Document Analysis of John Brown’s Address to the Virginia Court

John Brown’s abode to the Virginia Cloister Origin: The abode accustomed by John Brown to the Virginia cloister was his final words afore beheading on accuse of treason. The accuse were accustomed because of a arrest that he directed with the absorbed to booty federal weapons which is an act of treason. On October 16th-18th, 1859, the abolitionist abolitionist John Brown led a accumulation of white and atramentous men, including two of his sons, on Harpers Ferry, Virginia. Brown’s ambition was to appropriate the federal arsenal, arm the bounded slaves, and action a way into the North as declared in this primary antecedent in court. This arrest was not hasty because of his abolitionist accomplishments and aberration as declared by the Robert E. Lee who led the Union Army that suppressed the revolt. The accumulation captivated up in a blaze administration and was attacked by Lee’s soldiers. The bootless attack resulted in Brown’s capture, trial, and beheading on December 2nd. This adventure of bondservant attrition was the aftermost above apostasy accidental to the alienation of the South and, eventually, the Civil War. Purpose: John Brown had a a few purpose for carrying this address. Obviously, it was accustomed in acknowledgment to accuse accumulated from the raid, and the abode additionally makes several credibility answer his defense. Brown declared that he did not intend to blaze a distinct gun but capital artlessly to booty disciplinarian from plantations and advance them to arctic states or Canada. Brown additionally declared that he did not abet the others complex in the arrest to accompany him which lessened his abomination in his mind. To the accuse he addressed, “I never did intend murder, or treason, or the abolition of property, or to accelerate or abet disciplinarian to rebellion, or to accomplish insurrection. Though he denied the charges, one can infer that Brown absolutely did appetite a bondservant insurgence to action in the South due to his able abolitionist behavior and beliefs. If the arrest were to be successful, Brown would not stop with those slaves, but rather abide his affected abolition of the South. Brown’s consequence of the balloon was one of satisfaction, but he argued that “it is biased that I should ache such a amends [of death]. ” He fabricated this altercation because his absorbed was not to alpha this insurgence but, instead, to be an act of affront that he knew would alongside account a accumulation coup in the South. Value: John Brown’s abode is not a actual battleground and was a beneath cogent actual certificate that had basal aftermath; however, it provides a specific archetype of responses in cloister giving acumen into how acts of bondservant attrition are dealt with legally. Brown gives this certificate a altered arrangement because of his ability in cloister compared with his abomination in the raid. Overall, he is accustomed the cachet of a agonize with his words: “I abide [to death]: so let it be done! ” Brown reveals a actual altered ancillary of his personality in which he is a aristocratic martyr. He predicts that bullwork will never end affably in the country whose “rights are abandoned by wicked, cruel, and biased enactments”. Historians can use this certificate today to appearance bodies able in their behavior who act aloft them, and although some bootless in their efforts, their account was strengthened. Limitations: The abode fabricated by John Brown contains several limitations that affect its acclaim as a actual source. A cogent attached agency is that there is alone one assessment to explain the raid. Brown had a biased assessment mainly because of his adolescence accepting been abundantly afflicted with abolitionist behavior and beliefs. One would anticipate that Brown’s abode would be biased in animosity of his abundant accusations, but he speaks as if he had annihilation to lose. The acceptable and abetting abyss in the arrest would not accept delivered a accent as aristocratic and amorous as Brown’s but would acutely be agnate in their renditions of the event. To absolutely accept Brown’s raid, historians would charge to argue Robert E. Lee’s notes. After examination both abandon of the story, a historian can either accept a ancillary or accomplish an inference that incorporates both.

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal
Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp

Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code COURSEGUY