to accumulate to myself. Generally I am anti-social. I am a admixture of anytime alert and anytime empathetic. I choose, at times, to allotment all or annihilation of myself with others.
I am accurate with who I admit in but at the aforementioned time who I do admit in I allotment too abundant of myself. I am actual authoritative and don’t like to allotment my accurate animosity and affections best of the time. I generally feel abhorrence that bodies will not accept or like me if they knew how I absolutely acquainted and thought. Influences on Relationships: The abhorrence of not actuality accepted and activity anti-social for the best allotment has kept me from accepting abounding friends. When I was adolescent I did not date a lot maybe because of this aforementioned thing. I don’t feel adequate with cogent my best claimed cocky with bodies in general.
This relates to my adolescence and the corruption I suffered through at the easily of my footfall brother. Additionally because of the animal corruption that I was put through by my babysitter’s babe acquired a accepted apprehension of people. I generally feel abandoned and threatened about men and women if I am not in absolute ascendancy and on my bouncer at all times. Abrogating and Absolute Outcomes: A absolute aftereffect of this date is how it has accustomed me abundant empathy; and that I am able to accept affectionate relationships with women, admitting not animal in nature, I am added adequate about them.
I am able to allotment my thoughts and animosity with women and children, I am able to affix with them and accept to them. Abrogating outcomes are in that I am not able to advance abutting accord with alternative guys. I accept abandoned myself from all bodies except ancestors and a few baddest accompany that I accept accepted for years. Erikson, in the case of Abreast against Intimacy, should abrogating outcomes persist, states, “If these issues are not bound during this time, the alone is, in after life, abounding with a faculty of despair: Activity is too short, and it is too backward to alpha all over again” (Cervone & Pervin, p 103).
I disagree with this assumption. I accept that these issues can be bound and addressed after in life. It absolutely depends on the individual. I am 30 years of age and accept been ambidextrous with these issues for best of my life, and will best acceptable abide to assignment on them. Alternative Adorning Influences: The best constant and prevailing influences on my personality development is the corruption I suffered as a child. Admitting the sixth date is the best accustomed date of my accepted development, I additionally abatement into the additional date of Erikson’s approach which is the Freedom against abashment and agnosticism stages.
This brings about mostly abrogating outcomes such as abashment and self-doubt. I additionally feel answerability over what I accomplished as a adolescent and answerability in not actuality able to assure my sister and brother. Admitting logically I apperceive that there was annihilation I could do to assure them as I was a adolescent too, it does not abate the actuality that my behaviors, relationships with my brother and sister and animosity are afflicted by the answerability and shame. In cessation aloof because we are of assertive age it does not beggarly that we are in the Erkisonians date of development. Mentally we ability be abaft and in some instances we ability be advanced due to activity experiences.
Due to abounding accomplished adventures the stages of my development accept been adapted and are not area I should be. Can we anytime bolt up to our adapted date of development? Maybe we can with the advice of professionals and a lot of dedication. I accept abstruse how to cope with aggregate and little by little I am area I appetite to be. My activity is blessed as of now, alike admitting I backpack all of these accomplished adventures with me I alone acquiesce for these to alone accomplish me a stronger being and debris to anytime put anybody or acquiesce for anybody to acquaintance what I did.
Lastly the absorbed of this cardboard was to appearance how Erikson’s stages of psychosocial personality development activated to me. A description of my accepted claimed psychosocial date of development was discussed. I additionally discussed the influences on behaviors, relationships as able-bodied as abrogating and absolute outcomes of my date of psychosocial development. Finally I discussed how Erikson’s additional date of psychosocial development afflicted my personality.
Order a unique copy of this paper