Freud’s Interpretation of Sophicles’ Oedipus Tyrannus Is Ridiculous
"Freud's estimation of Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus is ridiculous. " Altercate This article will altercate the estimation of Oedipus Tyrannus by Freud and whether his estimation holds any weight in application it to aid his own theory, the Oedipus complex, or whether it was a antic account of the comedy itself. Freud’s approach will be explored first, afore affective on to attending at the estimation itself. This will accord a able faculty of how the Oedipus circuitous comes about in a adolescent adolescent and advice in the altercation as to whether Oedipus may accept been accomplishing this benumbed desire.
The altercation will additionally blow aloft Freud’s acceptance that it is his own approach that explains the acumen for the play’s abiding success. Sigmund Freud is the ancestor of a annex of attitude that he called psychoanalysis, as able-bodied as accepting a amazing access in how avant-garde attitude has developed back the about-face of the 20th Century. Freud was built-in on May 6th 1856. The aboriginal advertence to Freud accepting acclimated Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus to advice strengthen his approach of the Oedipus complex, which is explained below, and additionally the aboriginal acknowledgment of the Oedipus circuitous altogether comes in 1900 in Freud’s The Estimation of Dreams.
However, in The Estimation of Dreams the approach is acutely abandoned aloof alpha to be devised by Freud as it is not until 1910 that the appellation ‘Oedipus compex’ is aboriginal used. To be able to accept Freud’s estimation of Oedipus Tyrannus it is basic to butt what the Oedipus circuitous absolutely refers to. Afore discussing the Oedipus circuitous it is important to altercate the beforehand psychosexual development of a child, which leads into the development of the Oedipus complex. The aboriginal two stages, or the ‘pregenital’ stages, activate absolute aboriginal in life.
The aboriginal is the articulate stage, unsurprisingly, as breed aboriginal acquire animal amusement primarily through the mouth; such as tasting, sucking, and authoritative sounds. This date is followed by the anal stage, in which the babyish has credible the anus. This date is focused on the ascendancy of the cocky and gives the babyish the aboriginal befalling to accretion a faculty of adeptness and accomplishment through acquirements to ascendancy the bowel and bladder. With the abutting stage, the phallic stage, the Oedipus circuitous tarts becomes apparent. It is during this time that the babyish discovers the aberration amid a boy and girl, the boy begins to see the ancestor as a battling for his mother’s affections, but additionally develops a abhorrence of the ancestor acceptable a battling for the mother’s affections. Alongside these developments the adolescent finds the animal breadth as an amative zone. The ‘castration complex’ can advance throughout this aeon and it is important to anticipate of the macho and changeable adolescent as, ‘with penis’ or ‘castrated’, relatively.
Freud believed that the macho adolescent saw the changeable adolescent as a castrated boy and appropriately the aftereffect of, what seemed to be accepted in the about-face of the century, the blackmail of parents cogent adolescent boys to stop arena with their genitals or they will be cut off. The adolescent boy now believes that the ancestor becomes a absolute blackmail to the angel for his mother. Amid the age of four and five, Freud believed that the adolescent adolescent develops animal animosity for his mother, and alongside this wants to accept complete control of her and appropriately adverse animosity advance appear the father.
However, the achievability of castration that the adolescent boy has accepted to be apparent in the naked girl, poses a alarming achievability to the boy. With the accident of his penis at stake, as in the adolescent boy’s apperception this is the anatomy of backfire the ancestor will booty to any adverse activity from the child, the boy focuses his absorption appear alternative feminine sources for animal satisfaction. This is the Oedipus circuitous laid out as bare development of the adolescent boy and variations to this development through adolescence is how Freud can explain ‘abnormal’ animal behavior.
For the adolescent babe the Oedipus circuitous follows a altered aisle already the aberration amid boy and babe has been realised. The abridgement of a penis is seen, through the adolescent girl’s eyes, as the accountability of her mother, because of this the babe moves abroad from the charge to acquire the mother and begins to continued for the ancestor in a analogously animal address and the ambition for him to charge her. It is the consistent adolescent that Freud imagines can ‘cure’ the babe of her ‘penis envy’ seeing the babyish as a backup for the missing organ.
For Freud about the changeable never absolutely surpasses this date of penis envy. With Freud’s estimation of Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus it is the macho ancillary of the Oedipus circuitous that is discussed. It is accessible that Oedipus absolutely performs the accomplishments that one would aspect to the desires of the Oedipus circuitous actuality fulfilled: The annihilation of his ancestor and the animal abutment with his mother. Freud’s interpretation, however, seems to calmly avoid assertive aspects of Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus, which aloft assay accommodate obstacles for Freud’s approach to navigate.
In the development of his approach on the Oedipus complex, Freud undertook a abundant accord of cocky assay and as such it is ambiguous as to how generalised his thoughts can be acclimated to accept the animal development. Freud had apparent the comedy Oedipus Tyrannus and; “saw himself in a absolute accurate faculty as Oedipus. ” With this in apperception Freud’s estimation of Oedipus Tyrannus is not lessened in itself, but this does accept bearings on his estimation as affidavit of the Oedipus complex. Tragedy, as in all art forms, is accessible to estimation no amount what the aboriginal artisan advised as the meaning.
For Freud, Oedipus represents the fulfilment of the aboriginal animal desires appear the mother and the advancing behaviour appear the father. However, that Oedipus does not apperceive that these two bodies are his biological parents seems to belittle Freud’s use of Oedipus as an exemplum for his theory. Freud’s use of Oedipus is meant to appearance that the Oedipus circuitous “transcends time and place. ” That Oedipus has a abridgement of adeptness of his accurate parents doesn’t assume to affect Freud in his use of Oedipus in this way. In my opinion, however, this use is acutely at allowance to the point that Freud attempts to make.
A child, according to the Oedipus complex, that grew up with non-biological parents should accept had little to no aftereffect aloft the aboriginal stages that advance to the development of the Oedipus complex, appropriately little to no aftereffect aloft the circuitous itself. Oedipus was beatific abroad as an babyish to be killed, but instead grew up with altered parents. This, therefore, gives no acumen to anticipate that the abstraction that Oedipus sleeping with his biological mother and killing his biological ancestor is the Oedipus circuitous realising itself aural Oedipus.
The estimation by Freud seems to accept acclimated the acceptance of Oedipus Tyrannus, at the time he was developing his theory, to advice in popularising and answer the Oedipus complex. Although Freud himself seems to accept believed that Oedipus was, indeed, a acceptable archetype of his theory: Broken bottomward artlessly his altercation runs, 1. There is a accepted cerebral battle (Oedipus complex), as I accept credible in my analytic experience. 2. This is accepted by a ball which has accepted effectiveness. 3.
Why this ball is universally able can abandoned be accepted if my antecedent is correct. This advertence to why the ball is universally able is Freud’s acceptance that the comedy in itself is not that arduous a concept. According to Freud it is abandoned if his approach is absolute that the adeptness of Oedipus Tyrannus to accept had the “universal ability to move” at all. This accurate aural altercation leaves little advantage for Freud to be wrong, as the comedy has absolutely enjoyed bags of years of success.
This, however, is according to Freud. Freud’s estimation of Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus seems to always leave absolutely no allowance for a abridgement of the Oedipus circuitous actuality present. Throughout Freud seems to accept absent what abounding bodies absence in Oedipus Tyrannus, Some readers of the Oedipus Rex accept told me that they acquisition its atmosphere airless and oppressive: they absence the adverse acclaim that one gets from Antigone or the Prometheus Vinctus. They absence the adventuresomeness of Oedipus, he knows of his fate and yet he carries on.
His blinding represents the averseness of altruism for the accuracy in the apple and it is in this backbone portrayed Oedipus that one can accretion the adverse acclaim commonly accepted from a Tragedy. Freud’s estimation of Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus cannot be said to be an absolute antic interpretation. It is bright to see, back attractive at the Oedipus complex, that Oedipus fulfils the exact fantasy of the adolescent ‘Freudian’ boy. The Killing of his ancestor and accepting a animal accord with his mother, however, back the estimation is looked at carefully it is accessible to see that there are bright flaws.
The activity of the development of the Oedipus circuitous cannot activity appropriately if one of the parents is absent from childhood, let abandoned both of them. Oedipus fulfils the fantasy of the adolescent boy, but with the ‘wrong’ parents, alike admitting they are his biological parents. The abstraction that the Oedipus Tyrannus portrays the abstraction that no amount who, where, or back we exist, the circuitous is assured alike if it charcoal in the hidden ‘is’ ridiculous. If this was the case again it would accept been the baron and queen of Corinth that were circuitous in this play, Oedipus’ adoptive parents.
That Freud acquainted a abundant affinity amid himself and Oedipus is not ridiculous, in and of itself, it is the acceptance that his own self-analytical thoughts and the accomplishments of Oedipus are absolutely agnate that brings the estimation into question. Oedipus acted afterwards adeptness of his accurate parents, admitting Freud knew his parents and is discussing fantasy from adolescence as against to absolute action. The abstraction that Freud’s approach provides a acumen for Oedipus Tyrannus’ success is absolutely antic in nature. Oedipus is the adumbrative of the, admitting tragic, appearance of perseverance.
He knows his fate yet carries on to acquisition the truth, alike afterwards he has addled himself he does not blow until he has fabricated it to the armpit area he is prophesied to appear to peace. Freud’s estimation of Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus has abounding antic aspects to it, but the use to which Freud uses his estimation does absorb an aspect of credibility. Bibliography * Armstrong, R. H. Oedipus as Evidence: http://www. clas. ufl. edu/ipsa/journal/articles/psyart1999/oedipus/armstr01. htm (1998) * Gay, P the Freud clairvoyant (Vintage 1995) * Storr, A. Freud, A absolute abbreviate addition (Oxford Uni. Press 1989) * Dodds, E. R.
On confounding the Oedipus Rex Ed. E. Segal (Oxford Uni. Press 1983) * Simon, B. And Blass, R. The development and vicissitudes of Freud’s account on the Oedipus circuitous Ed. Neu, J (Cambridge Uni. Press 1991) -------------------------------------------- [ 1 ]. Gay (1995) xxxi [ 2 ]. Gay (1995) 273 [ 3 ]. Storr (1989) 33 [ 4 ]. Storr (1989) 34 [ 5 ]. Simon and Blass (1991) 170 [ 6 ]. Simon and Blass (1991)171 [ 7 ]. Oedipus as Evidence: http://www. clas. ufl. edu/ipsa/journal/articles/psyart1999/oedipus/armstr01. htm (1998) [ 8 ]. Oedipus as Evidence: http://www. clas. ufl. edu/ipsa/journal/articles/psyart1999/oedipus/armstr01. htm
Order a unique copy of this paper