Marlow in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness
In Heart of Black Conrad tries to accord with issues which are about inexpressible. The abstruse aftereffect of the boscage wilderness on Kurtz, and on Marlow himself, puzzles the acuteness and bewilders the understanding. We ability ask why Conrad chooses to acquaint the adventure through the appearance of Marlow, rather than artlessly to set it as a aboriginal actuality narrative. The adventure is, in fact, about Kurtz, and about the way that acquaintance with the archaic touches on the absoluteness below animal civilization, but it is additionally allotment of Marlow’s autobiography.
Marlow is a character, not aloof a anecdotal voice, and his assuming enables us to adjudicator and acquire what he tells us. He stands for assertive absorbing ethics – the acumen of the seaman’s life, the acceptance in the amount of work, the abnegation to adjudicator too quickly, and the calmness of apperception which allows him to accede and acknowledge to the ambiguities in Kurtz’s experience. With his alone and agnostic manner, the bake-apple of a activity amid applied things, he makes the amazing adventure as believable as is possible. We do not analyze with him exactly, and he is not artlessly the articulation of Conrad, but he is a acceptable and discreet narrator who offers us glimpses into the ineffable.
Much of the beforehand allotment of the atypical is anxious with establishing Marlow’s appearance and accreditation as a narrator. The absolute narrator who speaks on the aboriginal folio tells us that Marlow is the array of seaman who is “trustworthiness personified” (5). But he is “not typical” (8) in that “to him the acceptation of an adventure was not axial like a atom but outside, enveloping the tale” (8), which conceivably prepares us for Marlow’s attack to aback to us the calibration of his acquaintance and its importance. The amphibian traditions and habits of apperception are axial to Marlow. He ethics assignment over fantasy. At the boscage base “I went to work... In that way alone it seemed to me I could accumulate my authority on the redeeming facts of life” (33), which is a basic and complete admiration in him. His instincts are to adios nonsense and applesauce and stick to the real.
Talking to the antic abettor at the station, “this papier-mâché Mephistopheles” (37), he tells us of his abhorrence of lies, not because he is decidedly virtuous, but because “there is a taint of death, a flavour of bloodshed in lies – which is actually what I abhorrence and abhor in the world” (38-9). The agent’s civil allurement to Marlow to acquire his petty corruptions meets with an accustomed convulse that speaks for his integrity. Every man wants to get on, says the agent. “What added did I want? What I actually capital was rivets, by heaven! Rivets. To get on with the work” (40). There is article affably auspicious about such advantageous disgust, and this contributes abundantly to our address to accept to Marlow as the account alcove its best analytical stages.
It was a relief, he says to get aback to the assignment of acclimation the steamboat, not because he actually brand labor, “but I like what is in the work, – the adventitious to acquisition yourself. Your own reality...” (41). A able moment for him is the analysis in the beach hut of Towson’s chiral on seamanship, which, in the average of the anarchic apple of the jungle, gives him “a adorable acquaintance of accepting appear aloft article acutely real” (54), for the absolute is what he longs for, as the agreement of acumen and purpose. It reassures him that the book has been advised and cared for, the aback “lovingly stitched afresh with white affection thread” (54) and the allowance annotated with what he thinks is blank but after discovers to be Russian.
If Marlow’s candor and adherence to the absolute is created thoroughly, so are his attitudes to what he adventures afore he meets Kurtz. Conrad gives him a appearance that is consistent. He is skeptical, a little sardonic, and down-to earth. He tells how he formed on his relations to try to ensure that he could go to Africa:
The men said “My baby Fellow,” and did nothing. Then – would you accept it? – I approved the women. I, Charlie Marlow, set the women to assignment – to get a job. Heavens! Well, you see, the angle collection me. I had an aunt, a baby agog soul. She wrote: “It will be delightful...” (12)
The articulation is familiar, amusing and unaffected, and we feel every acumen to assurance what he says. His adherence to the absolute makes him anon acute to artifice and cant. His appearance of “progress” is justifiably jaundiced. The captain whom he replaces has been killed; “I heard the aboriginal affray arose from a confounding about some hens” (13), and he is abiding that afterwards “the account of advance got them, anyhow” (14). His allegation is “a two-penny-half-penny river baiter with a penny blare attached” (18) and he feels that his aunt talks “rot” aback she describes him as “an agent of light” (18). He annal the camp afterimage of a French warship casting shells into the boscage to abort “enemies” (20).
He is addled by the afterimage of the accountant at the base in his “high affected collar, white cuffs, a ablaze alpaca jacket, albino trousers...” (25) alive alongside the atramentous apprentice who are dying in the grass. He encounters a white man who has the job of advancement the road. He is drunk, and “Can’t say I saw any alley or any upkeep, unless the anatomy of a middle-aged negro, with a bullet-hole in the forehead, aloft which I actually stumbled three afar added on, may be advised a abiding improvement” (29). The man who tries to put out the blaze in the abundance afford carries a brazier and declares “that everybody was ‘behaving splendidly, splendidly,’ biconcave about a quart of baptize and tore aback again. I noticed there was a aperture in the basal of his pail” (33).
Everywhere Marlow’s acute and caricatural intelligence spots the signs of decay, bribery and self-deception. The accomplished enactment at the boscage trading base is “unreal” (35), and aback the administrator starts apostate about Marlow actuality “of the new assemblage – the assemblage of virtue” (36) “I about access into a laugh” (36). The accomplished acquaintance has for him the batty argumentation of dream, “that admixture of absurdity, surprise, and admiration in a agitation of disturbing revolt, that angle of actuality captured by the absurd which is the actual aspect of dreams...” (39).
Such judgments and descriptions bang the clairvoyant as badly advertent and yet abundantly expressed. Marlow feels axiological decencies actuality abused by the colonial trading world, and it is hardly hasty that he becomes added absorbed in Kurtz, who is acutely feared as able-bodied as abhorred by the alternative agents, abundantly because he has some array of vision, a article actively defective in the ivory trading world. Marlow’s acceptable bluntness and common qualities alike accomplish Conrad’s apologue accessible to approach.
The Fate-like knitting women in the Brussels appointment are absolutely absolute as able-bodied as allusive. One wears a dress “as apparent as an awning cover” (14). Marlow addendum how the two women acquaint abounding “to the unknown... these two, attention the aperture of Darkness, knitting atramentous absolute as for a balmy pall” (16). It is a attenuate and able effect, not clumsy, as it ability accept been, because we are so assertive by Marlow’s applied and astute attitude.
When it comes to the appointment with Kurtz we are accordingly accessible to accord Marlow the account of the agnosticism as he reveals his own circuitous attitude to the man, and tries to explain what it is that Kurtz has apparent and felt. It is Kurtz’s celebrity that aboriginal interests him, actuality in this daydream abode of unreason. The alternative agents beam at his achievement that “Each base should be like a alarm on the alley appear bigger things, a centre for barter of course, but additionally for humanising” (47). At the aforementioned time Marlow cannot escape the anticipation that the aboriginal abstracts apparent on the coffer are not inhuman, “the anticipation of your alien alikeness with this agrarian and amorous uproar” (51) and we can see how he ability acquire how Kurtz’s own anatomy has been captured by the darkness.
He finds that he wants to allocution to Kurtz, alike admitting he realizes as anon as he gets to Kurtz’s base that “He had taken a aerial bench amid the devils of the land” (70), article Marlow knows will be about absurd for his admirers to understand; “How could you? – with solid pavement beneath your feet, amidst by affectionate neighbours...” (70). This is breadth Marlow’s adventure moves into the breadth of the absurd and the alone partly expressible Kurtz’s baronial writings end aback with the aboriginal cry “Exterminate all the brutes” (72). The “brother seaman” talks of how Kurtz has aggressive him – “I acquaint you...this man has continued my mind” (78). But Marlow can alone achieve “Why! He’s mad” (81) admitting the Russian’s protests.
The skulls are the affirmation of his absolute breakdown, that the black “had aside to him things about himself that he did no know” (83). The spell of the wilderness had alive “forgotten and barbarous instincts” (94) in him and abject his anatomy “beyond the bound of acceptable aspirations” (95). Marlow is able to see Kurtz’s adventure as a tragedy. His aim had been to “Live rightly, die, die” (99) but he had not accepted what was in himself, and Marlow’s address to angle by him at the end, alike to accomplishment him in a way, rests on an acquaintance that Kurtz was not despicable, and that he himself ability able-bodied acknowledge in the aforementioned way.
“He had fabricated that aftermost stride, he had stepped over the edge, while I had been acceptable to draw aback my afraid foot” (101). Aback in Europe, like Gulliver, he is disgusted by his adolescent man, “like the abandoned flauntings of absurdity in the face of a danger” (102), and he lies to Kurtz’s “intended” because neither she nor anyone abroad would be able to appreciate the truth.
Marlow does not affirmation to apperceive or acquire everything. It is the backward attributes of his anecdotal attitude that convinces us. The “real” narrator calls the accomplished affair “one of Marlow’s ambiguous experiences” (10). But no one could be all-seeing with such a subject; Marlow alone glimpses one of the abundant mysteries, and none of us is anytime accepted added than that. What Conrad has done is to accept a anecdotal adjustment and a blazon of narrator which conveys as able-bodied as accessible badly difficult things.
Conrad, Joseph. Heart of Darkness. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973.
Order a unique copy of this paper