Ben and Biff’s
In Arthur Miller’s play, Death of a Salesman, the appearance Biff is the son of Willy Loman, the protagonist. The appearance Ben is Willy’s brother. They are actual altered but they allotment some similarities. Biff is real, in the faculty that he appears in the comedy in the present, while Ben is a aberration and a artefact of Willy’s delusions, actualization in an alternating time-line. Biff is Willy’s achievement for the approaching and a attribute of his own absent hopes and dreams. Ben is a apotheosis of success and a accepted for which Willy strives.
Barron’s Booknotes says of Ben, “From the moment we see Ben he turns out to be a awful arcadian figure, for Willy’s anamnesis turns him into a god,” (Miller, Williams, Paul 1984 p 21). Both characters added the artifice but Ben is added absolutely a articulate accessory that helps to drive the comedy by acceptance the admirers a glimpse central the apperception of Willy Loman in a way that would be difficult otherwise. Both Biff and Ben are accomplished at demography Willy’s apperception off his own problems.
He goes into a array of aberrant abstraction and speaks to both characters back he is troubled. Sometimes these conversations are rehashes of conversations accomplished and sometimes they are conversations agitated on as Willy wishes they had been. Willy remembers conversations with his brother that never happened. He believes that his brother is the success that he is not and the success that he wants his son to be so he wants Ben to explain the secrets of authoritative a fortune.
Both Ben and Biff are amoral and accept around no amusing values. Biff is accommodating to abduct and goes out of his way to booty a pen as a array of bays to appearance he is above to addition to whom he absolutely is subservient. Ben knocks bottomward his nephew Biff in a action and again tells him that is ok to bluff and do annihilation all-important to win adjoin a stranger. “Ben, patting Biff’s knee: Never action fair with a stranger, boy. You’ll never get out of the boscage that way,” (Act I p 49).
Biff’s mother does not like this admonition but Biff acutely believes that it is a acceptable adage to alive by. His father, Willy, again instructs him to abduct actual from a architecture site. Biff and Ben both assume to anticipate that the end justifies whatever agency is acclimated to accomplish their goals. Ben shows that he is appreciative of Biff for actuality a thief. He praises Biff for accepting the adventuresomeness to abduct from the architecture site, assuming he is not afraid. Biff comes to apprehend his ancestor is a abortion at activity and his abstraction of how to accomplish dreams is not logical.
Biff is added like his Uncle Ben, who treats him as the being he absolutely is and not like the angel that he wants to create, as his ancestor does, active on absurd accomplished glory. The characters of Biff and Ben are acclimated by Miller to acquiesce Willy to aperture his acerbity and frustration. They both accord Willy Loman an befalling to abode the audience. It shows he is accident his butt of reality, of course, but added so, it gives Miller the befalling to beforehand the capacity of the comedy in a absolute way. He is not ‘dime-a-dozen’, he is Willy Loman, Miller has him say.
Ben and Biff both say things to Willy that makes Linda, his wife, try to assure him. “Linda, abashed of Ben and affronted at him: Don’ t say those things to him. (He is doing) able-bodied abundant to be blessed appropriate here. Appropriate now,” (Act II p 8). They say things that she doesn’t appetite Willy to accept to accord with. Both Ben and Biff are characters that accept a abutting accord with Willy alike admitting Willy doesn’t absolutely apperceive either of them. He is absent in his own world. Ben is added the realist than is Willy. He is a man who does not alive in the past.
He grabs what he wants and makes it his own. Biff at aftermost loses his rose-colored glasses and accepts his uncle’s appearance of the life. He sees that he is added like his uncle than he accomplished and that he is annihilation like his father. He at aftermost understands that his ancestor is a also-ran and a tragedy. References Miller, A. , Weales, G. Death of a Salesman New York: Penguin Group 1977 Miller, A. , Williams, L. and Paul, K. Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman (Barron’s Booknotes) Hauppauge, N. Y. : Barron’s Educational Series, Inc. Copyright 1984
Order a unique copy of this paper