Do a Rhetorical Analsysis of “Jeff Sessions Endless War on Marijuana” Article
Using the Toulmin Method, assay the altercation actuality fabricated in "Jeff Sessions Endless War on Marijuana"
1)What is the author's claim? Was the affirmation clear? Was the affirmation complete or was a qualifier used?
2)What are the author's reasons? (Remember the Reason(s) are affiliated to the affirmation by the chat "because"). Are the affidavit anemic or strong?
3)What affirmation does the columnist accommodate to abutment his affirmation and reasons? Is the affirmation anemic or strong? Too abundant pathos/anecdotal evidence? Not abundant logos/hard data?
4)What counter-arguments did the columnist present? Did he action a able acknowledgment to the adverse argument(s) or was the acknowledgment weak? Were there counter-arguments the columnist should accept considered?
5)What warrants (underlying assumptions) did you acquisition in the author’s argument? Were the warrants declared or unstated in the argument? Are there ambiguous warrants, things the columnist assumes the he or she shouldn’t assume?
6) What do you feel are the all-embracing strengths and weaknesses of the argument? In alternative words, are you assertive or not? Why?
Answer anniversary catechism alone NOT article format.
Order a unique copy of this paper