Analyze the Cognitive Dissonance Essay

Cognitive antagonism is an abhorrence amid two or added attitudes or amid a behavior and attitude. It is an afflictive action acquired by captivation conflicting ideas simultaneously. In a accompaniment of dissonance, bodies may feel surprise, dread, guilt, anger, or embarrassment. Bodies are biased to anticipate of their choices as correct, admitting any adverse evidence. This bent gives antagonism approach its predictive power, address ablaze on contrarily abstruse aberrant and annihilative behavior. They do this by alteration their attitudes, beliefs, and actions. Antagonism is additionally bargain by justifying, blaming, and denying.The approach of cerebral antagonism proposes that bodies accept a motivational drive to abate antagonism Archetype of Cerebral Antagonism SMOKING Smoker is about accustomed as an archetype of cerebral antagonism because it is broadly accustomed that cigarettes can annual lung cancer, yet about anybody wants to alive a continued and advantageous life. In agreement of the theory, the admiration to alive a continued action is anomalous with the action of accomplishing article that will best acceptable abbreviate one's life. The astriction produced by these adverse annual can be bargain by abandonment smoking, abstinent the affirmation of lung cancer, or answer one's smoking.For example, smokers could rationalize their behavior by absolute that abandoned a few smokers become ill, that it abandoned happens to actual abundant smokers, or that if smoker does not annihilate them, article abroad will. While actinic addiction may accomplish in accession to cerebral antagonism for absolute smokers, new smokers may display a simpler case of the latter. The best acclaimed case in the aboriginal abstraction of cerebral antagonism was declared by Leon Festinger and others in the book When Apocalypse Fails. This book gave an axial annual of the accretion acceptance which sometimes follows the abortion of a cult's prophecy.The believers met at a pre-determined abode and time, assertive they abandoned would survive the Earth's destruction. The appointed time came and anesthetized afterwards incident. They faced astute cerebral dissonance: had they been the victim of a hoax? Had they donated their carnal backing in vain? Best associates chose to accept article beneath dissonant: the aliens had accustomed apple a additional chance, and the accumulation was now empowered to beforehand the word: earth-spoiling charge stop. The accumulation badly added their proselytism admitting the bootless prophecy. Approach and ResearchImportant analysis generated by the approach has been anxious with the after-effects of acknowledgment to advice inconsistent with a above-mentioned belief, what happens afterwards individuals act in means that are inconsistent with their above-mentioned attitudes, what happens afterwards individuals accomplish decisions, and the furnishings of accomplishment expenditure. Based on the abstracts Cerebral Antagonism can be classified into 4 categories: 1) Insufficient Absolution - Festinger and Carlsmith (1959) In Festinger and Carlsmith’s archetypal 1959 experiment, acceptance were asked to absorb an hour on arid and annoying tasks (e. . , axis pegs a division turn, over and over again). The tasks were advised to accomplish a strong, abrogating attitude. Already the capacity had done this, the experimenters asked some of them to do a simple favor. They were asked to allocution to accession accountable and actuate them that the tasks were absorbing and engaging. Some participants were paid $20 (inflation adapted to 2010, this equates to $150) for this favor, accession accumulation was paid $1 (or $7. 50 in "2010 dollars"), and a ascendancy accumulation was not asked to accomplish the favor.When asked to bulk the arid tasks at the cessation of the abstraction (not in the attendance of the addition "subject"), those in the $1 accumulation rated them added actually than those in the $20 and ascendancy groups. This was explained by Festinger and Carlsmith as affirmation for cerebral dissonance. The advisers theorized that bodies accomplished antagonism amid the adverse cognitions, "I told accession that the assignment was interesting", and "I actually begin it boring. " Back paid abandoned $1, acceptance were affected to internalize the attitude they were induced to express, because they had no addition justification.Those in the $20 condition, however, had an accessible alien absolution for their behavior, and appropriately accomplished beneath dissonance. 2) Insufficient Deterrence/Punishment - Aronson and Carlsmith (1963) This agreement examined self-justification in children. In this experiment, accouchement were larboard in a allowance with a array of toys, including a awful adorable toy steam-shovel (or addition toy). Upon abrogation the room, the experimenter told bisected the accouchement that there would be a astringent abuse if they played with that accurate toy and told the addition bisected that there would be a balmy punishment.All the accouchement in the abstraction refrained from arena with the toy. Later, back the accouchement were told that they could advisedly comedy with whatever toy they wanted, the ones in the balmy abuse action were beneath acceptable to comedy with the toy, alike admitting the blackmail had been removed. The accouchement who were abandoned agilely threatened had to absolve to themselves why they did not comedy with the toy. The bulk of abuse by itself was not able enough, so the accouchement had to argue themselves that the toy was not account arena with in adjustment to boldness their dissonance. 3) Answer Difficult Decisions (Post decisional Dissonance) - Brehm (1956)Brehm (1956) looked into the after-effects of authoritative a best in post-decision dissonance. Participants in Brehm’s agreement rated several altar on agreeableness (Brehm 1956). The experimenters manipulated the akin of antagonism by accepting participants accept amid two altar either abutting or abroad in rated desirability. Afterwards participants chose an article and apprehend anomalous or accordant advice about the two objects, they had to re-rate the objects. After-effects showed that participants re-ranked the called article as added adorable and abandoned the abrogating information.When antagonism was aerial (objects carefully rated), participants had to absolve their best of article added than those who had to accept amid altar not carefully rated by re-evaluating the article as added adorable than their antecedent impression. 4) Absolution of Accomplishment - Aronson and Mills (1959) Antagonism is angry whenever individuals voluntarily appoint in an abhorrent action to accomplish some adapted goal. Antagonism can be bargain by exaggerating the agreeableness of the goal. Aronson and Mills advised antagonism application an accomplishment absolution paradigm.Female participants, who were abutting a altercation group, were accustomed into the accumulation (control condition), had to go through a balmy admission or had to go through a astringent initiation. Back the participants were afterwards asked the bulk the altercation and the accumulation members, those who went through astringent admission rated both categories abundant college than both the ascendancy and balmy admission groups. Because the changeable participants had to absolve the accomplishment and abasement they accomplished to access the group, they rated the accumulation as added adorable than the addition conditions.Cognitive Antagonism - Driving the Accretion of Charge One of the factors that drive the accretion of charge is cognitive dissonance. Cerebral antagonism is a accompaniment of astriction that occurs whenever a actuality accompanying holds adverse annual or beliefs. Because captivation two adverse annual or behavior creates an abhorrent tension, bodies are artlessly motivated to abate it. Antagonism abbreviation behaviour is ego-defensive; by abbreviation dissonance, a actuality gets to beforehand their absolute self-image; an angel that depicts them as a acceptable or acute person.Cognitive antagonism about produces behaviour that is allegedly irrational; although, to the person, it may assume actual sensible. Compassionate and leveraging cerebral antagonism is a able apparatus for designing chump or agent adventures that actually access a person’s cerebration and behaviour and drive the accretion of commitment: * Absolution and Filtering. Afterward a decision, abnormally either a difficult one or one that involves a cogent bulk of time, effort, or money, barter about consistently acquaintance dissonance.Did they do the appropriate thing? The called addition is hardly actually positive, and the alone alternatives including the “do annihilation alternative” are hardly actually negative. Afterwards a cogent decision, barter about seek accretion that their decisions were acceptable ones by gluttonous advice that is reassuring. If at all possible, they try to argue themselves and others that it was a analytic and reasonable affair to do. They abstain cerebration about either the abrogating aspects of the best they’ve fabricated or the absolute aspects of the un-chosen alternatives.In designing chump or agent experiences, it is important to arm barter with the adventure they’ll acquaint themselves and others. In abounding cases, it makes faculty to continue marketing afterwards the sale in a way that provides bodies with the armament they charge to absolve the accommodation they’ve made. * Responsibility: Antagonism furnishings are greatest back (1) bodies feel alone amenable for their accomplishments and (2) their accomplishments accept austere consequences. If there is a cogent bulk of alien accretion or incentives, we may not “own” the decision.For example, alms rewards to individuals for assuming alike the best affable activities decreases the built-in bulk of those activities and reduces the individual’s albatross for accepting done it. This is why “incentive programs” not abandoned don’t body abiding behavior, but may attenuate it in some cases. * Consistency and Escalation: In the absence of able adverse signals, antagonism abridgement will reinforce accomplishments constant with beforehand commitments and behavior. In addition, already a baby charge is made, it sets the date for ever-increasing commitments.The behavior needs to be justified, so attitudes are changed; this change in attitudes influences approaching decisions and behavior. Back barter accomplish themselves in a baby way, the likelihood they will accomplish themselves added in that administration is increased. This action of application baby commitments to animate bodies to accept to above commitments has been dubbed the “foot in the door” technique. It is able because accepting done the abate favor sets up pressures against accordant to do the above favor; in effect, it provides absolution in beforehand for acknowledging with the ample requests. Certitude and Inevitability: Two of the best important characteristics that aftereffect cerebral antagonism are the about certitude and authoritativeness of the decision. Assertive decisions consistently access not abandoned the antagonism but the action to abate it. Already we’ve committed ourselves to an assertive advance of action, it’s in our best interests to absolve the accommodation we fabricated and abstain adverse information. In addition, analysis shows that a person’s antagonism is bargain with choices they see as inevitable. In summary, designing affecting adventures requires an compassionate of cerebral antagonism and, in particular, how cerebral antagonism drives the accretion of commitment. Cerebral antagonism in the abode Each agent arrives with a set of values, attitudes, and expectations. These accommodate both the assignment to be done and the organization. The alone confronts the accessible dichotomy amid expectations--- about the job, the coworkers, the boss, and the alignment in general---and reality.He adventures cerebral antagonism A actuality who can handle one bearings able-bodied but not accession tends to acquaintance ache from cerebral dissonance. Ex-A actuality adeptness be awfully acceptable at interpersonal abilities but attempt with finance. There are several means in which an admirable agent can abatement victim to bigotry in the workplace. The agent is assassin by an balanced administrator and does able-bodied in that manager’s administration for abounding years. Afresh the agent gets a new bang-up who does not apperceive annihilation about the advisers accomplished performance. He is aback advised as yet accession “average employee”.The agent does acquaintance cerebral dissonance. There is additionally a action of antagonism back a acceptable agent is laid off because of affidavit above his control, like back a aggregation is downsizing, and his role is no best required. Prejudice is additionally a anatomy of cerebral antagonism because bodies who authority biased angle about charge accord with affirmation that does not bout with their views. Majority of men still accept a botheration advertence women with accounts admitting some of the top banking positions are captivated by women. A acute actuality with a arid job (a adequately archetypal job) suffers from cerebral dissonance.If there is no best but to abide the job, due to money needs or a acrid labour market, added antagonism rises. One bearings in which cerebral antagonism can action is back a actuality changes roles such as back a branch artisan gets answer to foreperson. The behavior appropriate in this new role including giving orders, instead of accepting may be at allowance with the opinions and belief that the alone captivated as a low-level worker. The consistent cerebral antagonism about after-effects in an individual’s opinions advancing in band with the addition supervisors.Another bearings that can actualize cerebral antagonism is back a actuality completes a advance of conduct that does not end up actuality account the cede and backbone that the conduct required. Ex-A actuality who gets his dream job and afresh realizes that his success is not account the cede of his health, sleep, or time for ancestors or addition amusing endeavors. Mergers and acquisitions are actual ambitious to the advisers abnormally to the advisers of the acquired firm. They feel threatened that they adeptness lose their jobs, cachet or influence. Depending on the accumulation of employees, altered arresting choices assume added likely.Top managers abstain cerebral antagonism by abrogation the company. The advisers abate cerebral antagonism by alteration their behavior and attitudes or by artlessly afraid and abstinent changes. Akerlof and Dickens archetypal Akerlof and Dickens (1982) developed a archetypal of a chancy industry labour bazaar area workers and firms apperceive the accurate allowance of accident, but workers are decumbent to acquaintance cerebral antagonism reaction. Because of cerebral dissonance, alive the allowance imposes analytic costs of abhorrence and beneath assertive conditions, it will be able to abolish abhorrence and accept an alternating set of behavior added accordant with preferences, e. . , the allowance of blow are lower. The capital point of the archetypal was to appearance that back bodies anatomy such cerebral antagonism reactions, government action such as assurance legislation, area workers charge acquirement assurance legislations, may be bare to restore Pareto optimality. WAYS TO REDUCE COGNITIVE DISSONANCE Antagonism will be bound in one of three basal ways: Change beliefs: Perhaps the simplest way to boldness antagonism amid accomplishments and behavior is artlessly to change your beliefs. You could, of course, aloof adjudge that cheating is o. k. This would booty affliction of any dissonance. However, if the acceptance is axiological and important to you such a advance of action is unlikely. Moreover, our basal behavior and attitudes are appealing stable, and bodies don’t aloof go about alteration basal beliefs/attitudes/opinions all the time, back we await a lot on our apple appearance in admiration contest and acclimation our thoughts. Therefore, admitting this is the simplest advantage for absolute antagonism it’s apparently not the best common. Change actions: A additional advantage would be to accomplish abiding that you never do this action again. Lord knows that answerability and all-overs can be motivators for alteration behavior.So, you may say to yourself that you will never bluff on a analysis again, and this may aid in absolute the dissonance. However, aloof conditioning (i. e. , guilt/anxiety) can about be a appealing poor way of learning, abnormally if you can alternation yourself not to feel these things. Plus, you may actually account in some way from the action that’s inconsistent with your beliefs. So, the ambush would be to get rid of this action afterwards alteration your behavior or your actions, and this leads us to the third, and apparently best common, adjustment of resolution.Change acumen of action: A third and added circuitous adjustment of resolution is to change the way you view/remember/perceive your action. In added chatty terms, you would "rationalize" your actions. For example, you adeptness adjudge that the analysis you cheated on was for a impaired chic that you didn’t charge anyway. Or you may say to yourself that anybody cheats so why not you? In addition words, you anticipate about your action in a altered address or ambience so that it no best appears to be inconsistent with your beliefs.If you reflect on this alternation of brainy gymnastics for a moment you will apparently admit why cerebral antagonism has appear to be so popular. If you’re like me, you apprehension such post-hoc re conceptualizations (rationalizations) of behavior on the allotment of others all the time, admitting it’s not so accepted to see it in one’s self. HOW CAN A MANAGER/ORGANIZATION HELP REDUCE COGNITIVE DISSONANCE The administrator or an alignment can advice and abate an employee’s cerebral antagonism in the afterward manner: 1. The assignment in a adeptness industry is actual demanding, physically as able-bodied as mentally. One has to be active and put in continued hours of work.Thus preventing antagonism is acutely important in projects area bodies assignment beneath abundant stress. It was acclaimed by Festinger that bodies abstain advice that is acceptable to annual dissonance. Bodies tend to adhere out with others of “their kind”. If an alone does not accept an befalling to mix with addition of his kind, he gets breach in the alignment appealing anon and is on the way out. Appropriately it is an acutely advantageous convenance to adapt article like a “Birds of a Feather” event. Such contest organized based on able and added curricular interest’s builds brotherhood amidst the group. . Often, bodies tend to discount their baby time bent behavior during the advance of work. Such adeptness not bulk to calmness of bribery or fraud, but, about creates a bad adeptness in the aggregation from an belief standpoint. Specifically, in case of an IT company, the HR empiric that some of their advisers were appointment bills that were incorrect or fake. Implementing a analysis for every bill submitted would aftereffect in a colossal decay of time for the alignment and adjournment in application employee’s reimbursement. Appropriately to actualize dissonance, the HR aggregation went on a attack to actualize awareness.The attack not abandoned created acquaintance but, additionally antagonism in the minds of the advisers who were appointment apocryphal claims. Thus, they acclimated cerebral antagonism finer as a deterrent. 3. Back an alone does not allotment the aforementioned drive to act as the blow of the accumulation yet accumulation norms beset acquiescence with accumulation action, cerebral antagonism occurs. It creates a abrogating drive accompaniment that charge be resolved. An emotionally able aggregation has the adeptness to become acquainted of this astriction and advice the affiliate boldness the antagonism in the way that builds, or at atomic does not deplete, assurance or faculty of belonging. . A acceptable acclimatization affairs can accommodate a carefully-selected associate who should finer accept some commonality with the new agent to advice the new agent acclimatize and digest into the new environment. 5. Aerial rewards accompanying aerial antagonism tend to abate the astriction inherent in the dissonance. 6. To accomplish reviews an able apparatus for convalescent performance, we charge to accept and administer some basal attempt of psychology. Bodies are internally apprenticed to do the best that they can be based on their acumen and compassionate of what is expected.These expectations abide in the hidden apperception and are afflicted by what the actuality has experienced. The hidden cannot accord in abstruse concepts. So reviews charge to focus on specific, accurate accomplishments and behaviors that access either absolute or abrogating performance. While barometer key factors associated with achievement is actually capital to active a business, absorption on numbers is a abortive action back it comes to convalescent alone performance. 7. Accession way to affected cerebral antagonism is for the administrator to ask rather than tell. Accept the advisers evaluated their own performance.The administrator asks questions to analyze what is actuality said. Hence, it will advice the agent anticipate about his/her performance, yet at the aforementioned time, he/she will feel that the administrator is not anticipation or evaluating him/her. 8. The aforementioned assumption applies back ambience goals. Back advisers advance their own objectives, cerebral antagonism disappears. If a administrator says “Here are your goals for the year”, the agent anon thinks “How can anyone be accepted to do all that”. Instead of activity to assignment on the goal, the hidden focuses on the aisle of atomic attrition which is rationalization, blame, or indifference.Whether its achievement evaluation, development plans, or objectives, it’s still the manager’s advantage to adjudge if they are adequate. Not abandoned does this advantage the way the apperception works, it’s a abundant easier and beneath ambitious way to manage. The albatross for managing achievement is placed area it belongs — on the employee. The administrator is no best the driver, but the coach. Cerebral antagonism appears in about all evaluations and decisions and is the axial apparatus by which we acquaintance new differences in the world. Thus, it is acutely important for an alone as able-bodied as an alignment to put efforts to boldness it.

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal