Unit 5 is about Ethics, which belongs to AXIOLOGY, as annex of Philosophy ambidextrous with VALUES of RIGHT or WRONG. Our assemblage 5 altercation will focus on the affair of WHAT IS GOOD? vs WHAT IS RIGHT? Often moral agents approved to accomplish decisions based on the good---rather than what is right. Relate based on your acquaintance this issue. What is the bases for your moral decisions? THE GOOD or WHAT IS RIGHT? Share your thoughts to others about this. What do you anticipate is the moral after-effects of accomplishments back we based our decisions on the GOOD rather than what is right? AFTER POSTING YOU CAN DO REPLIES TO TWO OF YOUR CLASSMATES POSTS. PLEASE WRITE YOUR IDEAS BY FOLLOWING THE GUIDE QUESTIONS BELOW FOR THIS DISCUSSION:
1. HOW DO I DECIDE IN MORALITY? SHALL I JUDGE BASED ON WHAT IS GOOD? OR SHALL I JUDGE BASED ON WHAT IS RIGHT? WHY? SUPPORT YOUR STANCE.
2. HOW TO ACHIEVE THE GOOD AND THE RIGHT? Aristotle believed that "moral activities (of person) are animal par excellence" --meaning: acting about is accomplished announcement of what it is to be human. Aristotle's abstraction of acceptable activity emphasizing BEING GOOD FIRST. This is his acknowledgment to his adept Plato. Plato believes "knowing the acceptable first, for one to do the good." Thus, Plato believes that benightedness to the acceptable makes one does evil. Aristotle reacted on Plato's argument. He proposes, "being acceptable aboriginal (person who is good/ with appearance aboriginal by HABITUATION/by practice) makes one does the good. It is the appearance is at pale and important, not the activity itself nor ability of the acceptable itself. Cite examples why ability of the acceptable does not agreement of accomplishing the good. Kant on the otherhand uses the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE--THE RIGHT THING IS OUGHT TO BE DONE, EVEN IT MAY NOT BE GOOD FOR YOU.
WRITE YOUR POST (10 PTS) ON THE FIRST 2 DAYS OF UNIT CALENDAR AND WRITE YOUR REPLIES FOR 2 OF YOUR CLASSMATES AFTERWARDS (10 PTS).
Order a unique copy of this paper