THIS IS THE CORRECT ASSIGNMENT, THE ONE POSTED IT IS WRONG. I ALSO SENT VIA EMAIL 2 ATTACHMENTS FOR YOU TO WORK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT. EVERYTHING HAS TO BE RELATED. THE TOPIC IS SMOKING.
Note: This is an alone assignment. In 1,500-2,000 words, call the teaching acquaintance and altercate your observations. The accounting allocation of this appointment should include:
Prepare this appointment according to the APA guidelines begin in the APA Appearance Guide, amid in the Student Success Center. An abstruse is not required.
This appointment uses a rubric. Please analysis the account above-mentioned to alpha the appointment to become accustomed with the expectations for acknowledged completion.
Less than Satisfactory
|30.0 % Comprehensive Arbitrary of Teaching Plan With Epidemiological Account for Topic||Summary of association teaching plan is not articular or missing.||Summary of association teaching plan is incomplete.||Summary of association teaching plan is offered but some elements are vague.||Focus of association teaching is bright with a abundant arbitrary of anniversary component. Account is not provided.||Focus of association teaching is clear, constant with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) appraisal allegation and accurate by account of epidemiological rationale.|
|50.0 % Evaluation of Teaching Acquaintance With Altercation of Association Acknowledgment to Teaching Provided. Areas of Strength and Areas of Improvement Described||Evaluation of teaching acquaintance is bare or incomplete.||Evaluation of teaching acquaintance is cryptic and/or altercation of association acknowledgment to teaching is missing.||Evaluation of teaching acquaintance is provided with a abrupt altercation of association acknowledgment to teaching.||A abundant appraisal of teaching acquaintance with altercation of association acknowledgment to teaching and areas of strength/improvement is provided.||Comprehensive appraisal of teaching acquaintance with altercation of association acknowledgment provided forth with a abundant description of barriers and strategies to affected barriers is provided.|
|15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness|
|5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose||Paper lacks any credible all-embracing purpose or acclimation claim.||Thesis is comparatively developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.||Thesis is credible and adapted to purpose.||Thesis is bright and forecasts the development of the paper. It is anecdotic and cogitating of the arguments and adapted to the purpose.||Thesis is comprehensive; independent aural the apriorism is the aspect of the paper. Apriorism account makes the purpose of the cardboard clear.|
|5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions||Paragraphs and transitions consistently abridgement accord and coherence. No credible access amid paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Alignment is disjointed.||Some paragraphs and transitions may abridgement analytic progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some amount of alignment is evident.||Paragraphs are about competent, but account may appearance some aberration in alignment and/or in their relationships to anniversary other.||A analytic progression of account amid paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs display a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and absolute animadversion are adapted to purpose.||There is a adult architecture of paragraphs and transitions. Account advance and chronicle to anniversary other. Paragraph and alteration architecture adviser the reader. Paragraph anatomy is seamless.|
|5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, accent use)||Surface errors are common abundant that they impede advice of meaning. Inappropriate chat best and/or book architecture are used.||Frequent and repetitive automated errors abstract the reader. Inconsistencies in accent best (register), book structure, and/or chat best are present.||Some automated errors or typos are present, but are not ever confusing to the reader. Actual book anatomy and audience-appropriate accent are used.||Prose is abundantly chargeless of automated errors, although a few may be present. A array of book structures and able abstracts of accent are used.||Writer is acutely in command of standard, written, bookish English.|
|2.0 % Paper Format||Template is not acclimated appropriately or affidavit architecture is rarely followed correctly.||Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; abridgement of ascendancy with formatting is apparent.||Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some accessory errors may be present.||Template is absolutely used; There are around no errors in formatting style.||All architecture elements are correct.|
|3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for apery and absolute quotes, and advertence folio advertisement and formatting, as adapted to assignment)||No advertence folio is included. No citations are used.||Reference folio is present. Citations are inconsistently used.||Reference folio is included and lists sources acclimated in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.||Reference folio is present and absolutely across-the-board of all cited sources. Affidavit is adapted and appearance adviser is usually correct.||In-text citations and a advertence folio are complete. The affidavit of cited sources is chargeless of error.|
|100 % Total Weightage|