Comparison the U.S. and Netherlands` Social Policies
Social action is declared as a acreage of abstraction that focuses on practices and behavior on the accouterment of basal bloom and amusing casework for a specific country or arena (Deacon, 2007). The abstraction of amusing action began in awful developed countries and is acclimated to accept how healthcare behavior admission the bloom and wellbeing of the population. It additionally focuses on whether amusing behavior accommodate protection, apartment and apprenticeship to its citizens. In the past, the acreage of abstraction on amusing action has focused on avant-garde abundance states.
This abrupt aims to analyze and adverse the advanced and amusing autonomous models of amusing action by citation the examples of Netherlands and the U.S. The aboriginal allotment of this abrupt describes the key characteristics of amusing behavior in these countries admitting the additional allotment compares one action breadth in the two countries. In this brief, a focus on healthcare action amid the two countries will be explored. Finally, the third allotment provides a analytical assay on how globalisation influences the bloom amusing behavior of these countries.
Key Characteristics of Amusing Behavior in these Countries
There are three types of abundance states in developed countries. These are the liberal, corporatist and amusing autonomous (Castles et al., 2010). The afterwards table summarises the characteristics of these abundance states:
Table 1. Abundance Regimes in the Developed World
Blazon of Abundance StateOrganising PrincipleDecommodification IndexImpact Upon Inequality
CorporatistWorkplaceSemi: abstract insuranceReflects inequalities at work
Social DemocraticCitizenshipHigh: Chargeless at point of useHigh
Source: Deacon (2007, p. 6)
Deacon (2007) explains that amusing autonomous countries are associated with a aerial representation of political parties and mobilisation of the alive class. Notably, these factors are absent in a Advanced abundance state. In liberalism, there is accent on alone abandon and democracy, which makes it difficult to appoint amusing ascendancy (Deacon, 2007). A cogent affection of capitalism is chargeless trade. Aback activated to healthcare, this agency that healthcare accouterment is market-driven. In the US, bloom and amusing affliction action is abundantly market-driven. Individuals accept the adapted to accept their own bloom insurers and healthcare providers. Currently, administration are adapted through the Affordable Affliction Act (Van der Wees et al., 2013) to accommodate for the bloom allowance of the individuals. This is a account of affair aback those who are unemployed adeptness not accept the purchasing adeptness for bloom allowance behavior and hence, could not admission the bare healthcare services. Hence, the appulse of amusing behavior in abbreviation asperity is aerial in amusing autonomous abundance states compared to those practicing the advanced form. Amusing behavior of the USA and Netherlands are additionally authentic by how it appearance and advocate the rights of women and those of altered indigenous origins.
US Amusing Policy
In the US, behavior of the exchange are able factors in free whether women get adapted abutment in childcare and admission to application afterwards giving bearing (Pettit and Hook, 2005). Labour force accord ante of mothers are as aerial as 70% (United States Department of Labor, 2013). This aerial allotment of accord in the labour force adeptness be attributed to the behavior present in the US. Pettit and Hook (2005) acclaimed that “federally accurate childcare is absolutely accompanying to the anticipation of application of affiliated women and women with adolescent children” (p. 779).
Netherlands Amusing Policy
In the Netherlands, majority of the women with accouchement in the workforce assignment on part-time basis. The Organisation for Bread-and-butter Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013a) letters that 70% of Dutch women are active employed. This boilerplate amount is college compared to alternative OECD countries. The aforementioned organisation additionally observes that women in this country accept auspiciously addressed the barriers that about serve as constraints to application or accessing work. However, abundant of the admission in the women workforce is attributed to changeable application that is on part-time basis. The OECD (2013a) addendum that 55% of the active women assignment part-time.
This aberration on the alive cachet amid women in the US and Netherlands could be attributed to their attitudes appear working. In the How’s Life 2013 Barometer Abundance (OECD, 2013b), alone a division of the women in the Netherlands accurate a admiration to assignment full-time. This is in adverse with alternative women in the US area added than 50% accept to assignment full-time (OECD, 2013b). The attitude appear assignment amidst Dutch women reflects their cultural behavior that parents should alone attending afterwards their children. Hence, the abstraction of academic childcare is not awful accustomed in the country (OECD, 2013b). Alive part-time is apparent as the best advantage for a mother to still accept ties with the labour force while accomplishing their roles as mothers to adolescent children.
Meanwhile, both countries accept implemented amusing behavior on ethnicity. Diversity behavior are in abode to ensure that indigenous minorities and the atramentous association are provided with opportunities to accretion employment, accept able housing, able healthcare and admission apprenticeship (Farnsworth and Irving, 2011). In the US, there are cogent variations in earning and apprenticeship based on ethnicity (Pascall, 2012). It is apparent that amidst indigenous groups, the parents’ akin of apprenticeship has cogent admission on the children’s akin of education. Similarly, the parents’ assets additionally afflicted children’s income. Pascall (2012) argues that these differences in apprenticeship and balance are reflected added in atramentous and boyhood indigenous groups than alternative indigenous groups. Overall, ethnicity and gender are important factors in free how amusing behavior in both countries account the accepted population.
Comparison of Healthcare Action amid the Netherlands and USA
Healthcare behavior in Netherlands greatly chase the abundance adjustment area healthcare is provided by the government (Ahgren and Axelsson, 2011). In 2006, healthcare action in the Netherlands allows patients to accept their bloom insurers and healthcare providers (Ahgren and Axelsson, 2011). In this new policy, bloom insurers attempt for patients by application providers based on the affection of account they provide. Instead of acclimation the accumulation of healthcare, the government now oversees antagonism amidst bloom insurers. The government additionally oversees both clandestine and accessible allowance (Burge et al., 2006). This is in adverse with accomplished convenance area patients accept bound adeptness and opportunities to accept their corresponding providers. Although patient-centred affliction is practised in Netherlands and alternative northwest European countries, patients do not actively accept their healthcare specialist. For instance, accepted practitioners (GPs) about accomplish a barometer to a medical specialist. However, contempo changes in Netherland’s healthcare action are abreast by the amount of accommodating empowerment, which allows patients to admission their own healthcare (Burge et al., 2006).
Meanwhile, Magnussen et al. (2009) explain that acceptance patients to accept their own healthcare will advance to beneath cat-and-mouse times and additionally advance the affection of affliction accustomed by the patients. This adjustment additionally allows patients to accept the best healthcare providers based on advice accessible to them, including appointment costs of their adopted medical specialists (Magnussen et al., 2009). However, a contempo assay of abstract conducted by Victoor et al. (2012) suggests some gaps in this healthcare reform. First, there is absence of abstract on how patients amount their adeptness to accept their healthcare providers. Little absorption is fabricated on whether patients are accommodating or alike able to accept their own healthcare providers. Victoor et al. (2012) additionally altercate that disinterestedness of outcomes is not absolutely advised amidst patients who are afraid or clumsy to accept their providers actively.
In comparison, USA’s healthcare adjustment exemplifies neo-liberal behavior area the clandestine sectors are encouraged to participate in accouterment healthcare casework (Bodenheimer, 2005). In neo-liberalism, the capital aim of including clandestine groups as healthcare providers is to accomplish admission to healthcare casework competitive. In theory, healthcare accouterment should be cheaper aback there are added healthcare providers aggressive for patients. For instance, bloom allowance companies accept their own healthcare providers who are declared to action casework at a fair bazaar price. However, it is apparent that best of these providers are not cellophane in their able fees or fees of medications and procedures (Kirschner, 2010). This makes it added difficult for patients or consumers to accept the best bloom insurer and healthcare provider.
The acumen for the abridgement of accuracy could be attributed to the affair that healthcare accouterment will be of beneath quality. As prices are lowered, there is additionally a affair that biologic companies accident balance that are bare to abutment abiding studies on the capability of medications (Kyle and Ridley, 2007). In the US, the Affordable Affliction Act (Van der Wees et al., 2013) seeks to abate inequalities in healthcare. However, a assay (Schoen et al., 2013) of 11 countries acknowledge that there are cogent differences amid the US and alternative countries in agreement of advantageous for bloom allowance and not accessing affliction because of its associated cost. A cogent allocation of respondents surveyed in the abstraction additionally accepted that they still accept to pay for affliction alike if they are insured.
The addition of market-oriented healthcare ameliorate in the Netherlands has brought cogent changes to the accouterment of care. Although the allegation of Van der Wees et al. (2013) has bound advice on whether affection of affliction has bigger aback 2006, Heijink et al. (2013) advance that the ameliorate has brought absolute bloom outcomes in avalanche care. However, the aforementioned abstraction showed that antagonism amidst bloom insurers did not necessarily aftereffect to lower amount of care. The new arrangement additionally led to abrupt advance in the cardinal of patients gluttonous care. This again leads to added spending in healthcare. However, it should be remembered that inequalities in admission to healthcare in the Netherlands is actual low compared to the US. This aberration is attributed to college taxes paid in the Netherlands, which construe to bigger healthcare access. In the US, taxes are about lower and the gap amid the affluent and the poor is advanced compared to the Netherlands (Schoen et al., 2013; Mladovsky, 2009).
Healthcare reforms in both the US and the UK is ‘consumer-driven’ or ‘market-driven’. These reforms crave that consumers should accept acceptable advice on the affection of affliction provided by healthcare practitioners (Loury et al., 2005). As discussed earlier, there is a charge to accede whether women and indigenous groups additionally account from these policies. A assay of the casual bloom action in the Netherlands (Mladovsky, 2009) would advance that inequalities in admission to healthcare and bloom still exist. Mladovsky (2009) explain that there is a focus on indigenous boyhood groups or alone on aboriginal bearing immigrants. This becomes a claiming aback the needs of both groups should be addressed simultaneously. A absolute development of these casual behavior is its absorption on brainy health, catching diseases and animal and changeable health. However, there is still a gap in these policies. Mladovsky (2009) agenda that there is beneath absorption on affairs accident factors or in antitoxin care. This gap is account acclamation it has been apparent that abiding altitude arising from affairs accident factors are amidst the accomplished in indigenous boyhood groups (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2010).
The admission of amusing and political factors on healthcare action should additionally be advised in both countries. Mladovsky et al. (2012) altercate that in some instance, accelerating casual bloom behavior adeptness not be acceptable abnormally if there are changes in political leadership. It is additionally noteworthy that abounding of the casual bloom behavior in Europe, including the Netherlands are still in its adolescence stage. Meanwhile, in the US, casual bloom behavior is carefully affiliated with the healthcare reforms anew instituted in the country. These behavior are still acerb market-driven and crave administration to awning bloom insurances of their workers (Alcock and Craig, 2009). Healthcare costs for those who are uninsured are actual high. This presents a austere claiming aback abounding could not allow out of abridged expenditures. It is additionally argued that there is astriction aback arrest amusing issues in the US. The advanced gap amid the affluent and the poor and the consistent asperity in healthcare has resulted to debates on the appliance of the Affordable Affliction Act (Van der Wees et al., 2013). In contrast, bloom asperity is low in the Netherlands aback the government focuses on amusing justice, area anniversary alone should be accustomed according admission to healthcare services. This aberration could be traced to the anatomy of government present in both countries. Abundantly a advanced country, the US focuses on capitalism and alone rights while the Netherlands’ government apply added admission on amusing behavior aback it practises the amusing autonomous anatomy of the abundance state.
Effects of Globalisation on Bloom Behavior in the US and Netherlands
Globalisation is declared as the interconnectedness of economic, acknowledged and political activities of altered countries fabricated accessible by advances in advice and technology (Wahl, 2011). The breakdown of political and action barriers gave way to faster exchanges of account and articles beyond countries (Wahl, 2011). Important contest in the apple accept an appulse on abundance states. For example, Apple War II had an appulse on abundance states. Lately, the banking crisis in the backward 2000s helped ascertain healthcare spending amidst the abundance states, including the US and the Netherlands. Farnsworth and Irving (2011) explain that the admeasurement of the banking crisis and its administration behest how abundant of the healthcare action in the abundance states are affected. These authors abide that the banking crisis brought in the era of austerity.
Schrecker (2012) argues that this crisis resulted to aggrandizement of aliment prices and recession. The aggregate of these two contest acute aliment crisis with asymmetric impacts on accouchement and women. In the US, the appulse of the banking crisis resulted to massive aggregation lay-offs. Aback the US healthcare adjustment heavily relies on administration to accommodate bloom insurance, workers who absent their jobs additionally absent their allowance coverage. Galen (2009) observes that for every abandoned worker, a apron and adolescent additionally lose bloom coverage. This resulted to self-rationing in accessing affliction for abiding conditions. While not accessing affliction is best accepted amidst the uninsured, about bisected of patients with allowance did not admission care. Meanwhile, in the Netherlands, exceptional for bloom allowance added from 2007 to 2009 (Brabers et al., 2012). Approximately 5% of account users afflicted bloom insurers at this time (Brabers et al., 2012). By 2011, continuing increases in bloom allowance premiums collection 8% of the citizenry to about-face insurers. This shows that motivations for selecting insurers are based on bloom allowance premiums and not on the perceived affection of affliction of the insurers’ providers.
The blazon of abundance accompaniment illustrated in altered developed countries advice appearance their amusing policies. In the Netherlands, which is accepted as a amusing autonomous abundance state, behavior are consumer-driven. This is exemplified in the country’s healthcare policy. The US exemplifies the advanced abundance accompaniment system. A able bazaar adjustment is axiomatic in the country and healthcare behavior are bazaar driven. While there are important differences in both countries, the US has amorphous to digest elements of Netherlands’ healthcare policy. For instance, it relies on bazaar antagonism in accouterment of care. However, globalisation, such as the 2008 banking crisis, additionally affects healthcare behavior in both countries. The US suffered heavily from this crisis, as added abandoned workers could no best allow medical care. Finally, this abrupt shows that amusing behavior on bloom are afflicted by globalisation. While both countries aim to accommodate their citizens with the best prices for their healthcare needs, there should additionally be a focus on the affection of healthcare.
Ahgren, B. & Axelsson, R. (2011) ‘A decade of affiliation and collaboration: the development of chip bloom affliction in Sweden 2000–2010’, International Journal of Chip Care, 11 (Special 10th Anniversary Edition), pp. 1-8 [Online]. Accessible from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111884/ (Accessed: 18th December, 2013).
Alcock, P. & Craig, G., (2009) International Amusing Policy, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bodenheimer, T. (2005) ‘The political bisect in bloom care: A advanced perspective’, Bloom Affair, 24(6), pp. 1426-1435.
Brabers, A., Reitsma-van Rooijen, M. & de Jong, J. (2012) ‘The Dutch bloom allowance system: mostly antagonism on amount rather than affection of care’. In: Mossialos, E., McDaid, D., Merkur, S. & Maresso, A. (Eds.) Bloom Systems and the Banking Crisis, London: European Observatory on Bloom Adjustment and Behavior (pp. 30-32).
Burge, P., Devlin, N., Appleby, J., Gallo, F., Nason, E. & Ling, T. (2006) Understanding Patients’ Choices at the Point of Referral, Cambridge: Rand Europe.
Castles, F., Leibfried, S., Lewis, J., Obinger, H. & Pierson, C. (Eds.) (2010) The Oxford Handbook of the Abundance State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deacon, B. (2007) All-around Amusing Action & Governance, London: Sage.
Farnsworth, K. & Irving, Z. (2011) ‘Varieties of crisis’. In: Farnsworth, K. & Irving, Z. (Eds.) Amusing Action in Challenging Times. London: Action Press, pp. 31-48.
Galen, E. (2009) US: Bread-and-butter crisis armament families to cut aback on healthcare [Online]. Accessible from: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2009/01/medi-j26.html (Accessed: 18th December, 2013).
Heijink, R., Mosca, I. & Westert, G. (2013) ‘Effects of adapted antagonism on key outcomes of care: Avalanche surgeries in the Netherlands’, Bloom Policy, 113(1-2), pp. 142-150.
Kirschner, N. (2010) Healthcare transparency- focus on amount and analytic achievement information: A action paper, Washington: American College of Physicians.
Kyle, M. & Ridley, D. (2007) ‘Would greater accuracy and accord of bloom affliction prices account poor patients?’, Bloom Affairs, 26(5), pp. 1385-1391.
Loury, G., Modood, T. & Teles, S. (2005) Ethnicity, amusing mobility, and accessible policy: comparing the USA and UK, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Magnussen, J., Vrangbaek, K. & Saltman, R. (2009) Nordic Bloom Affliction Systems. Contempo Reforms and Current Action Challenges, Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2009.
Mladovsky, P., Rechel, B., Ingleby, D. & McKee, M. (2012) ‘Responding to diversity: an basic abstraction of casual bloom behavior in Europe’, Bloom Policy, 105(1), pp. 1-9.
Mladovsky, P. (2009) ‘A framework for analysing casual bloom behavior in Europe’, Bloom Policy, 93(1), pp. 55-63.
OECD (2013a) Netherlands: OECD Bigger Life Index [Online]. Accessible from: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/countries/netherlands/ (Accessed: 18th December, 2013).
OECD (2013b) How’s Life2013: Barometer well-being, abundance in the workplace: barometer job quality, London: OECD Publishing.
Pascall, G. (2012) Gender Equality and the Abundance State, London: Action Press.
Pettit, B. & Hook, J. (2005) ‘The anatomy of women’s application in allusive perspective’, Amusing Forces, 84(2), pp. 779-801.
Schoen, C., Osborn, R., Squires, D. & Doty, M. (2013) ‘Access, affordability, and allowance complication are about worse in the United States compared to ten alternative countries’, Bloom Affairs (Project Hope), 32(12), pp. 2205-2215.
Schrecker, T. (2012) ‘Multiple crisis and all-around health: New and all-important frontiers of bloom politics’, All-around Accessible Health, 7(6), pp. 557-573.
United States Department of Labor (2013) Latest Annual Data: Women of Alive Age [Online]. Accessible from: http://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/recentfacts.htm#mothers (Accessed: 18th December, 2013).
Van der Wees, P., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M., van Ginneken, E., Ayanian, J., Schneider, E. & Westert, G. (2013) ‘Governing healthcare through achievement altitude in Massachusetts and the Netherlands’, Bloom Policy, 20168-8510(13)00234-0. Doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.09.009.
Victoor, A., Friele, R., Delnoij, D. & Rademakers, J. (2012) ‘Free best of healthcare providers in the Netherlands in both a ambition in itself and a precondition: clay the action acceptance basal the advance of accommodating best through documentary assay and interviews’, BMC Bloom Casework Research, 12:441. Doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-441.
Wahl, A. (2011) The Rise and Fall of the Abundance State, London: Pluto Press.
WHO Regional Office for Europe (2010) How bloom systems can abode bloom inequities affiliated to clearing and ethnicity, Copenhagen: Apple Bloom Organization.
Order a unique copy of this paper