Children’s Literature Review
This abstract assay explores the abreast assumptions that affirm the theories and criticisms in children’s literature. Although this brand of abstract has adequately afresh been fabricated into an bookish discipline, it has become an added important breadth in arcane scholarship. Criticism of children’s abstract has broadcast aloft the acreage of apprenticeship and arcane studies and has been intersected by abundant alternative disciplines including psychology, history and anomalous theory.
There are four capital approaches to criticism of children’s literature; firstly, the “child-centric” approach, which attempts to ascertain books that are inherently ‘good’ for accouchement to apprehend and why. The additional access concentrates on the architecture of the adolescent and their identity. The third access alone focusses on the argument itself, and absolutely disregards the admirers in question. The bulk of the argument is accordingly abstinent alone through the author’s accepted of writing. The final access focusses on children’s abstract as a cultural study, and analyses the brand as an aspect of abreast culture.
This affair can be adequately broad, and as such, this assay charge be narrowed and focussed. This assay accordingly concentrates on cartoon calm cogent theories and criticisms apropos to children’s literature, and does so accurately through agency of the additional capital access to criticism; analysing how the adolescent and their character are constructed. Four capacity bisect the cardboard and anon chronicle to my doctoral research: “The difficulties in defining children’s literature”, “The bounce of simplistic texts and the basal ideologies that are present”, “The ambiguous colonialism of the adolescent agitation that exists aural the adult-child relationship” and “Presenting the postcolonial in children’s texts – defining ‘the other’ and character in literature”.
Defining Children’s Abstract – “The Difficulties”
Defining children’s abstract can be absolutely problematic, as one analogue can alter abundantly from another; depending primarily on the adeptness in question. For instance, the age ambit of the ‘child’ can alter from 0-3, 4-6, 7-9 and 10-12 in western culture. Furthermore, the account akin of accouchement is beneath connected scrutiny, as it can be argued that accouchement acquire no ascribe in the conception of the texts that they are accountable to. In his contempo attack to accomplish a alive analogue of this assorted accumulation of texts, Perry Nodelman contends that “defining children’s abstract has been a aloft action of criticism throughout its history”. John Rowe Townsend suggests it is absurd to ascertain children’s abstract as the ascendancy of ‘the child’: “Children’s implies that adolescent bodies own or ascendancy a anatomy of texts that are about written, published, advised and bought by adults”. Townsend additionally suggests desert such definitions. Karin Lesnik-Oberstein asserts that there is a adulterated alignment of accouchement into one accurate class as “children”, with no attention to their individualism.
Oberstein additionally introduces a absurdity aural children’s abstract that denotes: “Children’s abstract again refutes this; claiming that ‘individuality’ is its antecedence aloft all else… This is absolutely the affirmation which cannot be abiding and is debilitated aural the acreage itself… The ‘child’ is an ‘individual’ aural the class of ‘childhood’”. The columnist is suggesting that the arcane apple deems the adolescent as actuality allotment of an free accumulation rather than the adolescent actuality a ‘young adult’ or moreover, a acquainted being. Nodelman observes that although it is difficult to acutely ascertain what is advised children’s literature, it does not beggarly that some texts do not acutely abatement into the category. For instance, archetypal bogie tales such as Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs acquire and consistently will be advised as allotment of the child’s assize of literature, if alone for its all-encompassing history.
In Nodelman’s The Hidden Adult, McDowell presents the accessible defining characteristics that set children’s texts afar from alternative genres of literature. Namely, these characteristics accommodate universality; ‘good over evil’ and moral teachings. Although defining characteristics in children’s texts serves to neatly organise abashed definitions, it is conceivably too brainy and simple an approach. Just because children’s texts acquire “universal structural ancestry and patterns accepted to all children’s literature”; to articulation them is impossible. This access assumes that children’s texts abide agnate at all times and do so aural all cultures. This is absolutely not true. The anticipation of ‘good and evil’ is abstract amidst all cultures. By bond this aesthetics to children’s texts, Shavit is thereby declaring that all tales that argue the western ideal of absoluteness (for example) can’t appropriately be labelled as children’s abstract as differing angle of what is inherently ‘good’ will apparent from adeptness to culture. Thus, it is with the boxed analogue that Shavit and Nodelman active that the analogue of children’s abstract is explained in a actual Eurocentric manner.
Recent definitions of the brand acquire attempted to abstain the generalization of children; although this has accurate acutely difficult because of abreast credo that states plots do not aberrate from the aforementioned basal forms. Children’s abstract is abnormally simplified as a aftereffect of this theory, and conforms to the “binary access that underlies all developed cerebration about accouchement in the centuries in which a ‘special’ abstract has existed. The compassionate of accouchement is bent absolutely in agreement of their action to, abridgement of, and ascendancy to maturity.”
This affirmation of children’s abstract arguably alone serves to average and de-humanise its developed authors, who acquire back become the harbingers of patronising connotations. Throughout the literature’s history, they acquire depicted accouchement as fundamentally incapable, single-minded, vulnerable, and aloft all, absolutely innocent. Adult’s definitions of child-driven narratives acquire appropriately indoctrinated this appearance assimilate their adolescent readers’ minds. The bureaucracy of age is still present, whether or not the absorbed is for the best. In The Hidden Adult, Nodelman proposes:
“In alive to assemble boyhood as a abate and added adequate adaptation of actuality human; a safe home abstracted from the added alarming apple about it, children’s abstract paradoxically closets its boyhood and keeps it a cautiously hidden abstruse that allows for the declared assurance and chastity of the careful anatomy that surrounds it.”
Here Nodelman has acutely accent the difficulties of defining children’s texts. Accomplishing so works alone to alienate accouchement from the absolute ‘adult’ world, he suggests, which after-effects in accouchement actuality advised as absolutely un-educated, delusional and about allegorical in their accompaniment of innocence. Would it not bigger amusement the adolescent to betrayal them to added applied scenarios that they could chronicle to in realityThis will be answered later.
As it stands, children’s abstract is authentic through its bulletin rather than its aesthetic value. However, Marah Gubar has counter-acted this point and argued in Artful Dodgers: Reconceiving the Golden Age of Children’s Abstract that children’s abstract can be “rich in irony, in ambiguity and in linguistic subtlety” and suggests that the essentialism of accouchement tends to attenuated out vision. It should not be abandoned that these texts are still works of literature; and their construction, calm with their command over accent is the cornerstone for their success.
The actuality of the bulk still charcoal that children’s abstract is arguably indefinable, actuality as admitting the adolescent readers themselves do not booty allotment in their architecture at all. One can still allow to altercate and anatomize the genre, however, as it is allotment of the arcane world. In ablaze of this, and in adjustment to analyze children’s texts from alternative texts, it has been abundantly bent that the brand deals with abstract accounting for, or mainly apprehend by, accouchement amid the ages of 1 and 16, in formats and styles alignment from the account book to the adolescent developed novel.
Ideology – “No Argument is Simple”
Children’s abstract is best usually apparent in bifold of “good” for children, or as “bad” for children. Child-centric criticisms usually focus aloft this bifold bisect and attending at what is “good” for the adolescent – in account and in types of texts the adolescent reads. Although this access is adequately out-dated in children’s abstract studies, it is still acclimated by abounding educators and librarians about the world. It is additionally included in the abounding “best of” collections for analysing children’s literature. Keeping in apperception the development of the child, child-centric credo considers this the best important aspect of children’s literature. To added this point, Bruno Bettelheim reinforces the accent of bogie tales in his book The Uses of Enchantment: The Acceptation and Accent of Bogie Tales. Here, Bettelheim asserts that bogie tales are an basic allotment of a child’s development and that they are of the absolute accent in adorning the child’s advance and compassionate of the world. He emphasizes that by ambidextrous “with accepted animal problems, decidedly those which pre-occupy the child’s mind, these belief allege to the child’s beginning ego and animate its development”. Although Bettelheim alone assesses bogie tales, this access of a “moral good” is still a adjustment of judgement acclimated today. Developed readers and parents of adolescent readers will seek out the about adequate bulletin in children’s abstract in adjustment for their accord to be given.
This is acutely problematic, as Jack Zipes credibility out in Additional Thoughts on Socialization Through Abstract for Children. He rejects Bettelheim’s assay of bogie tales and argues that, forth with the blow of children’s literature, the texts are not for children. Instead, Zipes stresses that children’s abstract never belonged to accouchement in the aboriginal place, and that it is in actuality “a calligraphy coded by adults for the advice and internalization of accouchement which charge accommodated the admiration of adults”. In The Hidden Adult, Nodelman agrees that adults abode these belief in adjustment to acclimatize the adolescent arise the adult’s definitions of able behaviour, mannerisms and socialization. Whilst this adeptness assume like angled philosophy, it does accord acumen for the texts to be created; to acclaim the lower-reading akin accepted that is added calmly relatable to accouchement who ambition to absorb themselves in account as a amusement or past-time.
The developed writer-child clairvoyant accord additionally presents addition adjustment of acculturating the child. Nodelmen in The Hidden Developed afford some ablaze on how engrained developed assumptions are in allegedly innocent and simplistic texts:
“Children’s abstract is not simple. The best abecedarian of babyish books comes to abide and has acceptation alone aural a circuitous ambience of assumptions about books, about babies, about books for babies, about accent and beheld imagery, about education, about pleasure, and about the abridgement and the marketplace”.
Regardless then, of complication or aesthetic construct; no anatomy of argument is after ideology. It is inevitable, and a artefact of abreast belief; not to acknowledgment a artefact of what will advertise a adequate bulk of copies in the marketplace, as declared by Nodelman. In Credo and the Children’s Book, Peter Hollindale assumes this position as well, and advocates it is “because of the complication and assortment of both ‘book’ and ‘child’ and of the amusing apple in which anniversary of these alluring abstractions takes a abundance of alone forms”. Hollindale additionally suggests three levels of credo in texts. The aboriginal is formed of “the absolute social, political and moral behavior of the alone biographer and his/her ambition to acclaim them to accouchement throughout the story”. Hollindale believes that this blazon of credo is mostly deliberate, and candidly promotes the bulletin that the biographer wishes to convey. However, Hollindale argues that this is mostly to an black consequence, in which the “ideological accuracy is generally accomplished at the amount of artistic depth”.
The additional class of credo aural children’s texts is the un-examined assumptions and ideologies that the biographer infuses into the work. It is about absurd to confine the brainy or acquiescent ethics of the writer. These ethics will be relocated into the argument and into the all-embracing faculty of the storyline. They are again relayed to the clairvoyant through attenuate and generally benumbed choices of accent and imagery. Furthermore, Hollindale affirms that “un-examined, acquiescent ethics are broadly aggregate values… (and one should not) belittle the admiral of accretion vested in quiescent and benumbed ideology”.
The third class of credo is one that suggests our cerebration “may be afflicted by an over-simplified average of accessible ascendancy and influence…. (and that) writers for accouchement are transmitters not of themselves uniquely, but of the worlds they share.” The fabulous cosmos that is fabricated up for accouchement in their abstract is accordingly a artefact of not alone the alone writer, but of the ethics that were bestowed aloft them back they were a adolescent themselves.
Colonialism of the Child
Jacqueline Rose in The Case of Peter Pan or the Impossibility of Children’s Fiction looks at J.M. Barrie’s Peter Pan in adjustment to present differing interpretations of children’s abstract and asks “what adults, through literature, appetite or appeal of the child,” rather than “what accouchement want, or charge from literature.” Furthermore, she identifies a ambiguous adult-child accord in literature. She explains that children’s abstract arise for accouchement is “a way of colonizing (or wrecking) the child”. Nodelman, in The Hidden Developed argues application agnate accoutrement and relates Edward Said’s Orientalism to the case of accouchement and their literature. The developed is apparent as the colonizer and the adolescent is apparent as the colonized. Peter Hunt (literary critic) reinforces this point by absolute books that are ‘written for’ accouchement are added accepted by their developed counterparts. As a result, the accord amid biographer and clairvoyant seems to be adequately one-sided, as the books again become texts that are accounting by adults, for adults. The child, absolutely notably, is taken out of the account all together, as if they acquire been thoroughly colonized by adults and affected to abound up.
Nodelman explains that ultimately, adults can’t escape the role of the colonizer because they are the alone affair that has the adeptness and anticipation to abode children’s books that will bear the analysis of time. “In adjustment to action colonization, I am advising a benevolent and accessible colonizing attitude arise children”, Nodelman suggested. However, if one is to achieve that no children’s abstract exists that is not colonizing, what does this beggarly for the approaching of children’s booksAre we to artlessly stop autograph books that acquire been apprehend and admired by ancestors of accouchement over centuriesOr is abreast association alone adequate too agitated abroad with amusing practiceOr furthermore; are we too abashed of damaging children’s congenital “innocence” with any pre-mature anticipation of the developed world?
Granted, this abridgement of coercion is beneath arresting in abstract targeted at adolescence, but the types of abstract arise and called to be accent charge additionally be taken into application in that brand as well. In conclusion, it seems that in agreement of authoritative relationships, adults are continuing to arrive accouchement in literature, through an un-avoidable about-face of events.
Post Colonialism – The “Other” and Character in Literature
“Child attitude and children’s abstract can be discussed and analyzed as the accumulated academy for ambidextrous with boyhood – ambidextrous with it by authoritative statements about it, acceding angle of it, anecdotic it, by teaching it, clearing it, cardinal over it; in short, adolescent attitude and children’s abstract as an developed appearance for dominating, restructuring, and accepting ascendancy over childhood.”
This citation demonstrates the absolute colonization of the adolescent through abstract that is aimed alone at them. Whilst this area deals with post-colonization, it is all-important to abode the furnishings that colonization had on the apple in a political and amusing sense. For instance, a bisect was created amid the West and the Orient. Both senses of anniversary culture’s character were molded aural their accustomed territories, as able-bodied as adjoin one another’s accustomed territory. A western adolescent grows up alive that he is a western child, and at the aforementioned time develops ability of the oriental child. Accordingly an character is fabricated to clothing himself, whilst addition adopted character is fabricated to clothing the oriental adolescent in his eyes.
In post-colonial society, the decolonized adolescent develops a post-colonial character that has back stemmed from actuality colonized by their own society. Accouchement are afflicted by the “good and the bad” of the antecedent generations. They are afflicted to apprehend abstracts accustomed to them by their parents – abstracts that the parents themselves acquire accounted aces and adequate of the child’s embrace. Again, there is no accessible allowance for a apple in which colonization does not abide in the parent-child relationship. There is still the role of the colonizer (played by the parent) and the role of the colonized (played by the child). The colonizer’s access is able and un-deniable on the child, abundant like the access that the British Empire had during its administration over India. Clare Bradford exhibits this point able-bodied in her book Unsettling Narratives: Post-Colonial Readings of Children’s Literature, in so far that she observes how boilerplate cultures acquire acclimated and recycled the aforementioned archetypal anecdotal discourses for decades. Clare suggests that this is a bald accretion of colonization, and that the movement is a artefact of accouchement accepting been colonized by their parents for the accomplished of adolescent literature’s history. Bradford has acicular out the assiduity aeon of this activity; and how it will never change because of the accord begin amid the colonizer and the colonized i.e. ancestor and child.
With this casual bottomward of character from colonizer to colonized, the adolescent begins to coin his or her own will to backpack on the generational hierarchy, and indeed, their own will to admit their character from others. Nodelman touches aloft this point actual able-bodied in The Other…, by comparing Orientalism to accepted assumptions about children’s abstract and boyhood itself. His analysis was triggered by Edward Said’s Orientalism, which acts as a annotation about the means the West angle the East. It dictates that by allegory and acceding angle about the Orient, we are additionally assertive and restructuring it, abundant in the aforementioned way as we are assertive and re-structuring boyhood by acceptance adults to abode about it.
Roderick McGillis reinforces this point by application the archetype of cowboys and Indians at the alpha of his book Voices of the Other: Children’s Abstract and the Postcolonial Context. After celebratory how some boys act out the annihilation of 40,000 built-in Indians because their cowboy idols are accomplishing so, he determines that “the success of American adeptness amounts to a colonizing action that these boys arise to acquire readily and unquestioningly.” The aforementioned action that McGillis noticed in these boys happens aural all veins of children’s literature; accouchement are accepting Peter Pan (for instance) after question, and acclamation behavior and universalities abundant in the aforementioned way as their admired advocate does.
In conclusion, it is axiomatic that avant-garde post-colonial association can’t escape the accord it has amid adult-writer and child-reader. It is an ascertainment that could be apparent on the apparent as actuality sinister, but one has to bethink that adults were accouchement already too. Who bigger is there to advise a adolescent how to actDevelopmentally, bodies are creatures of imitation. In this respect, abstract should additionally be accounted as so.
Barrie, J.M. 2013. Peter Pan. UK. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. ISBN-10: 1484102827.
Bettelheim, B. 1991. The Uses of Enchantment: The Acceptation and Accent of Bogie Tales. UK. Penguin Books. ISBN-10: 0140137270.
Bradford, C. 2007. Unsettling Narratives: Postcolonial Readings of Children’s Literature. UK. Wilfrid Laurier University ISBN-10: 0889205078.
Brothers Grimm. 1987. Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. UK. Square Fish. ISBN-10: 0374468680.
Gubar, M. 2010. Artful Dodgers: Reconceiving the Golden Age of Children’s Literature. S. OUP USA. ISBN-10: 0199756742. Pp. 45.
Hollindale, P. 1988. Credo and the Children’s Book. UK. Thimble Press. ISBN-10: 0903355264.
Hunt, P. 1994. An Introduction to Children’s Literature. USA. Oxford University ISBN-10: 0192892436.
Lesnik-Oberstein, K. 2004. Children’s Literature: New Approaches. UK. Palgrave Macmillian. ISBN-10: 1403917388.
2008. The Hidden Adult: Defining Children’s Literature. UK. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN-10: 0801889804. Pp. 188.
McGillis, R. 2012. Voices of the Other: Children’s Abstract and the Postcolonial Ambience (Children’s Abstract and Culture). UK. Routledge, ISBN-10: 0415653150. 14-20, Chp. 43.
McGillis, R. 2000. Voices of the Other. UK. Routledge. ISBN-10: 081533284.
Nodelman, P. 2008. The Hidden Adult: Defining Children’s Literature. UK. Johns Hopkins University ISBN-10: 0801889804. Pp. 163.
Nodelman, P. 1992. The Other: Orientalism, Colonialism and Children’s Literature. Children’s Abstract Association Quarterly. Vol. 17, No. 1. Pp. 29 – 35.
Penguin Accumulation USA. 2013. Accessible: http://www.us.penguingroup.com/static/pages/youngreaders/children/booksbyage.html. Last Accessed 24/10/2013
Rose, J. 1984. The Case of Peter Pan or the Impossibility of Children’s Fiction. S. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN-10: 0812214358.
Said, E. 1979. UK. Vintage. ISBN-10: 039474067X.
Shavit, Z. 2010. Poetics of Children’s Literature. S. University of Georgia Press. ISBN-10: 0820334812.
Townsend, J. R. 1971. Standards of Criticism for Children’s Literature. S. American Library Association. Pp. 194.
Zipes, J. 1981. Additional Thoughts on Socialization Through Abstract for Children. The Lion and the Unicorn Vol. 5. UK. The Johns Hopkins University Pp. 19-32.
Order a unique copy of this paper