Read the afterward scenarios and acknowledgment anniversary prompt.
Communication and Accord The branches of bent amends may arise to action autonomously, but there is a lot of alternation and accord amid them. In this allotment of the career investigation, you will charge to anticipate about some scenarios area advice and accord would be appropriate for these branches to action finer and which annex appears to be added in band with how you access advice and collaboration.
a) How does the adeptness to conduct acknowledged searches alter amid the badge officer, acquittal officer, and bastille bouncer in the achievement of their duties? Give an archetype of interagency accord back administering a acknowledged search.
b) A badge administrator was administering an analysis involving an confined prisoner. The badge administrator would like to apperceive who the captive batten to on the buzz and who visited him. Describe who the badge administrator would charge to coact with to access that information, answer why.
c) Lou, a doubtable the administrator was investigating in a break-in case, was aloof bedevilled for that crime. Prior to his sentence, a pre-sentence address charge be conducted. Who is best acceptable to conduct the investigation: the badge officer, acquittal officer, or the bastille guard? Who will he or she coact with to complete the report? Support your acknowledgment by answer how this action impacts interagency collaboration.
d) Select one cloister case area advice and accord were active factors, and altercate the appulse of that case in about-face the role of the corrections practitioner. Choose one of the three cases beneath to complete analytical aspect D. You will use this aforementioned case abstraction back appointment your final project:
Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976) https://www.law.uh.edu/healthlaw/perspectives/2009/(CC)%20Prison%20Health.pdf Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) http://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/family-law/family-law-keyed-to-weisberg/getting-married/turner-v-safley/ In Re Rosenkrantz, 116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 69 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002) http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20CACO%2020090218046/IN%20RE%20ROSENKRANTZ
e) Based on your allegation apropos the differences in how anniversary annex communicates with anniversary other, which career aisle is best in band with your advice and accord practices and why?
Guidelines for Submission: Word document, this should be 1–2 pages with 12-point Times New Roman chantry and one-inch margins. Your cardboard charge accommodate at atomic two sources cited in APA format.
Order a unique copy of this paper