A Principal’s Responsibility for the Accomplishments of Their Abettor
Karen is arcade at Big Mart. She has with her an awning which is the aforementioned cast Big Mart carries. When a Big Mart employee, Steve, sees her leave with the awning after activity through the checkout lane, he asks her to appear aback into the store. Steve says that he thinks Karen is annexation the umbrella. Karen tells him that she has had the awning for years and shows him marks of abrasion and tear. Steve apologizes and tells Karen she is chargeless to go. Can Karen auspiciously sue for apocryphal imprisonment or defamation? From what you accept abstruse about the accord amid a arch and an agent, assay whether Steve or Big Mart could be accountable because of Steve’s actions.
Guided Response: Review your peer’s responses. For at atomic two of your classmates, actuate if your assay of the facts is the same. Do you accede with their appraisal or do you see the affair differently? Explain. Respond to at atomic two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7
Order a unique copy of this paper