NURS 6241: STRATEGIC PLANNING IN HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS – Discussion 4 (Grading Rubic And Media Attached)

Discussion: Identifying and Engaging Stakeholders for Cardinal Planning

Stakeholders can facilitate the success, or failure, of a cardinal plan.

Identifying centralized and alien stakeholders and architecture advantageous relationships should be an advised and well-conceived allotment of the cardinal planning process. As a assistant leader-manager complex in cardinal planning, it is important that you accede who could be impacted by a proposed change and how the change may affect individuals’ roles, responsibilities, and relationships. It is additionally basic to anticipate about which stakeholders may be able to action expertise, capital, and/or amplitude to advice exercise the cardinal plan and accomplish buy-in.

In this Discussion, you analyze stakeholders who can abetment with accustomed advanced a cardinal plan.

Your Instructor has assigned you to a baby accumulation for this Discussion. Craft your stakeholder description independently; through the accommodating barter that follows, you will action anniversary alternative suggestions for refinement. As in Weeks 2 and 3, use this baby accumulation Discussion to burrow acutely into the concepts actuality presented as they are basal to this course.

To prepare:

Reflect on a planned change accomplishment you accept experienced.

Consider the afterward questions:

  • How do you anticipate stakeholder captivation may accept impacted the aftereffect of this planned change?
  • Were the adapted stakeholders involved? Did the stakeholders advice to backpack out the plan as needed?
  • Should alternative stakeholders accept been engaged? If so, how could relationships with added stakeholders accept been able to bigger abutment the plan?
  • How does absorption on this instance of planned change acquaint your angle on what is bare to appoint stakeholders to auspiciously advance alternative cardinal changes?

Review the Mountain View Bloom Center case study, and reflect on the focus of your postings in the Anniversary 2 Discussion 2 and the Anniversary 3 Discussion.

Conduct added analysis as all-important to strengthen your compassionate of the action of involving stakeholders in cardinal planning and to deepen your cerebration about the organization. For instance, you may analysis organizations with similarities to Mountain View, and appraise advice accompanying to stakeholder involvement.

Consider the afterward questions:

  • Which centralized and alien stakeholders should be complex in cardinal planning accompanying to this case study?
  • What assets and/or perspectives would anniversary of these stakeholders action to the process?
  • What role would anniversary abeyant stakeholder comedy in allowance to move advanced a cardinal plan?
  • When and how should the stakeholders become involved?
  • How would you breed relationships with these stakeholders to aftermath the best accessible results?
  • How would the adapted alternative of stakeholders and their captivation advance the likelihood of acknowledged acceptance and accomplishing of a cardinal plan?

Post a description of centralized and alien stakeholders who should be complex in cardinal planning at Mountain View Bloom Center. Propose strategies for cultivating relationships with these stakeholders. Explain how their captivation would advance the likelihood of success for the cardinal plan.

Read a alternative of your colleagues’ responses.

Respond to at atomic two of your colleagues on two altered canicule by allegory the alternative of stakeholders and the strategies categorical for engagement.

Required Readings

Sare, M. V., & Ogilvie, L. (2010). Cardinal planning for nurses: Change administration in bloom care. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Chapter 6, “Strategic Planning: Why It’s Not Just for the Boardroom Anymore” (pp. 105–115)

Chapter 11, “Eight Cautionary Tales of Cardinal Planning” (pp. 215–226)

Note: You are alone appropriate to apprehend the “Hail, Hail, the Gang Is Not All Here” area of the affiliate this week.

These capacity abode stakeholder captivation in cardinal planning.

Galunic, C., & Hermreck, I. (2012). How to advice advisers ‘get’ strategy. Harvard Business Review, 90(12), 24.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

This commodity addresses the access of chief management/leadership on employees’ compassionate of and charge to authoritative strategy.

Harmon, R. B., Fontaine, D., Plews-Ogan, M., & Williams, A. (2012). Achieving transformational change: Using beholden analysis for cardinal planning in a academy of nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing, 28(2), 119–124.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

The authors altercate stakeholder captivation and alternative aspects of the cardinal planning action affianced in by the University of Virginia Academy of Nursing.

Murphy-Hoefer, R., Andrade, M. S., Maines, D. E., & Martin, M. (2011). Stakeholder ascribe in establishing an appraisal plan for tobacco counter-marketing campaigns. American Journal of Bloom Education, 42(2), 66–73.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

As you apprehend this article, accede how stakeholder captivation may accord to acknowledged cardinal planning.

Required Media

 Laureate Education (Producer). (2013b). Case study: Mountain View Bloom Center [Interactive media]. Retrieved from CDN database. (NURS 6241)

This alternate multimedia allotment presents a case abstraction of an organization, with advice about the types of activities performed there, authoritative structure, cardinal priorities, and banking allocations. You will use this as a ability for this week’s Discussion

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal
Order now and a get a 25% discount with the discount code: COURSEGUYOrder Now!
+ +