Leonardo vs. Michelangelo
Michelangelo Violet Jane Greeley Art Appreciation. Da Vinci against Michelangelo Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simone aggregate abounding similarities. Both were painters, sculptors, and poets. They both had a addiction to leave their works incomplete. Both artists bound surpassed the talents of their advisers and accomplished acclaim with ease. In addition, both artists were accepted to accept advised analysis by analytic animal cadavers. Calm they accomplish up two-thirds of the Renaissance’s three greatest aesthetic minds of all times, the accession actuality Raphael. In this paper, I will aboriginal accord a abrupt adventures of anniversary artist, again analyze and adverse three works of art by Leonardo with three works of art by Michelangelo, followed by a altercation on how anniversary artisan fabricated their own claimed admission on the apple of art in Italy and Europe during the 16th century, and board acknowledging examples. Leonardo was built-in on April 15, 1452, and anesthetized abroad on May 1, 1519.
Leonardo’s aboriginal painting and the abstraction adviser was Andrea del Verrocchio, with whom he was apprenticed to and alike surpassed in skill. During his apprenticeship to Verrocchio, Leonardo excelled at abounding abilities including painting, sculpting, architecture, engineering, and mathematics. Still, further, he advised capacity such as botany, geology, geography, zoology, anatomy, hydraulics, and mechanics. Michelangelo was built-in on March 6, 1475, and anesthetized abroad on February 18, 1565. Back Michelangelo was fourteen years old, he was apprenticed to Domenico Ghirlandajo in April 1488. Afore long, Michelangelo excelled in his aesthetic ability, surpassed his adolescent apprentices, and at times alike rivaled his master’s abilities. Additionally, he accomplished admirable abilities in architecture, poetry, and engineering, but was best addicted of abstraction aloft all else.
Although Michelangelo wasn’t allegedly afflicted by Ghirlandajo in aesthetic methods or styles, his attitude and behavior reflected that of his adept added acutely by his accepted displays of active assignment belief and an abrupt temperament. While beneath the administration of Ghirlandajo, Michelangelo anxiously analyzed old and new artists and their techniques. These included but weren’t bound to Giotto, Masaccio, Donatello, Ghiberti, Benedetto da Majano, Mino da Fiesole, Antonio Rossellino, and Jacopo Della Quercia Rolland. Florentines whose admission can be credible in Michelangelo’s works are Giotto and Masaccio. A year afterwards his apprenticeship to Ghirlandajo, he was additionally alien to Bertoldo di Giovanni (who was himself already a apprentice of Donatello) through Lorenzo the Magnificent, and was instructed on the art of carve in the Garden of Medici as able-bodied as actuality afflicted by Lorenzo de Medici.
His aboriginal absorbed in abutting with Giovanni was to accretion acquaintance with the attitude of Donatello and to enhance his adeptness of antiquities, but the best adored asset Michelangelo acquired from Giovanni was admission to and the accord of the Medici family. From 1492 to 1494, Michelangelo acquired an amazing befalling to abstraction analysis in the hospital which was adjoined to San Spirito. Vasari fatigued the accent of belief aged forms and the acceptation of such in the assignment of all of the best awful admired adept artists in the Aerial Renaissance era. Leonardo, Raphael, and Michelangelo were no exceptions to this rule, and Michelangelo abnormally activated himself in that aspect. Leonardo was a aloft contributor to the art apple in the backward 15th and aboriginal 16th centuries and a antecedent of abounding accession aesthetic marvels including Raphael and Michelangelo. Here I will altercate St. Jerome in the Wilderness, The Aftermost Supper, and Mona Lisa. St. Jerome in the Wilderness was amorphous in 1480 and is one of abounding of Leonardo’s amateurish products.
St. Jerome resides in the Vatican Museums in Rome. St. Jerome withdrew from affiliation into the Syrian Desert and became a recluse. The painting illustrates a far off crucifix on the appropriate ancillary of the account and St. Jerome admiration bottomward all the while acclimation his eyes on the abroad crucifix. A bedrock can be credible in St. Jerome’s duke and a bobcat is abutting by. The bedrock represents the article with which St. Jerome uses to abuse himself for the purposes of atonement. The bobcat is apocalyptic of the accompaniment St. Jerome acquired afterwards healing an abrasion to the lion's paw. A cardinal’s hat calm with the bobcat and the bean are accepted ancestry associated with St. Jerome. Additionally on the appropriate is a abbey amid the rocks, the actuality of which could announce St. Jerome’s Doctoral position. Leonardo acclimated a fresh, new address in accession St. Jerome in a asymmetric way so that his amount was awfully altered than that of the lion. Through the access of time, this painting has endured breach and the activity of reassembly. The Aftermost Supper came into conception alpha in 1495, was bigger aloft in desultory periods, and was accomplished it in its absoluteness in 1498. Duke Ludovico Sforza and Duchess Beatrice d’Este commissioned The Aftermost Supper who capital it to be the centerpiece for the Sforza ancestors mausoleum. However, the painting now serves as the bank accoutrement for the dining anteroom in the abbey Santa Maria allowance Grazie.
The Aftermost Supper was an elaborately abundant representation of Jesus’ activity as it neared its end in the Gospel of John affiliate 13 ballad 21. Jesus appear his acquaintance of the accessible betrayal from aural his admired discipleship as the Bible declared the arena in the book of Matthew affiliate 26, ballad 21. The reactions of the aggregation ranged in capricious degrees of outrage, shock, horror, grief, and atheism as connected in the book of Matthew affiliate 26, ballad 22. Accession advertence to Biblical article included in the painting was the admission of the Eucharist in the book of Luke affiliate 22, verses 19 through 20. In the painting, Judas was acutely abashed at the advertisement of his plot. In a accompaniment of reservation, he was acquisitive the money purse absolute the argent which had been acquired in a barter for the betrayal. Some assemblage of the painting altercate that the purse could additionally be evocative of Judas’ cachet as broker of the accumulation as well.
Close assemblage may booty agenda of Judas angled over the alkali shaker, which may be a cleverly bearded advertence to a byword that signifies the betrayal of a master. Peter appeared to be abashed all the while wielding a knife; this could accept been a advised admittance of the painting in adjustment to accord assemblage a faculty of foreboding, a admonition of the abandon to appear in the bosom of Jesus actuality arrested. John was corrective in a address assuming him in the affliction of a admiration spell. As was frequently accomplished at the time, Leonardo positioned all of the aggregation and Jesus on one ancillary of the table for the purpose of actuality able to see them all. Some accession painters during afterwards periods of time occasionally afar Judas from the accession aggregation by either basement him on the opposing ancillary of the table or by apathy to accord him a halo-like the others in the painting, an accessible adumbration of his abatement from grace. Rather than cogent Judas in that way, Leonardo uses the caliginosity as a safe anchorage for the villain to burrow his own guilt.
Jesus could be credible in the painting as he acicular against the aliment and persisted in apprehension awaiting contest by advertence that the traitor would breach the aliment accompanying with himself as is appropriate in the book of Luke affiliate 22, ballad 21. Judas accomplished for the aliment as predicted because he was absent by the chat amid John and Peter. In this painting, the artisan acclimated a absolute adjustment of manipulating the lighting which in about-face artlessly brought the assemblage eyes to the axial focal point of the painting abaft Jesus’ head. Because Leonardo acclimated an accession adjustment of painting, The Aftermost Supper rapidly began deteriorating. Although efforts accept been fabricated to advance its integrity, the affection of the painting has suffered substantially. The abasement so compromised the painting can alone be speculated aloft that Leonardo originally advised for the accession of Jesus’ anxiety to be evocative of the accessible crucifixion. It’s absolutely credible in this art allotment that Leonardo did all-encompassing analysis with the advice of models and closes empiric abilities to actualize a psychologically annoying and visually adorable scene. Mona Lisa contrarily accepted as La Gioconda was a account conceived in about 1503 and was completed in 1519. The allotment was accomplished by the woman in the painting, Lisa del Gioconda, and her bedmate who was a affluent cottony merchant in Florence.
At the alpha of its existence, Mona Lisa may accept been housed at Chateau Fontainebleau, but was again relocated to the Palace of Versailles, again to the Louvre breadth it charcoal to this day. No accession assignment of art in the apple is added acclaimed than Mona Lisa. Lisa del Gioconda was a affiliate of the Gherardini family, who were arresting Florentines. The painting of this account was motivated by the accretion of the couple’s new abode as able-bodied as in anniversary of their additional son accepting been born. Factors that aided in the advance of this account accepting such colossal acclaim were the ambiguous facial expression, the aerial adjustment of painting the shapes, and the abomination of the composition. In creating the Mona Lisa, Leonardo acclimated a pyramid actualization as a base of calmly accession the accountable into amplitude permitted, with her easily bankrupt demurely demography the actualization of the antipode corner. The lighting of the account acclaim caressed her in assorted places including her breast, hands, neck, and face, giving the painting added axiological dimensions. Lisa captivated an arrect posture, and her anchored beam was accession audible affection that gave the account its signature quality. The darker elements of the painting such as Lisa’s beard and blind forth with the encompassing caliginosity advice to add brilliance to her face that adeptness contrarily accept been beneath noticeable. Leonardo’s absence of analogue authentic facial actualization added the activity of the subject. As was archetypal of Leonardo, the absolute landscape, the accepted calmness, affected use of lighting and shadows, and the abstruse analogue all contributed to this masterpiece.
It’s important to agenda the accomplishments independent a beheld apparition in that one ancillary was decidedly college than the accession which would be absurd in reality. However, because of the discrepancy, Lisa seemed to move or smile if the viewer's eyes confused from one ancillary to the other. The painting survived a basal of attacks over a aeon of time including theft, an acerbic spill, stone-throwing, and accession such mishaps, but has been minimally damaged and on break repaired. Michelangelo created abounding abundant works in his time, and in affiliation with Leonardo and Raphael authentic the aesthetic era of the Renaissance. I will focus on two of his statues; The Pieta and David, and one of his paintings; The Aftermost Judgment. Afore discussing Michelangelo’s statues, I’d like to recapitulate that he’d ahead acquired all-encompassing adeptness of animal analysis by secretly analytic cadavers, which aided his adeptness to actualize authentic portrayals of animal analysis while abstraction and painting.
Since this convenance was actionable as able-bodied as actuality advised about base behavior, accepting done so put him at an advantage over abounding accession artists. Assignment on the Pieta, a life-size bronze fabricated of marble was set into motion in amid 1498 and 1499 and accomplished its adeptness in 1500. It was the French cardinal, Jean de Bilheres Lagraulas who commissioned the Pieta to be done so that it adeptness enhance the actualization of the abbey in Saint Peters breadth he was advised to be buried. This statue, his aboriginal masterpiece was a representation of Mary captivation Jesus afterwards his crucifixion. Altercation amidst this assignment of art apropos Mary’s actualization of actuality adolescent than Jesus. However, the artisan was able to portray Mary’s adorableness as able-bodied as her affliction in an acutely active manner. The artist’s absorbed in assuming such adolescence in Mary was that he’d been attempting to use that affection as a adjustment of defining Mary’s purity. As a aftereffect of the active and agreeable actualization portrayed in the Pieta, Michelangelo’s bronze was different in allegory to accession artists portrayals of the aforementioned arena in which their Mary was abundant earlier and broken-hearted. Michelangelo created such abundant adumbration that the Pieta absolutely visibly displayed a array of textures including hair, fabric, and flesh. This authentic allotment of adeptness in accession to David has been replicated by abundant accession painters and sculptors. It’s been said that Michelangelo wasn’t initially in the addiction of signing any of his pieces of artistry. However, aloft audition assemblage crediting accession artists with his adeptness he began accomplishing so with the Pieta. The Pieta originally was destined to absorb Saint Peter’s Basilica in Vatican City, however, it is now amid in the abbey which took the abode of Saint Peter’s. Michelangelo’s David wasn’t the aboriginal bronze of the biblical hero, but it was the best absorbing one which has anytime been created appropriately far.
David was a accepted biblical affair about a adolescent attend boy purportedly the underdog who volunteered to access into activity with a abundant aloft adversary. In this story, David defeated his adversary with a slingshot, his skill, and his adventuresomeness as the alone weapons at hand, afterwards alike actuality adequate with armor. Aloft his acknowledgment to Florence in 1501, Michelangelo accustomed a balmy accession behindhand of his antecedent affiliation with the Medici family. He began abstraction David anon and completed this assignment in 1504. Donatello and Verrocchio both had ahead created statues of David; however, clashing Michelangelo, endemic were allegorical of the hero afterwards his activity with Goliath. Michelangelo created his accouterment of David to represent the contest above-mentioned to the activity with Goliath. He acclimated David’s analysis to bathe strength, anticipation, and aloof energy. He alike added the minute detail of engorged veins to afford a faculty of the concrete activity of an adrenaline blitz and the anima which accompanies it.
David’s facial announcement was apocalyptic of accepting already absitively to do battle, but not yet accepting completed the task. Acutely it was Michelangelo’s absorbed to portray David in the actual moment in which the ballista was about to be raised. Michelangelo’s David possesses a agitating affiliation with an ephemeral presence. It was clashing any accession because of its all-embracing admeasurement and attenuate physique, and to this day can be surpassed alone by Michelangelo’s Pieta. Aloft completion, this masterpiece added caked Michelangelo’s acceptability as a adept sculptor and artisan in all of Italy. David is now amid in Florence and stands at an absorbing fourteen anxiety high. Michelangelo’s adeptness of anatomy, balance, and admeasurement are prevalent, forth with an ambience of all-powerful magnificence. David is but one archetype of Michelangelo’s personality which exemplified all-powerful humanity. All-powerful altruism represented developing ethics in the Renaissance era.
The Renaissance began a movement abroad from centuries of ascendancy over animal diplomacy on the allotment of the abbey and a apology of humanistic ethics of the abreast world. It was durably captivated by Michelangelo that the animal anatomy was the active apotheosis of God’s all-powerful power. He auspiciously articulate man in its ultimately ballsy cachet in creating his David sculpture. The airy accurateness Michelangelo captivated to was in absolute adverse with the accurate access of Leonardo. Michelangelo began painting The Aftermost Judgment in 1536 and completed it in 1541. In the bosom of his work, the counter-reformation was in abounding force. An important affair affecting the apple of art was the aberration in religious behavior amid the Catholics and the Protestants. The Catholics admired artwork for its adeptness to dispense the bodies against piety. Protestants, on the accession hand, begin the artwork to advance account and distraction. To allay altercation apropos this issue, the Catholic Abbey accomplished an acceding that images should be visually and theologically unambiguous. The uproar of the counter-reformation was active in Michelangelo’s accommodation to acrylic the altarpiece of the Sistine Chapel, The Aftermost Judgment as a way of depicting the arguable times. The axial amount of the altarpiece was the Lord, and all about the Christ amount were nudes. God was the adamant ascendancy over his animal capacity and physically gestured his absorbed to absolutely abate humanity.
It’s absolutely bright that the Lord had complete ascendancy over the afterlife of all of the alcohol about him. The Heavenly hosts emanated their unease, while angels trumpeted, and the Lord discerned amid the aloof who ascended to Heaven and the accursed who were befuddled into the pits of Hell. Michelangelo added purveyed abhorrence by including ascent asleep abstracts and demons afflictive abundant adversity and affliction aloft the accursed souls. Accession accepted abstracts which accompaniment this masterpiece were Saint Bartholomew and who was either the acceptable bandit or St. Andrew. The works of da Vinci and Buonarroti decidedly afflicted the apple of art in the 16th aeon in Italy and Europe in abundant ways. The two artists aggregate abounding similarities in aptitude and ambit of knowledge; however, it was their alone character that abstract their works to the cachet of masterpieces in their lifetimes and beyond. In 1476, Leonardo was acceptable to acrylic an angel in Verrocchio’s Baptism of Christ, in which he afflicted his adept with his superb affectation of talent. By that point in time, he’d already been adopted to be a painter into the painter’s guild.
Other aeon alongside Leonardo beneath Verrocchio’s administration included such notable artists as Perugino and Lorenzo di Credi. By the year 1481, Leonardo’s aptitude was accepted all over Italy, and he was commissioned by the Saint Donato abbey to acrylic their altarpiece which is now accepted as The Adoration of the Kings. About as was Leonardo’s tendency, he alone to complete the altarpiece and approved application with Ludovico Sforza, Duke of Milan. His aboriginal assignment for the Duke was to actualize a bronze of Ludovico’s father. About in 1496, Leonardo began planning and painting his acclaimed Aftermost Supper amid in the Santa Maria Delle Grazie, which took about two years to complete. About the year 1500, he created the painting accepted as The Activity of Anghiari, and anon afterwards boarded on his best acclaimed work, Mona Lisa. Francois, I was amid the aboriginal assemblage to foolishly abutment the advancing of the Renaissance to France and commissioned Leonardo to assignment about the year 1516 forth with accession arresting abstracts such as Rosso Fiorentino.
Following this event, he again created two added paintings for the French agent in Milan, The Virgin of the Rocks, and Saint Anne with the Virgin and the Infant Christ that concluded up actuality his aftermost masterpieces. Almost two centuries later, accession artisan accepted as Diego Velazquez would use agnate painting techniques to Leonardo in which he wasn’t as anxious with every minute detail of a accountable actuality so abundant as capturing their appropriate impressions. Leonardo was additionally the administrator of a accessory accepted as sfumato which was acclimated by abounding accession artists who followed him alike centuries afterwards in adjustment to affected the botheration of accuracy and angle creating a adamant and board actualization on the capacity of the paintings. Unfortunately, accession botheration arose which this address could not accommodate. The caliginosity acclimated by Leonardo didn’t artlessly activity in the ablaze of day, accordingly Impressionist artists had to resort to abashing some aspects of their painting to abound over the dilemma. Michelangelo abstruse the adorn address from his aboriginal instructor, Ghirlandaio. Afterwards on, he was beatific to the Medici Garden breadth he abstruse from Bertoldo di Giovanni. While in the attendance of the Medici family, Lorenzo de Medici encouraged Michelangelo to absorb himself in conversations with abounding of the best acclaimed men of the time. He accomplished acceptance for his aptitude in about 1492 back he complete his aboriginal masterpiece The Activity of the Centaurs, which was a marble relief.
This bronze charcoal amateurish as are abounding of Michelangelo’s works of art. By 1499, Michelangelo succeeded in creating a superb bronze accepted as Pieta, which was completed in 1499 and acquired him to accretion accepted recognition. In the abutting few years, he active his time by creating a bronze of David, in the Accademia, Florence. Michelangelo’s delineation of David askew those of Donatello and Verrocchio's inability, and talent. His abutting project, the tomb of Pope Julius II was to be the longest abiding one of his life, demography a abounding forty years to complete. One bronze included in this abundant endeavor is Moses, arguably the best accomplished assignment apparent by this authentic sculptor. The tomb additionally includes The Atlas Slave (incomplete), The Dying Slave, and a bronze of Lorenzo de Medici, forth with two acknowledging nudes below. In the bosom of his assignment on the tomb of Pope Julius II, he formed on the Sistine Abbey beam from May 10, 1508, until October 31, 1512, this additionally actuality done for Julius II. This authentic masterpiece is to this day incomparable to any accession assignment of art.
Pope Julius II chose to apply Michelangelo for this assignment because his acceptability throughout Italy and Europe was that of an outstanding sculptor who had an aberrant aptitude for application concrete forms to accurate his own animosity and emotions. The beam of the Sistine Abbey in its absoluteness contains nine aloft panels; God Separating Ablaze from Darkness, The Conception of the Sun, Moon, and Stars, The Breach of Land from Water, The Conception of Adam, The Conception of Eve, The Temptation and Abatement of Adam, The Sacrifice of Noah, The Flood, and the Drunkenness of Noah. Twenty-four years later, Michelangelo was commissioned by Pope Paul III to acrylic a mural aloft the chantry of the Sistine Abbey which was to be a accompaniment allotment to the ceiling; The Aftermost Judgment. This altarpiece took him six years to complete alpha in the summer of 1536 and extensive its achievement on October 31, 1541. According to records, Michelangelo active a distinct abettor for this project; Urbino, a accomplished artisan who showed a cogent adeptness with the foreshortening technique. Abundant authorities on the amount accept Michelangelo’s antecedent of afflatus for The Aftermost Judgment was acquired from a poem, The All-powerful Comedy was accounting by Dante who mentioned a Charon and Minossis both of whom are included in the painting. Abundant acclaim and criticism were heard for this painting, alignment from admiration and admiration to abhorrence for the atrocious nudity. Biagio da Cesena was one of the aboriginal amid abounding who offered belittling disapproval of the dishabille of the figures.
As a result, Michelangelo corrective the face of Biago on the amount of Satan and a serpent slithering about the anatomy while bitter the beam breadth of Satan. Despite Biago’s complaints to the Pope, the painting remained as it was. Unfortunately, due to so abundant criticism over the dishabille of the painting, modifications were afterwards fabricated by Daniele da Volterra, who was assassin by the abbey admiral to acrylic accouterment on the genitals of the nude figures. However, accession artist, Martino Rota fabricated an engraved replica of the aboriginal Aftermost Judgment above-mentioned to the alterations. Agnate to the habits of Leonardo, Michelangelo frequently deserted his paintings afore commutual them, and the alone accepted accomplished board painting is The Holy Family. Michelangelo’s acceptability was far above to those of his aeon in sculpture, alike including the abutting generation. Abounding new and accessible artists advised Michelangelo’s methods with abundant acuteness and strived to imitate his akin of acumen by painting nudes in their own works of art as he had done. These artists seemed to accept overindulged themselves in this practice, and such behavior took abroad from the acceptation of the paintings rather than abacus to it. This appearance became accepted as Mannerism. In closing, I’ve mentioned a few similarities accepted amid both Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simone. In addition, I gave a arbitrary of anniversary artist's lives, compared a few of their art pieces, and accomplished off with a altercation on how anniversary artisan fabricated their own claimed admission on the apple of art in Italy and Europe during the 16th aeon with acknowledging examples.
Bambach, C. (2002, October). Analysis in the Renaissance. Retrieved from Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History: http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/anat/hd_anat.htm Classics, D. (2012).
Masters of Art: Leonardo da Vinci. Delphi Classics. Gombrich, E. H. (1995).
The Adventure of Art. Hong Kong: Phaidon Press Limited. Hartt, F. (1989).
Art: A History of Painting, Sculpture, Architectonics 3rd edition. New York: Harry N. Abrams. Helicon, P. (2005)
. The Hutchinson Encyclopedia of the Renaissance. Abingdon, Oxfordshire, GBR: Helicon Publishing. Retrieved Nov 4, 2012, from http://site.brary.com/lib/ashford/docDetail. activity Jacobs, D. (1968).
Master Painters of the Renaissance. New York: The Viking Press, Inc. Johnson, P. (2000).
The Renaissance: A Short History. New York: Random House Inc. Kleiner, F. S. (2010).
Gardner's Art Through the Ages: The Western Perspective. United States: Clark Baxter. Lee, S. (2004, Sep 2).
Turning 500: The Acceptation of Michelangelo's 'David': Final Edition. Retrieved from Proquest: http://search. proquest.com/docview/357580072? accountid=32521 Nickerson, A. (2008).
Journey into Michelangelo's Rome. Birkley, California, United States: Roaring Forties Press. Retrieved Nov 4, 2012, http://site.ebrary.com/lib/ashford/docDetail.action? docID=10289907;p00=paintings%20michelangelo Rebman, R. C. (2000).
The Sistine Chapel. San Diego, California: Lucent Books, Inc. Rolland, R. (1921).
Michelangelo. New York: Duffield and Company. Vasari, G. (2006, Feb). Lives of the Best Accomplished Painters, Sculptors, and Architects. Retrieved from ebrary.com: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/ashford/docDetail. action? docID=10124952;p00=lives%20excellent%20painters%2C%20sculptors%2C%20architects
Order a unique copy of this paper