Dell Case: Study of Expansion Strategy
Dell Computers was started by Michael Dell in 1984. Dell’s primary differentiator was its business model. It awash primarily on the B2C bazaar and custom-built claimed computers on demand. Therefore, it had a absolute low annual in allegory to its competitors. As a aftereffect of this, Dell was able to accomplish absolutely calmly and profitably in its alcove market. By the backward 1980s – the aboriginal 1990s, Dell noticed that its bazaar allotment was alone 1% of the absolute and that industry amalgamations could potentially force Dell out of the market.
It was time to accomplish a decision; it could abide cachet quo or accompany an advancing advance strategy. The closing advantage accepted to be favorable and Dell broadcast into the B2B exchange through a advance plan that focused on affairs to retailers to advance its bazaar share. The plan formed and Dell saw consecutive acquirement increases of 268% aural two years, compared to industry advance of 5%. 1 The acceptable times came to an end in 1993 back Dell acquaint its aboriginal accident afterwards eleven consecutive abode of profit. Dell absitively to added calmly administer its liquidity, profitability, and advance and was exited the aberrant retail approach area margins were awfully low. The retail approach had served its purpose, however, in acceptable Dell as a cast to become able-bodied accepted throughout the bazaar place. Afterward these measures, and the actuality that Dell had awfully low about inventory, they were able to become the aboriginal aggregation to barrage the new Pentium dent computers and advance first-mover cachet with consecutive upgrades.
Michael Dell was now in a position to anticipation approaching advance for his company.
Statement of Problem
Michael Dell predicted that the company’s advance bulk for the abutting year would afresh outdistance the industry. Dell bare to focus on how its alive basic activity could abetment in costs approaching growth. Further, what alternative centralized and alien costs options ability abetment Dell in extensive their goals?
Assuming Dell’s sales will abound at 50% in 1997, how would you acclaim that the aggregation armamentarium this growth?
How abundant basic would charge to be bargain and/or accumulation allowance added if the aggregation were to armamentarium its advance by relying alone on centralized sources of capital? What accomplish would you acclaim the aggregation take? Dell's attack to access its sales by 50% in 1997 will crave 2 aloft types of investments: Advance in alive basic We appraisal this bulk to be $345M (please accredit to Exhibit 1 for the abundant calculation). Advance in anchored assets Amplification of assembly will best acceptable crave the acquirement of the added equipment.
There is no abstracts accessible in the case of abrasion costs or basic expenditures fabricated by Dell in 1996 to abutment the 52% advance of sales. However, if we accredit to Dell’s abounding banking statements for 1996, we see that Dell spent $100M on basic expenditures and we accept it will absorb about the aforementioned bulk in 1997.
From the projected abstracts in Exhibit 1 we achieve that Dell will be able to accounts the aloft investments application the afterward allotment sources:
Profit margins and administration of the alive basic aeon Assuming that there is a assertive allotment of anchored costs in Dell’s bulk structure, the aggregation will be able to access its net accumulation allowance from 5. 1% in 1996 to 5. 6% in 1997, breeding a net accumulation of $448M. Net allowance should be acceptable to awning added alive basic of $345 M if Dell is able to advance its Banknote Conversion Aeon (CCC) at 1996 levels of 47 days. Advancement the CCC at the aforementioned akin is acute for this blazon of costs to be sufficient.
An access in DSO by 5 canicule will access alive basic basin up to $453M (refer to Exhibit 2) and will force Dell to access margins, which may abate revenues, or attending for alternative sources of funding. Debt or use of the abbreviate appellation advance funds The use of these assets ability be all-important for costs the acquirement of the accessories to aggrandize the assembly capacity.
Two scenarios could booty place:
A one-off advance is adapted to be fabricated at the alpha of the year. Since the aggregation will accept no achievability to accomplish profits or chargeless up its alive capital, it could either banknote some of its abbreviate appellation investments of $591M or get a loan. The accommodation will depend on whether the bulk of acknowledgment on advance is college or lower than the absorption bulk on the loan, demography after-tax furnishings into consideration. If the bulk of acknowledgment is higher, Dell should accounts the acquirement of anchored assets through the loan, if it is lower, it should use its advance annual to accounts the basic expenditure.
Gradual advance in basic bulk is possible. This could be done alone by application margins generated aural the year and abatement in CCC by managing the receivables-days cycle. If the aggregation can administer to abatement its DSO canicule from 50 to 40 days, it can abate its alive basic basin to $126M (Exhibit 2), appropriately authoritative the absolute net accumulation accessible for basic expenditures. How, if at all, would your answers to Catechism 3 change if Dell additionally repurchased $500 actor of accepted banal in 1997 and repaid its abiding debt? If Dell decides to accord its debt of $113M and repurchase banal of $500M, the afterward accomplish could be undertaken.
Stock repurchase A abatement in DSO by 10 canicule and access in DPO by 10 canicule will absolution alive basic of $44M in accession to banknote accumulation based on $448M in accounting accumulation (most acceptable it is college by the bulk of depreciation). These banknote amounts will again acquiesce Dell to repurchase its stock. As Dell expands its chump abject and cast assimilation in the bazaar it can alpha alive with accommodation for its orders which will advice to aggregate the banknote faster. Further, as the admeasurement of its orders to suppliers grows, it will be able to exercise its client ability and accommodate added favorable acquittal terms.
However, the afterward activity should be taken alone if Dell shareholders could acquire a bigger acknowledgment at a agnate akin of accident in the market. In the accepted situation, it seems that Dell performs bigger than its competitors appropriately it would be added adapted to advance the $500Mof chargeless banknote in added expansion. Debt claim If Dell increases its allowance up to 6. 8% it will be able to accomplish an added $110M in net accumulation to accord the debt. Another advantage is to chargeless up some funds from abbreviate appellation investments. The accommodation will depend on whether an access in bulk will advance to a cogent accident of customers.
If this is the case, the aggregation should use its accepted banknote affluence to accomplish the repayment. We additionally note, that 0% of debt in the basic anatomy is best acceptable to be not optimal for the company, and by application advantage Dell will be able to accomplish bigger allotment for its investors.
Explain how Dell’s alive basic activity is a aggressive advantage for the company?
Distribution Channels (Retail Stores)
Early Adoption of New Technology
Built to Order: Unit assembly alone begins afterwards accepting chump orders over the buzz or via email.
This decidedly bargain the outstanding annual and appropriately bargain alive basic requirements for allotment annual warehousing and annual financing. Just-in-time Delivery: Dell’s branch had abutting concrete adjacency to its suppliers. Suppliers would address genitalia alone afterwards barter placed orders, for just-in-time delivery. This helped to advance accounts payable to a minimum. No Retail Administration Channels: Since orders were alone taken via email or phone, Dell was able to cut bottomward on the costs of advancement administration channels and abate accounts receivable from distributors and retailers.
This bargain alive basic requirements. Aboriginal Adoption of New Technology: Low annual levels helped Dell to bound about-face to newer artefact upgrades and abate the bulk of absolute annual turnovers compared to competitors. This added bargain alive basic requirements. DSI Advantage: As a aftereffect of the aloft strategies, Dell accomplished an boilerplate DSI of 40 amid 1993 and 1995, compared to Apple’s 64, Compaq’s 68 & IBM’s 56. How did Dell armamentarium its 52% advance in 1996?
Please be abiding to analyze amid centralized and alien sources of funding, and to altercate the accommodation amid the use of alien funds in adjustment to advance aerial advance rates. The 52% advance was a aftereffect of the new Pentium dent addition (Exhibit 3 from the case). Regarding alive basic management, we noticed from Exhibit 2 from the case, accomplished achievement in advancement CCC at 40 days; while artefact switches adapted bifold banal management. As the Pentium addition was already launched in 1995, we accept that advance was connected and connected during the 1996 period.
Compared to 1995, the 1996 banking achievement for gross allowance is lower by 1%, but net accumulation has added by 1%.
To advance the availability of cash, Dell can apparatus factoring on receivables (internal) or accommodate with banks for abbreviate appellation acclaim curve and defalcation accounts (external). Even if CCC charcoal connected during this aeon of growth, antithesis bedding assay shows that CCC afflicted from $428M in 1995 to $689M in 1996. As the debt akin remained connected during these two periods, this added $261M was financed with centralized funds.
The two basic sources of centralized funds acclimated to accounts alive basic and CAPEX (not abundant in case information) were: The $272M 1996 net accumulation and the basic access at $74M (total banal bulk aberration amid 1995 and 1996). Even if Dell absitively to not abate its bulk of debt, this action will acquiesce the aggregation to abate the Debt/Equity arrangement befitting a connected akin of debt while decidedly accretion equity. This activity will accompany Dell added adaptability for the future.
The close will be able to accede altered options for approaching growth; either the aforementioned activity - the arising of added debt due to their low advantage actuality almost unleveraged.
Projected Assets account and antithesis area items for the year 1997
Item Sales Bulk of sales Gross Allowance Operating costs Operating assets Costs and alternative assets Assets taxes 30%
Net accumulation 1996 (actual) 5 296 4 229 1 067 690 377 6 111 272 Advance Accessory 1,5 1,5 1,4
1997 (projected) 7 944 6 344 1 601 966 635 6 192 448
Ratios : 37 1 37
DSI 50 1 50
DSO 40 1 40
DPO 47 1 47
Balance area items: 429 644
Inventory 726 1 089
Accounts receivable 466 699
Accounts payable 689 1 034
Working Basic 345
Additional alive basic adapted Projections for the year 1997 were congenital based on the afterward assumptions:
Growth accessory of 1,5 was activated to assets sales and bulk of sales to reflect the projected 50% advance in operations
Growth accessory of 1,4 was activated to operating expenses. The acceptance was fabricated that allotment of operating costs are presented by anchored costs appropriately they don’t abound at the operations advance ration. 0% bulk was taken based on the year 1996 increase.
Income taxes were affected application 30% bulk is the bulk on assets tax in 1996 (calculated as Assets taxes/(Operating assets + Costs income))
Ratios for the year 199 were affected application the afterward formulas: DSI=Inventory*365/COS DSO=Accounts Receivable*365/Sales DPO=Accounts Payable*365/COS
We affected that the aggregation will advance the boilerplate ratios for the year 1997
6. Application the about-face blueprint for ratios calculations we acquired accounts receivable, accounts payable, and annual for 1999 from the projected sales and COS figures.
We affected Alive Basic for both years application the formula: Annual + Accounts receivable – Accounts payable
Additional alive basic required: Alive basic 1997 – Alive Basic 1996
Variations in alive basic requirements 37 50 40 47 37 55 40 52 37 40 40 37 -10 canicule on DSO; + 10 canicule in DPO 37 40 50 27 Inventory, $mln Accounts receivable, $mln Accounts payable, $mln 644 1 088 699 643 1 197 695 643 871 695 643 871 869
Working Basic 1997, $mln
Working Basic 1996, $mln 1 033 689 1 145 689 818 689 645 689 344 456 129 -44 Item
DSI, canicule DSO, canicule DPO, canicule CCC, days
Additional alive basic required, $mln Ratios at 1996 akin +5 canicule in DSO -10 canicule in DSO
Detailed calculations about to catechism N°2
1 - CCC account calculation: (see abstracts in red rectangle) CCC = DSI + DSO – DPO
From aloft table, CCC = inventories + Accounts receivables – Accounts payable
CCC1995 = 293 + 538 – 403 = 428 M$
CCC1996 = 429 + 726 – 466 = 689 M$
2 – Absolute stocks value: (see abstracts in dejected rectangle)
Total bulk = Preferred stocks + Accepted stocks
1995 = 362 M$
1996 = 436 M$
Richard Ruback, “Dell’s Alive Capital,” Harvard Business Review 9-201-029 (2003)
Order a unique copy of this paper