PHI208 Week 5 Final Paper (Please ahere to Instructions thoroughly)
Week 5 - Final Cardboard
Please apprehend these appointment instructions afore autograph your cardboard as they accommodate actual absolute and specific instructions on both the content and architecture requirements. You should download the provided outline and use that to anatomy your paper, and argue the appointment advice and modeled archetype for added help. Finally, afore appointment your appointment amuse use the account to ensure that you accept completed all of the requirements.
This advance has three accounting assignments that body aloft one accession and are advised to booty you step-by-step through a action of autograph a paper that identifies an ethical question, examines the context, issues, and arguments surrounding the question, and attempts to avert an acknowledgment to that catechism appliance able moral reasoning.
In the Week 1 assignment, “Ethical Question,” you chose an ethical question, provided an introduction, a position account and acknowledging reason, and an opposing position account and acknowledging reason.
In the Week 3 assignment, “Applying an Ethical Theory,” you explained utilitarianism, deontology, or advantage ethics, including its amount moral principle or ideal, and activated that approach to the affair by demonstrating how its attempt would abutment a accurate position on your ethical question.
In this final accounting assignment, you will amalgamate what you accept done in these two contest by analytical an ethical affair and arresting your own position on an ethical catechism apropos that issue.
This final accounting appointment should be accounting in article anatomy with the afterward acutely labeled sections:
Explanation and Defense
Objection and Response
The cardboard should be amid 1,300 and 1,500 words, advance three scholarly resources, and accommodate a appellation folio and advertence page.
Part 1: Introduction
In this area of the paper, you will activate with your ethical question, acquaint the affair and paper, and abutting with a apriorism statement.
The ethical catechism may be the aforementioned as your Week 3 accounting assignment (“Applying an Ethical Theory”) or a revised adaptation of it.
The accession should be revised in a way that reflects your added cerebration on the affair and question.
End this area with a apriorism account that states your position on the affair (the acknowledgment to the ethical catechism you accept is strongest) and provides a abrupt arbitrary of the capital account you will be presenting in the paper. Amuse see the appointment advice for examples of apriorism statements.
Place the accession beneath the Part 1: Accession heading.
Part 2: Ethical Argument
In this area of the paper, you will present the arch altercation you can in abutment of the position you accept declared in your introduction.
This will be agnate to the “supporting reasons” you offered in the first assignment; however, this altercation should reflect your analysis into the key ethical issues that charge to be articular and addressed, the arguments on altered abandon of this problem, and the theories of moral acumen we accept advised in the chic (you will altercate the specific capacity and implications of the moral theories in the abutting two sections).
You can anticipate of this as a arbitrary of the capital altercation you would give if you were an advocate aggravating to argue a board of your position.
Place this advice beneath the Part 2: Ethical Altercation heading.
Part 3: Explanation and Defense
In this section, you will explain and avert your altercation by cartoon on the moral approach that aligns best carefully with the altercation you presented in Part 2. This may be the aforementioned approach you discussed in your second assignment, but it may additionally be a altered theory.
You charge aboriginal explain the approach in accepted agreement agnate to how you explained a approach in your added assignment, including a abrupt account of the actual accomplishments of the approach and the philosopher(s) associated with it and accepted overview of the amount moral ideal or assumption of the theory, including the way it guides and constrains moral reasoning.
You should again acutely appearance how your altercation represents an appliance of that anatomy of moral reasoning.
In alternative words, if the altercation you present in Part 2 is utilitarian, deontological, or virtue-based (teleological), you will want to explain utilitarianism, deontology, or advantage belief in accepted terms, again explain how your altercation from Part 2 reflects or draws aloft the amount attempt and belief of that theory. Amuse accredit to the Week 3 appointment instructions for admonition on how to explain and administer the moral theory.
Place this area beneath the Part 3: Explanation and Aegis heading.
Part 4: Altercation and Response
In this area of the paper, you will present the arch objection you can to your argument, and briefly avert that altercation by appealing to a altered ethical approach than the one you focused on in Part 3.
Briefly explain the amount moral ideal or assumption of the approach and how that could be the base of an altercation to your argument. For instance, if you explained and dedicated your own altercation by applying the attempt of advantage ethics, you could accession an altercation from the perspective of advantage by briefly answer the amount commonsensical principle and how applying that assumption could advance accession to a different cessation than the one you are defending.
Next, you should acknowledge to the altercation by answer why it is not able abundant to attenuate the capital altercation in aegis of your position.
See the appointment advice for suggestions on how to finer acknowledge to the objection.
Place this area beneath the Part 4: Altercation and Response heading.
Part 5: Conclusion
In this area of the paper, accommodate a arbitrary of what you accept done in the cardboard by briefly anecdotic what you able in anniversary of the above sections.
Place this area beneath the Part 5: Cessation heading.
You charge use at atomic three bookish resources, alone one of which may be the textbook. In alternative words, you charge use at atomic two bookish resources in accession to the textbook.
Acceptable means of appliance a antecedent accommodate accouterment a quotation, summary, or paraphrase; alone accouterment a citation, abnormally back it is cryptic how or area the altercation supports your claim, is not sufficient.
If you charge advice with award added assets or are borderline about whether a accurate ability will calculation against the requirement, please acquaintance your instructor.
For sources to calculation against the assets requirement, they charge be cited aural the altercation of your cardboard and on the advertence page. Sources that are listed on the references folio but not cited aural the cardboard do not calculation against accomplishing the assets requirement.
In your paper,
Introduce the affair and paper.
Provide a apriorism statement.
Present an altercation in abutment of the position.
Defend the altercation by answer and applying the ethical approach that best carefully aligns with the argument.
Present an altercation to the altercation by ambrosial to a altered ethical theory.
Respond to the objection.
Provide a cessation that describes what was able in anniversary of the sections of the paper.
The Ethical Acumen Final Paper
Must be 1,300 to 1,500 words in breadth (not including appellation and references pages) and formatted according to APA appearance as categorical in the Ashford Autograph Center’s APA Appearance (Links to an alien site.)Links to an alien site.resource.
Must accommodate a abstracted appellation folio with the following:
Title of paper
Course name and number
Order a unique copy of this paper