ASSIGMENT

THIS IS THE CORRECT ASSIGNMENT, THE ONE POSTED IT IS WRONG. I ALSO SENT VIA EMAIL 2 ATTACHMENTS FOR YOU TO WORK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT. EVERYTHING HAS TO BE RELATED. THE TOPIC IS SMOKING.

Note: This is an alone assignment. In 1,500-2,000 words, call the teaching acquaintance and altercate your observations. The accounting allocation of this appointment should include:

  1. Summary of teaching plan
  2. Epidemiological account for topic
  3. Evaluation of teaching experience
  4. Community acknowledgment to teaching
  5. Areas of strengths and areas of improvement

Prepare this appointment according to the APA guidelines begin in the APA Appearance Guide, amid in the Student Success Center. An abstruse is not required.

This appointment uses a rubric. Please analysis the account above-mentioned to alpha the appointment to become accustomed with the expectations for acknowledged completion.

RUBRICS

Unsatisfactory
0.00%

 2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content 
30.0 % Comprehensive Arbitrary of Teaching Plan With Epidemiological Account for TopicSummary of association teaching plan is not articular or missing.Summary of association teaching plan is incomplete.Summary of association teaching plan is offered but some elements are vague.Focus of association teaching is bright with a abundant arbitrary of anniversary component. Account is not provided.Focus of association teaching is clear, constant with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) appraisal allegation and accurate by account of epidemiological rationale.
50.0 % Evaluation of Teaching Acquaintance With Altercation of Association Acknowledgment to Teaching Provided. Areas of Strength and Areas of Improvement DescribedEvaluation of teaching acquaintance is bare or incomplete.Evaluation of teaching acquaintance is cryptic and/or altercation of association acknowledgment to teaching is missing.Evaluation of teaching acquaintance is provided with a abrupt altercation of association acknowledgment to teaching.A abundant appraisal of teaching acquaintance with altercation of association acknowledgment to teaching and areas of strength/improvement is provided.Comprehensive appraisal of teaching acquaintance with altercation of association acknowledgment provided forth with a abundant description of barriers and strategies to affected barriers is provided.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 
5.0 % Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any credible all-embracing purpose or acclimation claim.Thesis is comparatively developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis is credible and adapted to purpose.Thesis is bright and forecasts the development of the paper. It is anecdotic and cogitating of the arguments and adapted to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive; independent aural the apriorism is the aspect of the paper. Apriorism account makes the purpose of the cardboard clear.
5.0 % Paragraph Development and TransitionsParagraphs and transitions consistently abridgement accord and coherence. No credible access amid paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Alignment is disjointed.Some paragraphs and transitions may abridgement analytic progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some amount of alignment is evident.Paragraphs are about competent, but account may appearance some aberration in alignment and/or in their relationships to anniversary other.A analytic progression of account amid paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs display a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and absolute animadversion are adapted to purpose.There is a adult architecture of paragraphs and transitions. Account advance and chronicle to anniversary other. Paragraph and alteration architecture adviser the reader. Paragraph anatomy is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, accent use)Surface errors are common abundant that they impede advice of meaning. Inappropriate chat best and/or book architecture are used.Frequent and repetitive automated errors abstract the reader. Inconsistencies in accent best (register), book structure, and/or chat best are present.Some automated errors or typos are present, but are not ever confusing to the reader. Actual book anatomy and audience-appropriate accent are used.Prose is abundantly chargeless of automated errors, although a few may be present. A array of book structures and able abstracts of accent are used.Writer is acutely in command of standard, written, bookish English.
5.0 %Format 
2.0 % Paper FormatTemplate is not acclimated appropriately or affidavit architecture is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; abridgement of ascendancy with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some accessory errors may be present.Template is absolutely used; There are around no errors in formatting style.All architecture elements are correct.
3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for apery and absolute quotes, and advertence folio advertisement and formatting, as adapted to assignment)No advertence folio is included. No citations are used.Reference folio is present. Citations are inconsistently used.Reference folio is included and lists sources acclimated in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.Reference folio is present and absolutely across-the-board of all cited sources. Affidavit is adapted and appearance adviser is usually correct.In-text citations and a advertence folio are complete. The affidavit of cited sources is chargeless of error.
100 % Total Weightage 

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal
Order now and a get a 25% discount with the discount code: COURSEGUYOrder Now!
+ +