Case Study: Mr. C.

Case Study: Mr. C.  It is all-important for an RN-BSN-prepared assistant to authenticate an added compassionate of the pathophysiological processes of disease, the analytic manifestations and analysis protocols, and how they affect audience beyond the action span. Evaluate the Bloom History and Medical Advice for Mr. C., presented below. Based on this information, codify a cessation based on your evaluation, and complete the Critical Thinking Essay assignment, as instructed below. Health History and Medical Information Health History Mr. C., a 32-year-old distinct male, is gluttonous advice at the outpatient centermost apropos accessible bariatric anaplasty for his obesity. He currently works at a archive blast center. He letters that he has consistently been heavy, alike as a baby child, accepting about 100 pounds in the aftermost 2-3 years. Previous medical evaluations accept not adumbrated any metabolic diseases, but he says he has beddy-bye apnea and aerial claret pressure, which he tries to ascendancy by akin comestible sodium. Mr. C. letters accretion conciseness of animation with activity, bloated ankles, and pruritus over the aftermost 6 months. Objective Data: Height: 68 inches; weight 134.5 kg BP: 172/98, HR 88, RR 26 3+ pitting edema mutual anxiety and ankles Fasting claret glucose: 146 mg/dL Total cholesterol: 250 mg/dL Triglycerides: 312 mg/dL HDL: 30 mg/dL Serum creatinine 1.8 mg/dL BUN 32 mg/dl Critical Thinking Essay  In 750-1,000 words, alarmingly appraise Mr. C.'s abeyant analysis and intervention(s). Accommodate the following: Describe the analytic manifestations present in Mr. C. Describe the abeyant bloom risks for blubber that are of affair for Mr. C. Discuss whether bariatric anaplasty is an adapted intervention. Assess anniversary of Mr. C.'s anatomic bloom patterns application the advice given. Discuss at atomic bristles absolute or abeyant problems can you analyze from the anatomic bloom patterns and accommodate the account for each. (Functional bloom patterns accommodate health-perception, health-management, nutritional, metabolic, elimination, activity-exercise, sleep-rest, cognitive-perceptual, self-perception/self-concept, role-relationship, sexuality/reproductive, coping-stress tolerance.) Explain the staging of end-stage renal ache (ESRD) and accidental factors to consider. Consider ESRD blockage and bloom advance opportunities. Describe what blazon of accommodating apprenticeship should be provided to Mr. C. for blockage of approaching events, bloom restoration, and abstention of abasement of renal status. Explain the blazon of assets accessible for ESRD patients for nonacute affliction and the blazon of multidisciplinary access that would be benign for these patients. Accede aspects such as devices, transportation, active conditions, return-to-employment issues. You are adapted to adduce to a minimum of two sources to complete this assignment. Sources charge be appear aural the aftermost 5 years and adapted for the appointment belief and accordant to nursing practice. Prepare this appointment according to the guidelines begin in the APA Appearance Guide, amid in the Student Success Center. An abstruse is not required.  This appointment uses a rubric. Please analysis the account above-mentioned to alpha the appointment to become accustomed with the expectations for acknowledged completion.  You are adapted to abide this appointment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Abutment accessories for assistance.  RUBRIC Attempt Start Date: 30-Sep-2019 at 12:00:00 AM Due Date: 06-Oct-2019 at 11:59:59 PM Maximum Points: 120.0 Case Study: Mr. C. No of Criteria: 11 Achievement Levels: 5CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory0.00 %Less Than Satisfactory75.00 %Satisfactory79.00 %Good89.00 %Excellent100.00 %Content80.0     Clinical Manifestations of Mr. C.10.0Clinical manifestations are omitted.Clinical manifestations are partially presented. There are above omissions and inaccuracies.Clinical manifestations are summarized. An overview of the accepted affection is presented. Some allegation are incomplete.Subjective and cold analytic manifestations are described. Overall, the analytic manifestations are authentic and reflect empiric and perceived signs and symptoms.Subjective and cold analytic manifestations are detailed. The analytic manifestations are authentic and acutely address the empiric and perceived signs and symptoms.Potential Bloom Risks for Blubber and Bariatric Surgery10.0Potential bloom risks for blubber and whether bariatric anaplasty is an adapted action are not discussed.A fractional arbitrary on the abeyant bloom risks for blubber and whether bariatric anaplasty is an adapted action is presented. There are above inaccuracies. Added advice is needed. No affirmation or account is provided to abutment discussion.A arbitrary on the abeyant bloom risks for blubber and whether bariatric anaplasty is an adapted action is presented. There are some inaccuracies. Added affirmation or account is bare to abutment discussion.A altercation on the abeyant bloom risks for blubber is presented. A altercation on whether bariatric anaplasty is an adapted action is presented but needs some affirmation or account for support.A abundant altercation of the abeyant bloom risks for blubber is presented. A through and acute altercation on whether bariatric anaplasty is an adapted action is presented. The altercation is well-developed and authentic by affirmation and added rationale.Functional Bloom Patterns15.0Actual or abeyant problems based on the appraisal of anatomic bloom patterns of the accommodating are bare or are extraneous for the accommodating and his condition. The all-embracing belief for this appointment are not met.At atomic four absolute or abeyant problems articular from the anatomic bloom patterns are presented. The articular problems are not absolutely accordant for the accommodating and his condition. Account or affirmation is adapted for support.At atomic bristles absolute or abeyant problems articular from the anatomic bloom patterns are summarized. The articular problems are about accordant for the accommodating and his condition. Some account and affirmation is adapted for support.Five or added absolute or abeyant problems articular from the anatomic bloom patterns are discussed. The articular problems are accordant for the accommodating and his condition. Overall, the altercation is authentic by account and evidence. Some detail is bare for accurateness or accuracy.Five or added absolute or abeyant problems articular from the anatomic bloom patterns are discussed. The altercation is insightful, and the articular problems are awful accordant for the accommodating and his condition. The altercation is well-supported by account and evidence.Staging and Accidental Factors of End-Stage Renal Ache (ESRD)10.0Staging and accidental factors for ESRD are bare or inaccurate.Staging of ESRD is partially summarized. The accidental factors for ESRD are vague. There are inaccuracies.The staging of ESRD and the accidental factors for ESRD are about explained. Some advice is required; there are accessory inaccuracies.The staging of ESRD and the accidental factors for ESRD are explained. Some advice or detail is bare for accurateness or detail.The staging of ESRD and the accidental factors for ESRD are explained. The advice is authentic and reflects abreast convenance and research.Health Advance and Blockage for ESRD20.0Patient apprenticeship for the blockage of approaching events, bloom restoration, and abstention of abasement of renal cachet is omitted.Patient apprenticeship for the blockage of approaching events, bloom restoration, and abstention of abasement of renal cachet is partially summarized. There are inaccuracies. Some aspects are not accordant for the accommodating and his bloom status.Patient apprenticeship for the blockage of approaching events, bloom restoration, and abstention of abasement of renal cachet is about described. There are accessory inaccuracies. Overall, the proposed items are accordant for the accommodating and his bloom status. Some affirmation and account are bare to abutment the discussion.Patient apprenticeship for the blockage of approaching events, bloom restoration, and abstention of abasement of renal cachet is described. The proposed items are accordant and adapted for the accommodating and his bloom status. Affirmation and account about abutment the discussion.Patient apprenticeship for the blockage of approaching events, bloom restoration, and abstention of abasement of renal cachet is thoroughly described. The proposed items are acutely presented and awful accordant and admiring of accommodating and his bloom status. Strong affirmation and account about abutment the discussion.Resources for ESRD Patients for Nonacute Affliction and Multidisciplinary Approach15.0Types of assets accessible for ESRD patients for nonacute care, and the benign types of multidisciplinary approaches, are not discussed.An abridged account on the types of assets accessible for ESRD patients for nonacute care, and the benign types of multidisciplinary approaches, is presented. There are above inaccuracies.A accepted account on the types of assets accessible for ESRD patients for nonacute care, and the benign types of multidisciplinary approaches, is presented. There are accessory inaccuracies. Some added advice is required.An account on the types of assets accessible for ESRD patients for nonacute care, and the benign types of multidisciplinary approaches, is presented. Some detail is adapted for clarity.A bright and abundant account on the types of assets accessible for ESRD patients for nonacute care, and the benign types of multidisciplinary approaches, is presented. The account demonstrates acumen into both assets and multidisciplinary approaches for nonacute affliction for ESRD patients.Organization, Effectiveness, and Format20.0     Thesis Development and Purpose5.0Paper lacks any aboveboard all-embracing purpose or acclimation claim.Thesis is comparatively developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is aboveboard and adapted to purpose.Thesis is bright and forecasts the development of the paper. Apriorism is anecdotic and cogitating of the arguments and adapted to the purpose.Thesis is absolute and contains the aspect of the paper. Apriorism account makes the purpose of the cardboard clear.Argument Argumentation and Construction5.0Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The cessation does not abutment the affirmation made. Altercation is breathless and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient absolution of claims is lacking. Altercation lacks constant unity. There are accessible flaws in the logic. Some sources accept ambiguous credibility.Argument is alike but may accept a few inconsistencies. The altercation presents basal absolution of claims. Altercation logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources acclimated are credible. Addition and cessation bracket the thesis.Argument shows analytic progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a bland progression of claims from addition to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and acceptable altercation presents a actuating affirmation in a characteristic and acute manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, accent use)5.0Surface errors are common abundant that they impede advice of meaning. Inappropriate chat best or book architecture is used.Frequent and repetitive automated errors abstract the reader. Inconsistencies in accent best (register), book structure, or chat best are present.Some automated errors or typos are present, but they are not ever confusing to the reader. Actual book anatomy and audience-appropriate accent are used.Prose is abundantly chargeless of automated errors, although a few may be present. The biographer uses a array of able book structures and abstracts of speech.Writer is acutely in command of standard, written, bookish English.Paper Architecture (use of adapted appearance for the above and assignment)2.0Template is not acclimated appropriately, or affidavit architecture is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate arrangement is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A abridgement of ascendancy with formatting is apparent.Appropriate arrangement is used. Formatting is correct, although some accessory errors may be present.Appropriate arrangement is absolutely used. There are around no errors in formatting style.All architecture elements are correct.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as adapted to appointment and style)3.0Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as adapted to appointment and style, with abundant formatting errors.Sources are documented, as adapted to appointment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as adapted to appointment and style, and architecture is mostly correct.Sources are absolutely and accurately documented, as adapted to appointment and style, and architecture is chargeless of error.Total Percentage  100

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal
Order now and a get a 25% discount with the discount code: COURSEGUYOrder Now!
+ +