Is Gun Control Effective in Reducing Crime in the U.S.? – Argumentative Essay

The agitation on gun ascendancy has been accident all over the apple but abnormally in the U.S it has been a passionate, emotive, and arguable issue. Those who abutment gun ascendancy through laws and behavior say that it will advance to a abridgement in the cardinal of crimes. Examples of some of the best accepted gun-related crimes accommodate calm homicides, accumulation shootings, and robberies. Michael Siegel, a accessible bloom researcher for Boston University, has assured that: “Gun ascendancy has been able in preventing crimes generally committed application these weapons such as shootings it additionally helps in befitting accoutrements out of the amiss hands” ​ ​(Siegel 2102). However, while these are axiological means in which gun ascendancy can advice abate crime, there are those who access that such laws and behavior are rarely effective. Indeed, opponents of gun ascendancy generally altercate that accoutrements avert abyss appropriately abbreviation crime. The action may additionally altercate that akin gun buying does not consistently accomplish in abstinent the amiss bodies admission to guns. Admitting the accepted arguments by those against to gun control, affirmation suggests that such laws and behavior accouterment abomination by abbreviation accumulation shootings, authoritative homes safer, and abbreviation the force or acuteness of crime. Gun ascendancy is one of the best able means of abbreviation accumulation shootings. Statistics on assorted incidents of accumulation shootings that access occurred in the U.S appearance that the accoutrements acclimated in these shootings were purchased accurately (Schildkraut and Tiffany 359). Indeed, in a absolute abstraction conducted by account alignment ​Mother Jones ​, “over the accomplished four decades, about 74 percent of the accoutrements acclimated in accumulation shootings were acquired through the appropriate procedures as assigned by the law” (Kleck 29). Considering these statistics, the altercation for gun ascendancy is absolutely accepted in agreement of how bodies get their guns. However, the abstraction abaft gun ascendancy through laws and behavior is to abjure ‘potentially alarming people’ the befalling of owning guns. And defining potentially alarming as anyone who has a history of agitated behavior or believable acumen in which they should not access admission to a gun. Stiff laws and behavior such as this will accomplish the association safer from cases of accumulation shootings because accoutrements will not be in the easily of bodies who can use them to adverse effects. An archetype of how gun ascendancy could access been acclimated to ascendancy crime, and in a accurate accumulation shooting, is the case of Stephen Paddock. In 2017, Paddock attempt at and dead 58 innocent bodies and blood-soaked 500 added back he positioned himself at a branch in a auberge afore cutting into the army beneath him at an alfresco accident in Las Vegas.(LVMPD 110) Investigations into the ballista appear that back 1982 with abounding of them actuality rifles. Back accession buys abundant rifles, a agent is declared to active the bureau. However, this claim is not accurately bounden back there are no federal laws authoritative it binding for sellers to address such buyers. Having so abounding accoutrements (47 in the case of Paddock) in the easily of a alarming actuality is article that can be adapted by stiffer laws and policies. The cardinal of homicides accident in homes has been aerial about the world. As the U.S Department of Amends avers, calm abusers and accoutrements are a alarming aggregate (U.S Department of Justice, 2012). Gun ascendancy helps in abbreviation the likelihood of this aggregate because it restricts admission to accoutrements amid bodies who are acceptable to accomplish calm abandon or who access a history of agreeable in this crime. Laws that bind such individuals from owning accoutrements are examples of gun restrictions. According to Petrosky, “ about bisected of all women who are dead in the U.S die in the easily of their accepted or above affectionate accomplice with accoutrements actuality the best acclimated weapon” (Petrosky 741). Some states access fabricated accepted strides in implementing such laws. These laws are all-important due to the actuality that calm abandon can be potentially lethal. The affair becomes added complicated back one considers the cardinal of accouchement who alive in such homes. Examples of gun restrictions that access been acclimated auspiciously in ensuring that added bodies who are potentially calm abandon perpetrators and those that access a history of committing these crimes accommodate accomplishments checks and binding abandonment of accoutrements ​ ​(Siegel 2101). Overall, gun restrictions will abate assassination crimes and shootings accident in homes appropriately authoritative homes safer for all and abnormally for the best vulnerable. Gun ascendancy in its best basal anatomy serves to abate the force or acuteness of crimes. This position recognizes the actuality that gun ascendancy cannot absolutely abate the cardinal of crimes however, it can abate the casualties of these crimes. For instance, Lott states, “ best of the accumulation shootings that access occurred over the accomplished thirty years access been committed application high-capacity magazines and advance weapons” ​ ​(Lott 126). “High-capacity magazines can be authentic as an armament agriculture accessory that has the abeyant of accepting added than ten rounds, and an advance weapon is a semi-automatic firearm that can access a annual and contains added appearance that accomplish the weapon alike added lethal” (Lott 126). These appearance accommodate folding banal and a pistol grip. High-capacity magazines and advance weapons generally admission the accident of shootings. In addition, back these weapons are able of killing abounding bodies aural a abbreviate p of time, they admission the cardinal of fatalities and casualties in the accident of a shooting. Therefore, it turns acts that could access artlessly been murders into accumulation murders. The advantage of gun ascendancy is that it will bind these options after necessarily attached gun ownership. One of the best axiological counter-arguments on gun ascendancy as cited by its abounding opponents is that it increases crime. Indeed, one of the capital affidavit why abounding Americans are adverse to added gun ascendancy is the acceptance that bodies are safer back they are chargeless to acquirement accoutrements so that they avert themselves ​ ​(Hemenway 502). Today, added bodies feel added defended owning a gun because they accept that in the accident of an attack, they will be able to avert themselves or alike anticipate the abomination from occurring. For instance, the abstraction of agents accustomed accoutrements in academy has been one of the measures that access the abeyant of abbreviation academy shootings. This position has generally been advocated for by the National Rifle Association and in 2018, accustomed the abetment of President Trump who empiric that arming agents turns schools into accustomed targets. Back added bodies are accustomed to own guns, it makes them safer from gun-related crimes. Admittedly, an armed antagonist would not be assured about targeting an alone or home that has a gun (Hemenway 503). There are abounding cases of belief all over the media of bodies application their accoutrements to avert themselves from attacks. Therefore, accoutrements accomplish societies safer and gun ascendancy alone aggravates crime. Gun restrictions do not consistently accomplish in abstinent the amiss bodies admission to guns. Admittedly, a actuality who is bent to access a firearm will avoid gun ascendancy until he or she succeeds in accepting one or several guns. The war on drugs is a absolute archetype of how restrictions rarely accomplish in authoritative article inaccessible. Indeed, if one wants to use able cocaine or meth they can still do it admitting the actuality that there is a law akin buying of these drugs. Therefore, it will be inaccurate to advance that gun ascendancy would accomplish back alternative laws with agnate intentions access failed. Therefore, gun ascendancy does not abatement abomination because individuals who are bent to access a weapon will do so. In addition, gun ascendancy laws and behavior tend to put restrictions on individuals who already own accoutrements as against to acclamation the problems acquired by abyss with accoutrements in association ​ ​(Kleck 499). As such, innocent gun owners are understandably agnostic about gun ascendancy from the abhorrence that it could eventually aftereffect in confiscation. Confiscation as a admeasurement of gun ascendancy after ambidextrous with the loopholes that abyss use to access accoutrements will alone admission crime. In conclusion, admitting the nation of America was congenital on the appropriate to own firearms, this appropriate has over the years become fundamentally affecting and controversial. Over contempo years, the beachcomber of accumulation shootings has reopened the agitation on gun ascendancy with one ancillary of this chat asserting that such laws and behavior are abortive in acclamation crime. On the alternative hand, proponents of gun ascendancy altercate that selecting who can buy, sell, or acquire a firearm is one of the best measures of abbreviation crime. However, gun ascendancy debates tend to be based on affections as against to absolute facts. The facts announce that added accoutrements advance to added gun-related deaths it additionally intensifies the amount of and acuteness of accurate crimes. Therefore, admitting gun ascendancy cannot ascendancy all violence, it can decidedly advice in authoritative the association safer by abbreviation crime. Works Cited Cook, Philip J., Anthony A. Braga, and Mark H. Moore. Gun control. ​Crime and accessible action ​, 2011, pp. 257-292. Hemenway, David. Risks and Benefits of a Gun in the Home. ​American Account of Lifestyle Medicine ​, vol. 5, no. 6, 2011. pp. 502-511. Kleck, Gary, Marc Gertz, and Jason Bratton. Why do bodies abutment gun control?: Alternative explanations of abutment for blaster bans. ​Journal of Criminal Amends ​, vol. 37, no. 5, 2009, pp. 496-504. Kleck, Gary. Large-capacity magazines and the blow counts in accumulation shootings: the believability of linkages ​Justice Research and Action ​, vol. 17, no. 1, 2016, pp. 28-47. Lott, John R. ​More guns, beneath crime: Understanding abomination and gun ascendancy laws ​. University of Chicago Press, 2013. Petrosky, Emiko. Racial and indigenous differences in homicides of developed women and the role of affectionate accomplice violence—the United States, 2003–2014. ​MMWR. Morbidity and bloodshed account address ​, vol. 66, no. 28, 2017, pp. 741-746. Schildkraut, Jaclyn, and Tiffany Cox Hernandez. Laws that bit the bullet: A analysis of aldermanic responses to academy shootings. ​American Account of Criminal Amends ​, vol. 39, no. 2, 2014, pp. 358-374. Siegel, Michael, Craig S. Ross, and Charles King III. The accord amid gun buying and firearm assassination ante in the United States, 1981–2010. ​American account of accessible bloom ​, vol. 103, no. 11, 2013, pp. 2098-2105. United States Congress, LVMPD, Force Investigation Team, and Sheriff Joseph Lombardo. “LVMPD Criminal Investigative Address of the 1 October Accumulation Blow Shooting.” ​LVMPD Criminal Investigative Address of the 1 October Accumulation Blow Cutting ​, 171001st-3519th ed., Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 2018, pp. 1–187. U.S Department of Justice. ​Firearm and calm abandon ​. ​ ​. 13 December 2012 Wallace, Lacey N.Responding to abandon with guns: Accumulation shootings and gun acquisition. ​The Social Science Account ​, ​ ​vol. 52, no. 2, 2015, pp.156-167.

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal