EBP Nursing

Task 1: Analyzing Assay Articles

Introduction:

There are abounding sources of advice accessible on the web and in journals apropos to the nursing discipline. Therefore, it is of cardinal accent to accept the basal credo of analytical appraisement of assay for its use in interprofessional healthcare practices. The aim of evidence-based convenance (EBP) is to apply a three-pronged approach, aggregate the best accessible assay evidence, accommodating ethics and preferences, and analytic expertise.

In this task, you will appraisal two primary assay affirmation sources. You will baddest one quantitative and one qualitative peer-reviewed account commodity on a healthcare affair of interest.

Requirements:

Your acquiescence charge be your aboriginal work. No added than a accumulated absolute of 30% of the acquiescence and no added than a 10% bout to any one alone antecedent can be anon quoted or carefully paraphrased from sources, alike if cited correctly. An boldness address is provided back you abide your assignment that can be acclimated as a guide. 

You charge use the explanation to absolute the conception of your acquiescence because it provides abundant belief that will be acclimated to appraise your work. Each claim beneath may be evaluated by added than one explanation aspect. The explanation aspect titles may accommodate hyperlinks to accordant portions of the course. 

Note: Assay affirmation charge not be added than bristles years old.

Note: Upload a archetype of the abounding argument of the accessories with your submission.

Note: You may use the aforementioned affair and assay accessories on both Assignment 1: Analyzing Assay Accessories and Assignment 2: Evidence-Based Convenance Change. 

A.  Evaluate a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed account commodity (suggested breadth of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by accomplishing the following: 

Note: You may baddest an commodity absorption on a healthcare affair of your best or an commodity absorption on one of the afterward topics: avalanche and abatement prevention, affliction administration in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter-associated urinary amplitude infections, or duke hygiene and infections in hospitals.

1.  Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the called account article:

•   background or addition (e.g., the purpose of the study)

•   review of the abstract (e.g., assay acclimated to abutment the study)

•   data assay (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data)

•   methodology (e.g., assay blazon and sampling methods)

2.  Appraise whether the affirmation presented in each of the four areas of the account commodity from allotment A1 supports the aftereffect of the abstraction and implications for approaching research.

3.  Explain how the aegis of animal capacity and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, application specific advice from the account commodity from allotment A.

4.  Describe one strength and one limitation of the study.

5.  Describe how the affirmation from the commodity in allotment A informs accepted nursing practices.
 

B.  Evaluate a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed account commodity (suggested breadth of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by accomplishing the following: 

Note: You may baddest an commodity absorption on a healthcare affair of your best or an commodity absorption on one of the afterward topics: avalanche and abatement prevention, affliction administration in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter associated urinary amplitude infections, or duke hygiene and infections in hospitals. You may use the aforementioned affair that was acclimated in allotment A. 

1.  Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the called account article:

•   background or addition (e.g., the purpose of the study)

•   review of the abstract (e.g., assay acclimated to abutment the study)

•   data assay (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data)

•   methodology (e.g., assay blazon and sampling methods)

2.  Appraise whether the affirmation presented in each of the four areas of the account commodity from allotment B1 supports the aftereffect of the abstraction and implications for approaching research. 

3.  Explain how the aegis of animal capacity and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, application specific advice from the account commodity from allotment B. 

4.  Identify one strength and one limitation of the study. 

5.  Describe how the affirmation from the commodity in allotment B informs accepted nursing practices.
 

C.  Acknowledge sources, application APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for agreeable that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
 

D. Demonstrate able advice in the agreeable and presentation of your submission.

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal
Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp

Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code COURSEGUY