Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths
ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? Graduate School of Business MARKETING MANAGEMENT 555 ASSIGNMENT 2 Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? Actual Count: 3624 (Excluding cover, capacity and advertence pages) Page 0 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 2 Neural Correlates .............................................................................................................. Acceptance of Neuromarketing ................................................................................................. 8 Chargeless will & Controlling ........................................................................................... 9 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 11 REFERENCES:........................................................................................................................ 2 Page 1 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? INTRODUCTION Neuromarketing, argues Lee, Broderick, & Chamberlain (2007) is an arising interdisciplinary acreage that combines economics, neuroscience and psychology, with Neuromarketing actuality appellation aloof six years ago says Smidts (2002). The ambition of neuromarketing suggests Laybourne & Lewis, (2005) and Smidts (2002) is to abstraction how the academician is physiologically afflicted by business strategies and advertising.
Brain action consistent from examination an advertisement is monitored and abstinent appliance neuroimaging techniques such as anatomic alluring resonance imaging (fMRI), as credible in Figure 1, and electroencephalography (EEG) is acclimated in adjustment to appraise the Figure 1 fMRI Angel capability of these strategies (Laybourne & Lewis 2005). McClure et al (2004) says neuromarketing studies usually admeasurement alternative amid articles in agreement of cast acquaintance or artefact preference.
As a eyewitness may authority a bookish bent in acceptable business studies, measures such as the artefact alternative for a authentic advertisement is sometimes difficult to admeasurement argues Schaefer, Berens, Heinze, & Rotte (2006). Walter, Abler, Ciaramidaro, & Erk, (2005) advance in neuromarketing studies, cast acquaintance and artefact alternative accept been activated with neural activity. Further, customer aegis groups and academics appearance the acreage of neuromarketing with absorption due to the accessible ethical implications of designing advertisements to carefully account specific acoustic furnishings (Commercial Alert, 2003).
Laybourne & Lewis (2005) and Smidts (2002) says anatomic alluring resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) are built-in neuromarketing are neuroimaging techniques and comprise the neuroscience aspect of the field. fMRI requires a actor to lay on a bed, with their arch amid central the arena of a scanner. Advisers can admeasurement the neural action throughout the academician in agreement of claret breeze via oxygen acceptance by ecology the participant? s academician with fMRI. As a adverse for this address advisers can additionally use EEG accessories as it is adequately carriageable and light. Appliance abundant electrodes that are placed on the articipant? s attic in a Figure 2 Academician Cap Page 2 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? net-like fashion, as credible in Figure 2, EEGs can admeasurement academician action by assessing electrical action at the scalp. Appliance both behavioural responses as able-bodied as neural activations Fugate (2007) says advisers are able to use neuroimaging to adviser and conduct business studies of the participant? s response. Fugate (2007) explains neuromarketing as actuality the action that involves allurement capacity to accomplish beginning tasks and ascendancy tasks whilst actuality active to assorted cyberbanking devices.
Researchers are able to analyze differences in the images produced during the agnate tasks as the accessories accomplish instant, colourful images of a alive brain. Advisers are afresh able to see what genitalia of the academician accept responded to the stimuli acclimated (Fugate 2007). Fugate (2007) describes the mechanics abaft neuromarketing, as a anarchy in the marketing, however, Fugate (2007) has disregarded some analytical authentic concepts, accurately the aftereffect attributes to neuromarketing research. Nneuromarketing as a abstraction suggests Smidts (2002) emerged above-mentioned to the chat absolutely actuality acclimated in 2002, admitting suggestions otherwise.
Many studies lacked the spatial resolution to accomplish any advantageous claims as to the mechanisms abaft able and abortive announcement techniques due to limitations of neuroimaging techniques conducted in the accomplished few decades (Smidts 2002). An archetype argues Reeves, Lang, Thorson, and Rothschild (1989), is their affirmation that in an EEG abstraction television scenes with abrogating agreeable causes activation of the aboveboard allocation of the appropriate hemisphere while absolute letters account greater larboard hemisphere action in the aboveboard region.
It is important to calendar that as alone four electrodes were acclimated (in accession to the two advertence electrodes) cortical activation was alone monitored in agreement of aboveboard against occipital (Reeves, Lang, Thorson, and Rothschild 1989). Now days, EEG systems are abundant added absolute and about accept up to 256 electrodes to adviser academician activity. Abounding alternative studies from the aforementioned time aeon by Krugman, (1971); Rothschild, Hyun, Reeves, Thorson, & Goldstein (1988); Rothschild & Hyun (1990); Weinstein, Appel, & Weinstein (1980) additionally apply „hemisphere? activations as key findings.
Nonetheless, advance Weinstein et al (1980) it is not the actuality that beforehand analysis in „neuromarketing? has been estimated that is of greatest importance, but rather how bound the acreage has acquired over the aftermost few years. Page 3 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? Conditioning & Business Two methods are about active in neuromarketing analysis as agency of evaluating an individual? s alternative amid products: artefact alternative and cast familiarity. Artefact Alternative Artefact alternative comparisons absorb two accepted brands or products, which is clashing cast familiarity.
Walter et al. (2005) uses an archetype of macho participants actuality asked to amount a car? s looks behindhand of amount and applied requirements, accustomed the best amid a aerial achievement sports vehicle, a midsized agent and a baby car. Participants ranked the sports car first, followed by the med-sized car, with the baby car ranked last. Walter et al (2005) appropriate the sports cars as a primary reinforcer for amusing dominance, apery independence, adeptness and speed. In this example, the sports car acted as a accessory reward.
Money or cultural appurtenances are accessory rewards that reinforce behaviour alone afterwards above-mentioned learning, through associations with primary rewards (innate reinforcers including food, water, and animal stimuli). The three capital functions of rewards as categorical by Walter et al (2005) can: (a) abet absolute effect, (b) abet acquirements via absolute reinforcement, and (c) abet arresting behaviour for accepting the reward. Sports cars are preferred, as credible from the abstraction conducted by Walter et al (2005), as they associate with primary rewards that we innately seek.
They additionally represents characteristics that we apperceive our adeptness values. Morgan et al (2002), as cited by Walter et al, (2005) say this abstraction was additionally acclimatized from a antecedent abstraction of ascendancy and amusing bureaucracy involving prime mates. In short, accustomed two identifiable products, alternative will be accustomed appear one over the other, which is due primarily to the adopted artefact accepting added reinforcing qualities in agreement of accessory reinforcers we analyze as actuality accordant at a alone level, as able-bodied as to our cultural heritage. (Walter et al 2005) Cast Acquaintance Comparisons amid amiliar and alien articles are authentic as cast acquaintance (Campbell and Keller 2003). Back a customer aboriginal sees an advertisement for an alien cast Campbell and Keller (2003) advance they feel abrogating ambiguity appear it as it is unfamiliar. However, alliteration of an announcement message, argues Campbell and Keller (2003), Page 4 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? at low levels, decreases this ambiguity and increases the effectiveness. One way that articles can acquire the assurance of the customer and become added familiar, advance Fugate (2007), is through the use of celebrity endorsements.
Repeated exposures can abatement the capability of the advertisement by annoying the viewer, argues Campbell & Keller (2003), so accordingly advertisers charge accumulate in apperception not to acquaint too much. Consumers can alone abundance adeptness for the familiar, but not the unfamiliar, so afresh exposures for an already accustomed artefact provides added time for the customer to action the advertisement and their associated adventures from appliance the artefact (Fugate 2007). Customer can become apathetic and alike affronted added calmly for alien brands as there is beneath adeptness to action (Fugate 2007).
Therefore, for consumers to recognise a new cast entering into the markets Campbell & Keller (2003) advance they charge to be bourgeois in their business efforts by not amplify it. Added identifiable brands, such as Pepsi, are able to acquaint added about with beneath affair of annoying their admirers argues Campbell & Keller (2003). Neural Correlates A key assumption of neuromarketing, advance Damasio (1996), is that it is based on award a neural correlates for affairs consumers such as artefact alternative and cast familiarity.
As best studies are alone able to adviser neural action observationally it is important to accede that advisers are alone able to seek a associate and do not abet artefact alternative via neural dispatch (Damasio 1996). Interestingly, associate advised affirmation has been begin bond cast acquaintance and artefact alternative with the centermost prefrontal cortex, says Damasio (1996). The centermost prefrontal case (mPFC), advance Damasio (1996), is a athenaeum of linkages amid bioregulatory states and absolute knowledge.
In the added specific instance of announcement , this translates into adventures and artefact advice actuality affiliated to absolute effect, via the mPFC (Damasio 1996). IMAGE 1. mPFC Studies by Kable and Glimcher (2007) point to the centermost prefrontal case (mPFC) as the locus of absorption for neuromarketing studies are absolutely notable. As categorical in the sports car abstraction beforehand Walter et al (2005) admonish artefact alternative has been activated with the activation of Page 5 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? several academician regions in the accolade chip of the brain, including the mPFC.
Preference has additionally been activated with mPFC action absolute of prices argues Knutson, Rick, Wimmer, Prelec, & Loewenstein (2007) and was begin to be predictive of consecutive purchasing. Studies by Paulus & Frank (2003) empiric back appliance a beheld bigotry assignment as a ascendancy they begin ancillary after-effects back a simpler alternative judgement abstraction was conducted. McClure et al. (2004) conducted one of the best acute neuromarketing studies. Advisers administering a abstraction monitored neural action back bubbler either Coca-Cola or Pepsi (see Figure 3).
Using an fMRI for an agreement McClure et al (2004) had two conditions, (a) brand-cued delivery, and (b) dark aftertaste test. Back administering a dark aftertaste test, academician action amid the Coca-Cola and Pepsi was empiric as actuality about identical. However, in the brand-cued condition, cogent differences were empiric in with neural activity, primarily in the ventromedial prefrontal case (McClure et al 2004). Figure 3 Coke Vs Pepsi The cogent ascertainment was no neural activation differences were articular back no cast nformation was provided, but back brands were identified, artefact alternative and cast acquaintance came into comedy with Coca-Cola actuality about adopted by the participants, which acquired decidedly added action in the ventromedial prefrontal case arena of the academician says McClure et al (2004). An important aspect of the abstraction is that no choices are fabricated by the participant; the bendable alcohol were accustomed to the participants in the fMRI in baby quantities; the abetment was based back the cast was aboriginal announced; the award was based on the activated regions on the academician as abstinent by the fMRI.
Brand alternative and antecedent conditioning is alone approved in brand-cued delivery, and alone afresh is there cogent ventromedial prefrontal case activation. Koenigs & Tranel (2008) in a aftereffect to the McClure et al (2004) abstraction afford added ablaze on the absurdity of cola preference. Koenigs and Tranel (2008) explain that capacity tend to adopt Pepsi over Coca-Cola, or accept no reliable preference, in a blind-taste test, yet Coca-Cola consistently Page 6 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? outsells Pepsi accordingly creating a Pepsi paradox.
When cast advice is available, CocaCola is preferred, however, back cast advice is not provided, no reliable preferences can be made, which is creating the absurdity (Koenigs and Tranel 2008). Cola alternative was counterbalanced in the McClure et al (2004) study. Koenigs and Tranel (2008) activated predictions from antecedent studies by appliance participants with damaged prefrontal cortex. Koenigs and Tranel (2008) credible that back patients are presented with cast information, it makes no aberration on their preferences.
The cessation was this award mirrors furnishings begin in accustomed individuals accommodating in blind-taste tests. Gladwell (2005) advance the able cast angel of Coca-Cola, not taste, is the acumen Coca-Cola is adopted over Pepsi. Several studies accept affiliated cast acquaintance with mPFC. Schaefer et al (2006) and Schaefer & Rotte (2007) address that back comparing accustomed and alien articles with mPFC action differences in neural action are detected, which can additionally be affiliated to neurolearning abstract of change apprehension in rat bane studies advance Dias & Honey (2002). Campbell and Keller (2003) advance about to behavioural principles, cast acquaintance is of acute accent to advertisers. Abhorrence the alien pushed consumers away, and in advertising, this abhorrence creates ambiguity for artefact that after-effects in consumers selecting a accepted product. For culturally accustomed brands about to alien brands Schaefer and Rotte (2007) authenticate this as above aboveboard action and added mPFC. In short, studies conducted McClure et al (2004), Paulus & Frank (2003), Walter et al (2005) accept affiliated centermost prefrontal case (mPFC) activation to alternative judgements.
Further, Schaefer et al (2006) and Schaefer & Rotte (2007) advance mPFC can be attributed to the alternative for the accustomed over the unfamiliar, bold that the customer is action to buy a artefact either way (i. e. a vehicle). Preferences amid the accessible choices in agreement of their about value, suggests Montague (2008), is the abutting footfall in the customer accommodation making. Consumers can appraise their choices by acceptance the pros and cons of all the accessible choices (Montague 2008). Analysis by Sutherland (2004) shows that this action is primarily undertaken by the centermost prefrontal cortex, which some accept dubbed the „liking centre? f the brain. Several alternative areas accept been active as key academician regions accordant to neuromarketing research, advance Walter et al (2005), alternative than the centermost prefrontal cortex. Some of these Page 7 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? regions accommodate the belly striatum, amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex, (Walter et al 2005). The belly striatum says Knutson et al (2007), Walter et al (2005), is the accolade centermost of the academician and has been activated with self-reported cocky activation but alone as an indicator of the predicted amount of the reward.
This is acclimated as a apparatus for acquirements as it is anticipation of as anticipation error. The amygdale says Walter et al (2005) has additionally been activated with accolade acuteness in neuromarketing studies, however, is frequently accepted for its role in processing affecting information. The orbitofrontal case (OFC), says Walter et al (2005), consists of mainly two regions: the crabbed and centermost (and is mainly anticipation of as a admeasurement of preference. The centermost OFC is activated by advantageous stimuli, which includes the centermost prefrontal cortex. Crabbed OFC action is activated with backbreaking stimuli.
The use of neuroimaging is not bound to neural activation measures says Fugate (2007). For example, in agreement of hormonal secretions such as dopamine neuroimaging quantitatively admeasurement this affect (Fugate, 2007). Admitting the acreage is accretion rapidly there is abundant to ascertain in agreement of neural correlates and absorption to neuromarketing, suggests Fugate (2007). Acceptance of Neuromarketing In adjustment to enhance a bartering accretion a above affair for analysis in neuromarketing is the ethical apropos of neuroimaging. Neuromarketing is boilerplate abreast accessible to acquiesce advisers to architecture a business campaign, so addictive that overrides an individual? chargeless will. Founded or unfounded apropos are actuality allayed apropos this. A customer aegis accumulation in America, accepted as Customer Alert, has filed complaints to the US federal government, as able-bodied as a US assembly committee, and universities, agitation the acceptance of neuromarketing. Customer Active accept neuromarketing as “find[ing] a buy button central the skull” (Commercial Active 2003, 1). Bartering Active (2003, 3) claims: “Our accouchement are adversity from amazing levels of obesity, blazon 2 diabetes, anorexia, bulimia, and dissection gambling, while millions will eventually die from the business of tobacco. According to Customer Active (2003), the acceleration of neuromarketing will accompany an end to chargeless will. Lee et al (2007, 202) advance “Unfortunately, the almost buried antipathy for the abstraction of „neuromarketing? in the neuroscience abstract is acutely based on the assessment that business analysis is a bartering action absolutely advised to advertise articles to the public... ” which abounding Page 8 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? academics are additionally afraid to embrace (Thompson, 2003).
Neuroscience academics tend to focus on added medically accordant questions, admitting there are abounding journals committed to economics and business (Thompson, 2003). As such, some accept that “brain imaging will be acclimated in agency that borrow claimed aloofness to a absolutely unacceptable degree” (Editorial, 2004b, 71). An bearding columnist in Attributes Neuroscience, took a agnate stance, adage “Neuromarketing is little added than a new fad exploited by scientists and business consultants to dark accumulated audience with science. ” (Laybourne & Lewis 2005, 29). Neuromarketing analysis may advice abate the problems aloft by Bartering Active (2003).
For example, Montague, Hyman, & Cohen (2004) say, by analytical the differences amid the academician action of besetting overpurchasers may advice to accept why these besetting individuals tend to absorb alfresco of their means. In addition, it can accommodate advantageous advice for how clinicians amusement these disorders by attractive at the correlations amid affairs behaviour and analytic disorders. For example, the accolade chip of the academician and in value-based decisionmaking and the centermost prefrontal case are absolutely important says Montague, Hyman, & Cohen (2004).
Two cogent ethical issues are present in neuromarketing analysis argues Murphy, Illes, and Reiner (2008), being: (a) aegis of customer freedom if neuromarketing alcove analytical effectiveness, and (b) absorption accessible parties from harm. To mitigate, recommendations for a „code of ethics? to be adopted by the neuromarketing industry are proposed by Murphy et al (2008). Some of the recommendations accommodate (1) authentic representation of authentic methods to businesses and the media, (2) abounding acknowledgment of ethical attempt acclimated in the study, and (3) absorption analysis capacity from any coercion.
Free will & Controlling Murphy et al (2008) suggests that if neuromarketing anytime does adeptness analytical capability afresh the apropos of Bartering Active (2003) may not be unfounded afterwards all as neuromarketing may borrow on an individual? s chargeless will. The accent of neuromarketing is not belted to neuroimaging, but additionally includes computational neuroscience, which is the abstraction of quantifying the basic accomplish that underlie a accustomed behavioural process. Value-based decision-making, for example, can be burst bottomward into bristles accomplish advance Rangel, Camerer, & Montague, (2008), Page 9 of 18
ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? which are: (1) anecdotic the accommodation problem; (2) acceptance the accessible choices; (3) authoritative a accommodation based aloft the appraisal of the choices available; (4) afterwards accustomed out the decision, accede the consistent consequences; and (5) apprentice from the controlling action in adjustment to accomplish bigger decisions in the future. Montague (2008, 584) says, “Viewed this way, it? s accessible to see why „free? best is an unconstructive way to anticipate the way bodies choose... ”.
Vohs & Schooler (2008) suggests that chargeless will and the adeptness to dispense acumen of it accept additionally afresh become apparent. However, it has been abounding years, suggests Libet, Gleason, Wright, & Pearl (1983) back neuroimaging studies accept appropriate that neural action does announce acquainted intention, abnormally if it can be monitored. The accommodation of whether or not to buy a artefact is a aftereffect of from acclimation the accretion of accepting the product, says Knutson et al (2007), account by the act of absolutely accepting to acquirement for the product, which is an coaction of agnate valuations and choices.
Using computational neuroscience, rather than neuroimaging, Walvis (2008), is able to affix neuroscience with accepted business principles. Walvis (2008) suggests three propositions of how the academician organises advice and states, “These three propositions action analogously to the base of an bogus neural arrangement model, implicating the accent of what alternative „elements? the cast is associated with, the backbone of these associations, and the arduous cardinal of associations that are present amid the cast and alternative „elements? in the network” (Walvis, 2008, 182).
These anatomy the basis, say (Walvis, 2008, 186) for the “Three Branding Laws”, based aloft how agreeable the branding ambiance is to the consumer, how repetitive and targeted the branding efforts are, and how alone accordant the brand? s business action is to the consumer. The stronger these pathways and access are, the added acceptable a accustomed artefact will be called by a consumer. We can afresh quantify factors complex in best behaviour, through the use of an bogus neural network, by appliance these laws says Walvis (2008).
Neuromarketing can abundantly advance business techniques back appliance a able neuroscientific base for branding, as appropriate by Walvis (2008), alike after the use of neuroimaging, but rather employing alternative aspects of neuroscience. Page 10 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? CONCLUSION Fugate (2007) suggests a anarchy will anon affected accepted bazaar analysis as a aftereffect of several key implications of neuromarketing. Advisers are bigger able to appraise an advertisement? s capability abundant added scientifically, back applying neuromarketing techniques, in agreement of how the ad affects the viewer? affecting accompaniment (i. e. , action or humour) as able-bodied as the viewer? s absorption to the ad. Artefact appeal, appropriate by Walter et al (2005) and the „sports car? abstraction are additionally articular with account to the allegation with the accolade chip of the brain. Neuromarketing was credible to be able to affix and quantify the furnishings of celebrity endorsements, appropriate by Fugate (2007) that links the audition and beheld stimuli of the celebrity as they account hormonal secretions in consumers that analyze with the artefact endorsement, which can advance to a absolute affecting acknowledgment and animosity of trust.
As researched by McClure et al (2004), logo/brand alternative and affecting adapter was credible to be cogent with consumers, which explained the aftereffect that Coca-Cola outperforms Pepsi. Alone time will acquaint how abundant of an aftereffect these new techniques will accept on business success as the approaching implications of neuromarketing appearance abundant potential. Neuromarketing, in its accepted stage, is by no agency able in chargeless if an advertisement is effective. Stimulating the centermost prefrontal case does not beggarly that an advertisement will be able as it is alone a aftereffect response.
The centermost prefrontal case arena of the academician is additionally the accountable of alternative analysis studies, which accommodate those in abhorrence conditioning as appropriate by Baratta, Lucero, Amat, Watkins, & Maier (2008), affront consistent in bistro disorders (Uher et al. , 2004), and affright responses (Day-Wilson, Jones, Southam, Cilia, & Totterdell, 2006). The acreage shows abundant affiance as actuality the abutting footfall in bazaar analysis admitting the accepted flaws in neuromarketing research.
Advertisers are acceptable to be added acknowledged in authoritative a best abiding consequence on the customer if they took advantage to the abounding attitude studies that accept been ahead conducted as they would be bigger able to absolute their efforts appear a ambition demographic. It is arguable if bigger business capabilities are acceptable or bad for the consumer; however, with acceptance actuality activated through legislation I feel we are seeing the acceptance of neuromarketing actuality debunked. Page 11 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? REFERENCES: Baratta, V. , Lucero, T. , Amat, J. , Watkins, L. & Maier, S. 2008. Role of the belly centermost prefrontal case in mediating behavioral control-induced abridgement of after conditioned fear. Acquirements & Memory, 15(2), 84–87. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Campbell, M. , & Keller, L. 2003. Cast acquaintance and ad alliteration effects. Journal of Customer Research, 30, 292–304. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Bartering Alert. 2003. Bartering active asks Emory University to arrest neuromarketing experiments. Bartering Active News Release. Page 12 of 18
ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? http://www. commercialalert. org/PDFs/neuromarketingrel. pdf accessed 26 February, 2011). Damasio, A. 1996. The actual cast antecedent and the accessible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical affairs of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological sciences, 351, 1413–1420. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Day-Wilson, K. , Jones, D. , Southam, E. , Cilia, J. , & Totterdell, S. 2006. Centermost prefrontal case aggregate accident in rats with abreast rearing-induced deficits in prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle.
Neuroscience, 141(3), 1113–1121. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Dias, R. , & Honey, R. C. 2002. Captivation of the rat centermost prefrontal case in change detection. Behavioral Neuroscience, 116(3), 498–503. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Editorial. 2004a. Academician scam? Attributes Neuroscience, 7(10), 1015. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Editorial. 2004b. Neuromarketing: above branding. The Lancet Neurology, 3, 71. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. urtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Fugate, D. L. 2007. Neuromarketing: a layman? s attending at neuroscience and its abeyant appliance to business practice. Journal of Customer Marketing, 24(7), 385–394. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Gladwell, M. 2005. Blink. New York: Time Warner Book Group. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Kable, J. W. , & Glimcher, P. W. 2007. The neural correlates of abstract amount during intertemporal choice. Attributes Neuroscience, 10(12), 1625–1633. http://proquest. mi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Page 13 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? Knutson, B. , Rick, S. , Wimmer, G. E. , Prelec, D. , & Loewenstein, G. 2007. Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53, 147–157. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Koenigs, M. , & Tranel, D. 2008. Prefrontal case accident abolishes brand-cued changes in cola preference. Amusing Bookish & Affective Neuroscience, 3(1), 1–6. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Krugman, H. 1971.
Brain beachcomber measures of media involvement. Journal of Announcement Research, 11, 3–9. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Laybourne, P. , & Lewis, D. 2005. Neuromarketing: the approaching of customer research? Admap, 461, 28–30. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Lee, N. , Broderick, A. J. , & Chamberlain, L. 2007. What is „neuromarketing?? A altercation and calendar for approaching research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63, 199–204. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011).
Libet, B. , Gleason, C. , Wright, E. , & Pearl, D. 1983. Time of acquainted ambition to act in affiliation to access of bookish action (readiness-potential). the benumbed admission of a advisedly autonomous act. Brain, 106(Pt 3), 623–642. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). McClure, S. , Li, J. , Tomlin, D. , Cypert, K. , Montague, L. , & Montague, P. 2004. Neural correlates of behavioral alternative for culturally accustomed drinks. Neuron, 44, 379– 387. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Montague, R. 2006.
Why accept this book? : How we accomplish decisions. Toronto: Penguin Group. Montague, R. 2008. Chargeless will. Accepted Biology, 18(4), R584–R585. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Page 14 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? Montague, R. , Hyman, S. , & Cohen, J. 2004. Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control. Nature, 431, 760–767. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Murphy, E. , Illes, J. , & Reiner, P. 2008. Neuroethics of neuromarketing. Journal of Customer Behavior, 7, 293–302. ttp://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Paulus, M. , & Frank, L. 2003. Ventromedial prefrontal case activation is analytical for alternative judgments. Neuroreport, 14, 1311–1315. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Rangel, A. , Camerer, C. , & Montague, P. R. 2008. A framework for acceptance the neurobiology of value-based accommodation making. Attributes Reviews Neuroscience, 9(7), 545–556. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Reeves, B. , Lang, A. , Thorson, E. , & Rothschild, M. 989. Affecting television scenes and hemispheric specialization. Animal Communication Research, 15(4), 493–508 http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Rothschild, M. , & Hyun, Y. 1990. Predicting anamnesis for apparatus of TV commercials from EEG. Journal of Customer Research, 16, 472–478. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Rothschild, M. , Hyun, Y. , Reeves, B. , Thorson, E. , & Goldstein, R. 1988. Hemispherically lateralized EEG as a acknowledgment to television commercials. Journal of Customer Research, 15, 185–198. ttp://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Schaefer, M. , & Rotte, M. 2007. Favorite brands as cultural altar attune accolade circuit. Neuroreport, 18, 141–145. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Page 15 of 18 ASSIGNMENT 2: Neuromarketing: Debunking the Myths? Schaefer, M. , Berens, H. , Heinze, H. , & Rotte, M. 2006. Neural correlates of culturally accustomed brands of car manufacturers. Neuroimage, 31, 861–865. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Sutherland, M. 004. Synopsis of appear neuromarketing studies. Neuroreport, 28, 15–18. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Thompson, C. 2003. There? s a accoutrement built-in in every centermost prefrontal cortex. Attributes Reviews Neuroscience, 6(3), 11-12. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Uher, R. , Murphy, T. , Brammer, M. , Dalgleish, T. , Phillips, M. , Ng, V. 2004. Centermost Prefrontal Case Action Associated With Symptom Affront in Bistro Disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(7), 1238–1246. http://proquest. mi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Vohs, K. , & Schooler, J. 2008. The amount of assertive in chargeless will: Encouraging a acceptance in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19(6), 49-54. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Walter, H. , Abler, B. , Ciaramidaro, A. , & Erk, S. 2005. Motivating armament of animal actions: Neuroimaging accolade and amusing interaction. Academician Analysis Bulletin, 67, 368–381. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Walvis, T. 2008.
Three laws of branding: Neuroscientific foundations of able cast building. Journal of Cast Management, 16, 176-194. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Weinstein, S. , Appel, V. , & Weinstein, C. 1980. Brain-activity responses to annual and television advertising. Journal of Announcement Research, 20(3), 57–63. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Welberg, L. 2007. Shopping centres in the brain. Attributes Reviews Neuroscience, 8(2), 84-85. http://proquest. umi. com. dbgw. lis. curtin. edu. au (accessed 26 February, 2011). Page 16 of 18
Order a unique copy of this paper