You will accept 1 commodity from a peer advised journal related to a affair that aligns with the advance objectives. Please assay the acquaint articulation in the activity tab on Blackboard to actuate area to locate associate advised account articles. You may appetite to abstain analytical reviews, abstruse reviews, meta-analyses or qualitative studies as these will not accommodate able-bodied to the appraisal process.
You will alarmingly review 1 peer advised article related to nutrition.
Address all believability acutely and concisely to break aural the folio limit. When appointment this you will additionally charge to attach the aboriginal commodity that you are reviewing. Use the bead off articulation to attach both files.
At minimum your appraisal should abode these elements:
0.5 pt – APA commendation of article
Section 1 – Elements influencing the believability of the research:
0.5 pt – Autograph Style – call the autograph style
0.5 pt – Author(s), believability of the author(s)
0.5 pt – Address appellation – does the appellation bout the report? length? attracting?
1.5 pts - Abstruse – does the abstruse abridge the assay question, methods, abstracts analysis, after-effects and conclusion?
Section 2 – Elements influencing the robustness of the research:
2.5 pts – Purpose/research botheration - What is the assay botheration or assay hypothesis? Is the botheration acutely identified? Is the acceptation of the botheration acclaimed and described? Does the cardboard analyze the aim of the study? Is there a bright articulation amid the conceptual approach and the assay question? Is the abstraction practical?
1 pts – Analytic bendability – is there acceptable flow? Organization? Are account presented acutely and able-bodied defined?
2.5 pts – Abstruse assay - Call the assay of the literature. Are the references up to date? How is the abstruse organized? Do antecedent studies advance against the abstraction or assay question? Is the account and administration for the abstraction adumbrated in the lit review?
1.5 pts – Abstract Framework – Are any models, theories, constructs acclimated or presented in the development of the framework for this study? Is it logical?
1.5 pts – Aims/objectives – are the aims of the abstraction able-bodied established? Does this adjust with the abstract framework?
2 pts – Sample – who, sample size, exclusion criteria, admittance criteria, generalizability to the population
2 pts - Ethical Consideration – does the abstraction call ethical concerns? IRB approval, accomplish described?
1 pts - Operational Definitions – are new terms, definitions acutely authentic in a analytic address for the reader?
3 pts - Methodology – what were the methods? Can you carbon this study? Are there any apropos with the methods?
2 pts - Abstracts analysis/results – call the abstracts assay procedures and after-effects – were any after-effects significant?
2 pts – Discussion/Conclusion – does the altercation add to the affair and the after-effects section? Does this accommodate implications for added research? Does the cessation altercate limitations of the study?
0.5 pt – References – were references up to date, from aboveboard source