Business Law Short Essay
Respond absolutely to the afterward actuality arrangement and the questions that follow. Identify and altercate the accordant acknowledged and ethical issues presented. You may appetite to do some alfresco reading/ analysis to advice you in formulating your answer. Be abiding to adduce your sources as needed. Your acknowledgment should be about 750 words (2.5 to 3 pages in length). Please use Times New Roman 12 pt. chantry and accepted margins (this makes it easier).
In the Clean Air Act as amended, Congress accustomed California, which has austere problems with air quality, to accept its own standards for emissions from cars and trucks, accountable to the approval of the Environmental Protection Bureau (EPA) according to assertive standards. The Act additionally accustomed alternative states to accept California’s standards afterwards EPA approval.
In 2004, California adopted emissions standards for all new commuter cartage and lightduty trucks awash in California alpha in 2009. The standards imposed abbreviating banned on emissions of carbon dioxide and alternative greenhouse gases (GHG) through 2016.
While EPA approval was pending, alternative states adopted the California standards. A accumulation of industry associations, automakers, and new car dealerships filed clothing to block accompaniment acceptance of the standards (including California).
(a) Under the Environmental Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), a appointed federal bureau sets ammunition abridgement standards for new cars. The plaintiffs argued, amid alternative things, that the EPCA, which absolutely prohibits states from adopting abstracted ammunition abridgement standards, preempts states from adopting their own discharge standards. Is the plaintiffs’ altercation valid? Discuss.
(b) Do the accompaniment emissions rules appoint on the efforts of the federal government to abode all-around abating internationally? Who should adapt GHGs, the states or the federal government? Both? Neither? Discuss.
(c) The plaintiffs additionally argued that they would go broke if they were affected to attach to a altered GHG accepted for anniversary state. Should they be accepted abatement on this basis? Does history abutment their claim? Discuss.
This is a Business Law course! I am not decidedly absorbed in account treatises on libertarianism or environmentalism – I appetite you to anticipate alarmingly about the trade-offs amid business and the environment, and animadversion on the acknowledged and ethical issues that are presented above.
Order a unique copy of this paper