Reading: Please note, you accept to log on to the NSU library to complete the link.
Feoick, R.C., & Jang, H.S. (2009). Nonprofits as bounded government account contractors. Accessible Administration Review, 69(4), 668-680.
http://lib.nova.edu/211 (Links to an alien site.)
Gilbert, B. A., Audretsch, D. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2004). The actualization of entrepreneurship
policy. Small Business Economics, 22(3/4), 313-323. doi:10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000022235.10739.a8
http://lib.nova.edu/129 (Links to an alien site.)
Holcombe, R. G. (2002). Political entrepreneurship and the autonomous allocation of economic
resources. The Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2-3), 143-159.
http://lib.nova.edu/163 (Links to an alien site.)
Kreft, S. F., & Sobel, R. S. (2005). Accessible policy, entrepreneurship, and bread-and-butter freedom. Cato
Journal, 25(3), 595-615.
http://lib.nova.edu/133 (Links to an alien site.)
Lerner, J. (2014). Entrepreneurship, accessible policy, and cities (Policy Research Working Paper
6880), Retrieved from the World Bank web site: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/18750/WPS6880.pdf?sequence=1 (Links to an alien site.)
Due: Essay 4 Question: We can apparently accede that one of the best basal functions of government is to accommodate services. One of the bottom known, but appropriately important is how government, as a accessible entity, intervenes in the accessible sector. In fact, this has been activity on throughout our nation's history. How can ambitious accessible administration be chip with the bend of accessible intervention? For those of you advancing to us from the non-profit sector, you can use that bend in your response.
Order a unique copy of this paper