Katherine Becks

   Week 1 Assignment Rubric:  Use the Rubric to adviser your writing.     Tasks Level 1: Does not accommodated the minimum criteria Level 2: Approaches minimum criteria Level 3: Meets minimum criteria Level   4: Meets ambition criteria   Part 1: Candidate analyzes administration   approaches (i.e., servant, transactional, transformational) and draws   comparisons and contrasts amid them. (W1LO1) (CLO1) Candidate lists the   three administration approaches. (K) Candidate lists the   three administration approaches with little description. (K) Candidate describes the   three administration approaches briefly, and may abridgement clarity. (K) Candidate describes the   three administration approaches assiduously and with clarity. (K)   Candidate provides   vague or abridged statements apropos similarities and differences of the   three administration approaches. (K) Candidate identifies similarities   and differences of the three administration approaches with little or no   analysis. (K) Candidate provides   minimal assay of the three administration approaches with accepted advice   of similarities and differences. (K) Candidate provides in   depth assay of the three administration approaches with specificity of   similarities and differences. (K)   Candidate articulates little   or no acknowledging affirmation from the readings and lectures, and assay is not   evident. (S) Candidate articulates little   supporting affirmation from the readings and lectures, and may abridgement accuracy   and/or specificity in analysis. (S) Candidate articulates accepted   supporting affirmation from the readings and lectures, and may abridgement accuracy   and/or specificity in analysis. (S) Candidate articulates   comprehensive affirmation from the readings and lectures to abutment assay   with specificity and clarity. (S)   Part 2: Candidate explains anniversary   Personal Administration Lever and reflects on the akin of accomplishment he/she   utilizes anniversary Lever in several capacities. (W1LO2) (CLO1) Candidate lists   Personal Administration Levers with no account and/or the account may be   incomplete. (K) Candidate lists anniversary of   the 5 Claimed Administration Levers with little explanation. (K) Candidate explains anniversary   of the 5 Claimed Administration Levers with accepted understanding. (K) Candidate explains anniversary   of the 5 Claimed Administration Levers with depth, specificity, and clarity. (K)   Candidate demonstrates   little or no self-reflection apropos claimed values, beliefs, and   attitudes accompanying to anniversary of the Claimed Administration Levers, and advertence to   the Levers is incomplete. (M) Candidate demonstrates   superficial self-reflection apropos claimed values, beliefs, and attitudes   related to anniversary of the Claimed Administration Levers, and is defective in   specificity and clarity. (M) Candidate demonstrates   an arising abyss of self-reflection apropos claimed values, beliefs, and   attitudes accompanying to anniversary of the Claimed Administration Levers, and may be   lacking in specificity and clarity. (M) Candidate articulates   depth of self-reflection apropos claimed values, beliefs, and attitudes   related to anniversary of the Claimed Administration Levers with specificity and   clarity. (M)   Candidate demonstrates   little or no self-reflection apropos how he/she approaches his/her assignment accompanying   to anniversary of the Claimed Administration Levers, and advertence to the Levers is   incomplete. (M) Candidate demonstrates   superficial self-reflection apropos how he/she approaches his/her assignment accompanying   to anniversary of the Claimed Administration Levers, and is defective in specificity and   clarity. (M) Candidate demonstrates   an arising abyss of self-reflection apropos how he/she approaches his/her   work accompanying to anniversary of the Claimed Administration Levers, and may be defective in   specificity and clarity. (M) Candidate articulates   depth of self-reflection apropos how he/she approaches his/her assignment accompanying   to anniversary of the Claimed Administration Levers with specificity and clarity. (M)   Candidate demonstrates   little or no self-reflection apropos alternation amid staff, students,   and families accompanying to anniversary of the Claimed Administration Levers, and advertence   to the Levers is incomplete. (M) Candidate demonstrates   superficial self-reflection apropos alternation amid staff, students,   and families accompanying to anniversary of the Claimed Administration Levers, and is   lacking in specificity and clarity. (M) Candidate demonstrates   an arising abyss of self-reflection apropos alternation amid staff,   students, and families accompanying to anniversary of the Claimed Administration Levers, and   may be defective in specificity and clarity. (M) Candidate articulates   depth of self-reflection apropos alternation amid staff, students, and   families accompanying to anniversary of the Claimed Administration Levers with specificity   and clarity. (M)   Candidate articulates little   or no acknowledging affirmation from the readings and lectures, and assay is not   evident. (S) Candidate articulates little   supporting affirmation from the readings and lectures, and may abridgement accuracy   and/or specificity in analysis. (S) Candidate articulates accepted   supporting affirmation from the readings and lectures, and may abridgement accuracy   and/or specificity in analysis. (S) Candidate articulates   comprehensive affirmation from the readings and lectures to abutment assay   with specificity and clarity. (S) Part 1: Administration Approaches – Allusive Essay  (W1LO1) (CLO1) Directions: Submit a 3 – 5 paragraph/500-word minimum comparative, analytic essay. Compare and adverse servant, transactional, and transformational administration approaches. Use the Basic Autograph Elements archetypal provided in the advance Resources, and accommodate affirmation from the readings and lectures to abutment your analysis. Consider the following: Þ What specific differences did you acquisition in these approaches? Þ What specific similarities did you acquisition in these approaches? Þ What accurately did you apprehend and apprentice from the lectures that abreast your assay of these approaches? Use 12 pt. atramentous font: Times New Roman. The argument box will aggrandize to fit the narrative.     Part 2: Claimed Administration Levers – Cogitating Essay (W1LO2) (CLO1) Directions: Submit a cogitating article of 500 words (minimum) application the bristles claimed administration levers from the readings and address to reflect on the following: Þ Your values, beliefs, and attitudes Þ The way you collaborate with staff, students, families  Þ How you access your work Use the Basic Autograph Elements archetypal provided in the advance Resources and accommodate specific evidence/references to the readings and lectures in your reflection. Use 12 pt. atramentous font: Times New Roman. The argument box will aggrandize to fit the narrative.   

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal
Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp

Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code COURSEGUY