# HLT 362V Week 5 Assignment; Workbook Exercise 23, Exercise 24

HLT 362V Applied Statistics for Health Care Professionals - Grand Canyon

HLT 362V EXERCISE 23

1. What is the r amount for the accord amid Hamstring backbone basis 60Â°/s and the Shuttle run test? Is this r amount significant? Accommodate a account for your answer.

2. Consider r = 1.00 and r = -1.00. Which r amount is stronger? Accommodate a account for your answer.

3. Call the administration of the accord amid the Hamstring backbone basis 60Â°/s and the Shuttle run test.

4. Without application numbers, call the accord amid the Hamstring backbone basis 120Â°/s and the Triple hop index.

5. Which capricious has the weakest accord with the Quadriceps backbone basis 120Â°/s? Accommodate a account for your answer.

6. Which of the afterward sets of variables has the arch relationship?

a. Hamstring backbone basis 120Â°/s and the Hop index

b. Quadriceps backbone basis 60Â°/s and the Carioca test

c. Quadriceps backbone basis 120Â°/s and the Side footfall test

d. Quadriceps backbone basis 60Â°/s and the Triple hop index

7. In Table 5, two r ethics are appear as r = -0.498 and r = -0.528. Call anniversary r amount in words, advertence which would be added statistically significant, and accommodate a account for your answer.

8. The advisers declared that the abstraction showed a positive, cogent alternation amid Quadriceps backbone indices and pre- and postoperative anatomic stability. Considering the abstracts presented in the Table 5, do you accede with their statement? Accommodate a account for your answer.

9. The advisers declared that no cogent accord could be declared amid Hamstring backbone indices 60Â°/s and anatomic stability. Given the abstracts in Table 5, explain why not.

10. Consider the accord appear for the Quadriceps backbone basis 120Â°/s and the Hop basis (r = 0.744**, p = 0.000 ). What do these r and p ethics announce accompanying to statistical acceptation and analytic importance?

HLT 362V EXERCISE 24

1. What is the r amount listed for the accord amid variables 4 and 9?

2. Call the alternation r = -0.32** application words. Is this a statistically cogent correlation? Accommodate a account for your answer.

3. Calculate the allotment of about-face explained for r = 0.53. Is this alternation clinically important? Accommodate a account for your answer.

4. According to Table 2, r = 0.15 is listed as the alternation amid which two items? Call this relationship. What is the aftereffect admeasurement for this relationship, and what admeasurement sample would be bare to ascertain this accord in approaching studies?

5. Calculate the allotment of about-face explained for r = 0.15. Call the analytic accent of this relationship.

6. Which two variables in Table 2, accept the weakest correlation, or r value? Which accord is the abutting to this r value? Accommodate a account for your answer.

7. Is the alternation amid LOT-R Total array and Avoidance-Distraction arresting appearance statistically significant? Is this accord accordant to practice? Accommodate rationales for your answers.

8. Is the alternation amid variables 9 and 4 significant? Is this alternation accordant to practice? Accommodate a account for your answer.

9. Consider two values, r = 0.08 and r = -0.58. Call them in accord to anniversary other. Call the analytic accent of both r values.

10. Appraise the Pearson r ethics for LOT-R Total, which abstinent Optimism with the Task and Emotion Arresting Styles. What do these after-effects indicate? How ability you use this advice in your practice?

BONUS Question/Solution

One of the abstraction goals was to appraise the accord amid optimism and psychopathology. Application the abstracts in Table 2, codify an assessment apropos the all-embracing alternation amid optimism and psychopathology. Accommodate a account for your answer.

0

## Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
\$26