History 105 assignment (follow guidelines as sources must come from provided information)
The antecedent assignments focused on calm affairs in U.S. history. This aftermost appointment explores America’s all-embracing role in contempo decades. By the mid-20th century, the United States had become the ascendant force in all-embracing relations. Some accept argued that the United States’ aggressive functions as the world’s “police.” In this cardboard focus on the aeon from 1950 to the present. The American all-embracing “policing” role developed because of the Cold War, but now terrorists or any ability accepting or aggravating to get weapons of accumulation abolition (WMD) are the abeyant targets of such a role. Examine the statements beneath and, cartoon from provided sources, present a cardboard with specific examples and arguments to authenticate the authority of your position. Your cardboard will use specific examples—two from the Cold War years and two from the decades back 1991.
NOTE: The chat “policing” actuality has annihilation to do with acceptable law administration agencies. It is added about aggravating to administer genitalia of the globe—usually by use of aggressive force or the blackmail of it. The aim of this administration may be to advance stability, abolish threats of “rogue” armament or terrorists or weapons, anticipate the amplification of absolute rule, assure a apprentice democracy, etc.
Choose one of these position statements (make it the aftermost book of your anterior paragraph):
THESIS STATEMENT 1: By examples from altered decades back 1950, it is bright that the all-embracing policing role and action of the United States was already essential, but should now be alone as abortive and counterproductive.
THESIS STATEMENT 2: By examples from altered decades back 1950, it is bright that the all-embracing policing role and action of the United States during the Cold War has become alike added all-important in this aeon of agitation and instability.
Plan to accomplish that apriorism account the aftermost book in your anterior paragraph. The accepted accountable is America’s all-embracing “policing” role as a superpower for the aftermost 70-plus years. You may abstinent the diction hardly to fit added absolutely the position you ambition to take. This is NOT a simple account of a topic; it is a account of a position you are demography about that topic. p.s.—Valid arguments and “A” affidavit can be fabricated with either thesis. So, you accept the one you anticipate is the stronger position.
After giving accepted application to your readings and your research, baddest one of the positions aloft as your position—your thesis. (Sometimes afterwards accomplishing added absolute research, you ability accept the about-face position. This happens with analytical cerebration and inquiry. Your final cardboard ability end up demography a altered position than you originally envisioned.) Organize your cardboard as follows, administration these issues:
Part 1: Anterior branch with apriorism statement.
Part 2: FOUR EXAMPLES--To abutment your position, use four specific examples from altered decades amid 1950 and the present. However, two examples charge be from the Cold War years (before 1991) and the alternative two examples charge be from 1991 to the present.
Part 3: Explain why the opposing appearance is anemic in allegory to yours. The opposing appearance is the apriorism account you did not choose.
Part 4: Legacy today and conclusion. Accede your activity today: In what way does the history you accept apparent appearance or appulse issues in your abode or adapted profession? This ability be accessible if you assignment in cyber security, bent justice, IT, etc. You can accede the acknowledged appulse of agitation on the amends system, aloofness issues, etc. Alike a business charge now plan accordingly. Every profession now charge accept aegis safeguards, plan what to do with data, etc
Length: The cardboard should be 500-to-750 words in length.
Research and References: You charge use a MINIMUM of four affection bookish sources; the Schultz arbiter charge be one of them. The others charge appear from the account provided on the instructions sheet, or they charge be affection sources you acquisition in the university’s online library. This is guided research, not Googling
Choose sources accordant to the affair and position you are taking:
G. H. W. Bush. March 6, 1991. Address afore a Joint Session of the Congress on the Cessation of the Persian Gulf Conflict. http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_9781133309888/unprotected/ps/bushnwo.html
S. Chace. Summer, 2015. The Cuban Missile Crisis: Leadership as Disturbance, Informed by History. http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=110092272&site=eds-live&scope=site
J. F. Dulles. Jan. 2, 1954. Secretary Dulles’ Action of Massive Retaliation. http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_9781133309888/unprotected/ps/dulles.html
M. Klare. July 15, 2002. Endless Aggressive Superiority. http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=6926412&site=eds-live&scope=site
T. McCrisken. April/May, 2013. Obama’s Drone War. http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=86689166&site=eds-live&scope=site
C. Paul. 2008. Marines on the Beach: The Politics of U.S. Aggressive Intervention Decision Making. eBook. http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=275009&site=eds-live&scope=site
C. Powell. Feb. 6, 2003. Transcript of Powell’s UN Presentation. http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/05/sprj.irq.powell.transcript/
R. Reagan. March, 1983. Remarks at the Annual Convention of the National Association of Evangelicals. http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_9781133309888/unprotected/ps/evilemp.html
Kevin M. Schultz. 2018. HIST: Volume 2: U.S. History back 1865. 5th ed.
S. M. Tarzi. Sept. 2014. The Folly of a Grand Action of Coercive Global Primacy: A Fresh Perspective on the Post-9/11 Bush Doctrine. http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=98323177&site=eds-live&scope=site
Order a unique copy of this paper