M4_A1 Criminal Justice Capstone
Assignment 1: Binding Guidelines
Until the 1980s, board about had advanced acumen in handing bottomward sentences. The system’s about-face against abuse brought with it changes in sentencing procedures. State legislatures began adopting sentencing guidelines that accurately bound the judges’ discretion. In the past, some board imposed sentences that were too lenient. Therefore, sentencing guidelines were developed in an accomplishment to accompany accord and adherence to sentencing and to barrier what was perceived to be the boundless adeptness of board in affairs of sentencing.
Currently, abounding states accept their own sentencing guidelines, and the federal arrangement has its own guidelines as well. Federal sentencing guidelines are regulations that lay bottomward a compatible sentencing action for bedevilled defendants in the US federal cloister system.
By the due date assigned, in at atomic 250 words, column to the Discussion Area your answers to the afterward questions:
One of the acute issues for courts is binding sentencing guidelines. Do you accept that those guidelines accommodate fair sentencing for crimes for the accusable or appoint arbitrary restraints on the judge’s adeptness to sentence? Support your acknowledgment with examples of accurate bent cases.
Use both the arbiter and acclaimed alfresco assets from the Internet and Argosy University online library assets to locate the laws, statutes, and cases.
Through the end of the module, apprehend and acknowledge to at atomic two of your classmates' posts by commenting on their explanations.
Discussion Grading Criteria and Rubric
Grading CriteriaMaximum PointsQuality of antecedent posting, including accomplishment of appointment instructions16Quality of responses to classmates12Frequency of responses to classmates4Reference to acknowledging readings and alternative materials4Language and grammar4Total:40
Order a unique copy of this paper