Analysis of Ancient Roman Architecture

Ancient Rome is able-bodied recognised for its abeyant to aftermath large, close and circuitous arrangement of basement alignment from roads, aqueducts, bridges, baths, and temples. The Romans were absorbing builders and some of the structures congenital by the Romans that still angle up to this day display this. Ample basement was one of the axiological aspects that accustomed the Roman Authority to beforehand its all-embracing territory; anchorage acceptance the chargeless movement of goods, advice and troops, the sewers and freshwater systems enabling the beforehand of ample populations. Thus, with these benefits, the Roman authority began to curl and sparked a aureate age of abstruse beforehand and architectural development.

Under the Roman empire, burghal development followed the filigree plan based framework adopted from backward Greek cities of the Hellenistic period. Roman cities had two above roads, the Cardo Maximus, the capital artery active through the north-south and the Decumanus, active east-west, confined as a accessory street, emphasised in the age-old Roman burghal of Timgad (figure 1), which was a accepted aspect of Roman cities. In essence, the Cardo Maximus and Decumanus played an basic allotment of burghal planning, but additionally served as a axial hub for bread-and-butter activity and business.

C:UsersZakariya MoussaAppDataLocalMicrosoftWindowsINetCacheContent.Word4361584827_bc0bf7e16f_z.jpg

Figure 1: The burghal of Timgad in Algeria (Marten Kuilman 2010)

Furthermore, the Roman grid-based burghal plan transitioned appear an burghal plan by the aboriginal aeon B.C.E. However, it was not planned absolutely in beforehand during the development of Rome. On the another hand, by superseding grid-based plan, an burghal plan was a added adjustable band-aid consistent in a added busy and amoebic ‘plan’ that accustomed Rome to expand, advance and abound in splendour (Evans, 2017, p.24-5).

Thus theatres, accessible buildings, basilicas, temples, libraries, and amphitheatres were brindled all beyond the burghal bolt of the burghal so that every architectonics was amidst by a accessible anatomy (Kostof, 1991, p.214).

Albeit, Rome did ache from burghal issues, best of which was the gap amid the affluent and poor. The all-inclusive majority of Roman citizens were poor and lived in multi-storey flats or apartments accepted as Insulae (figure 2), which were simplistic barrio that alone provided at best a best of 2 apartment with no calm plumbing; therefore, the poor had to drive to accessible baths to get a accumulation of water.

Figure 2: Remains of a insula in the Capitol hill, in Rome (II aeon a. C.) (Peter Collony and Hazel contrivance 1998)

On the another hand, the affluent lived in distinct storey clandestine houses alleged Domus, consisting of assorted rooms, abundantly laid out walls, area and courtyards surrounding the atrium (figure 3) which was the ample axial anteroom of the Domus.


Figure 3: A Pompeian Interior oil on console Dahesh Museum of Art (Luigi Bazzani 1882)

The Roman appointment was an ellipsoidal amplitude acclimatized from the Greek agora, amid abreast the circle of the Cardo Maximus and Decumanus admitting the theatre and amphitheatre were amid at the ambit of the city, captivated about by adherent burghal walls. The appointment was mainly composed of accessible barrio such as baths, temples of worship, borough centres and authoritative buildings, amid by colonnades and either a boondocks anteroom or a basilica. This was because of the Roman ability to enclose accessible buildings, for example, the classical Greek theatre’s change that initially began as an accessible anatomy (figure 4), however, it was bigger aloft by the Romans into an amid theatre (figure 5) through the aggregate of the amphitheater and date (Wheeler, 1964, pp.111-2).

Figure 4: Greek theatre (Twinningblog 2008)

Figure 5: Greek theatre (Twinningblog 2008)

Public barrio were adorned with sculptures, paintings, and fountains that were acclimated as a antecedent of borough pride for the Roman public. As a result, the appointment became the focal point of business, amusing actuality and the centre of political agitation amidst the bodies of the authority and politicians.

Roman temples such as the Maison Carrée, Nimes (16 B.C.E.) (figure 6) were advised the home of the gods as Roman adoration played an important allotment of Roman society. Bodies went to temples to adoration and adjure to a aggregation of deities such as Jupiter, Juno, Venus and Mars amidst abounding another capital gods.

Figure 6: The Maison Carée, the Arenas and the Magne Tower in Nimes (Hubert Robert 1787)

The Roman theatre, amphitheatre and Hippodrome provided Roman association with an affluence of entertainment. Amphitheatres such as the Coliseum (figure 7) was the home of abandon presented in abounding forms. Ball ranged from antagonistic fights, executions, agrarian beastly fights and the casual argosy battles that appropriate the Coliseum to be flooded, in advanced of 50,000 assemblage from altered amusing classes abiding on stands that the Coliseum was able to house. Therefore, the Coliseum became a accessible comedy to a association that admired claret and could adjudge the fate of the also-ran but additionally reflected the amusing stratification of Roman society.

Figure 7: Colosseum: Cross-section (Granger 2014)

Whereas the Circus Maximus offered a altered affectionate of ball that was agent antagonism in advanced of a best accommodation 250,000 bodies that were as acclaimed as the contest captivated at the Coliseum. Even admitting association admired watching fights and races, however, some associates of the accessible were against to the abstraction of watching fighters die for ball at the Coliseum. Thus, the theatre was the ideal another to the Coliseum and the Circus Maximus, area plays were held.

Roman baths were advised as an capital claim for circadian activity in Rome. The Roman convenance of Bathing was initially a Greek tradition; that acquired acceptance amidst Roman association during the additional aeon B.C.E. Moreover, due to the acceptance that baths gained, it accent the claim for a centrally based ablution circuitous aural the burghal anatomy of every Roman burghal as added Roman cities began to emerge, epitomised by the burghal of Ablution that acquired its name for its Roman ablution complex.

By the aboriginal third aeon C.E., Eleven capital aqueducts supplied the burghal of Rome on boilerplate 190,000 cubic meters of baptize circadian to homes, accessible and clandestine baths, which had to be provided and broadcast via a arrangement of pipes fabricated from either adobe or lead. The channel in Segovia, Spain, congenital in the additional Aeon CE is still actuality acclimated today. Admitting the Pont du Gard that is allotment of the channel de Nimes (figure 8) is apparently admired by abounding architects and engineers as the best absorbing channel congenital by the Romans, continuing at a absolute acme of 48.77 metres, shows the accomplishment and complication that Roman engineers were able to attain.

Figure 8: Pont du Gard (Emanuele 2007)

Despite baptize actuality supplied to Roman baths and houses via a arrangement of pipes, fees were answerable in accordance to the pipe’s size, the beyond the pipe, the college the tax. Therefore, for claimed hygiene, Roman citizens went to bounded baths such as the baths of Caracalla (figure 9), accepted for its circuitous functionality, composure and immense size. Romans were able to bath for a baby fee; however, Roman baths additionally became areas of amusing altering area gatherings accounted and conversed about accepted contest or to altercate business affairs while accepting apple-pie at the aforementioned time.

Figure 9: The Baths Of Caracalla (Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema 1899)

Some Roman structures accept survived the analysis of time and still abide aural the burghal bolt today, abounding of these accept been changed, repurposed and modernised into burghal forms aural the burghal and accept contributed to the accumulation of cities. The Roman amphitheatre angry into a accessible annular aboveboard in Lucca, Diocletian alcazar that became the centre of Split in Croatia, which was a alcazar with walls that became the ‘downtown’ of the burghal back the collapse of the roman empire. Furthermore, balustrade Navona was congenital on the armpit of the amphitheater of Domitian, the amphitheatre and basilica accepting cogent access on Western architecture.

To achieve the Romans were a accessible association that adapted the bequest of Greek architectonics into their vision, a eyes angry into an art anatomy and embodied in abounding cities today. Despite Roman architectonics actuality about for millennia, it is one of the best affecting architectural styles that became a antecedent of afflatus for abounding architects throughout time.


Kuilman, M. (2010). QA596 – The burghal of Timgad in Algeria. [image] Available at: [Accessed 8 Jan. 2017].

Collony, P. and Dodge, H. (1998). Remains of a insula in the Capitol hill, in Rome (II aeon a. C.). Photography from CONNOLLY, Peter y DODGE, Hazel: La Ciudad Antigua. La vida en la Atenas y Roma clásicas, Madrid, 1998.. [image] Available at: [Accessed 8 Jan. 2017].

Bazzani, L. (1882). : A Pompeian Interior oil on console Dahesh Museum of Art. [image] Available at: [Accessed 8 Jan. 2017].

Twinningblog, (2008). Greek Theatre. [image] Available at: [Accessed 8 Jan. 2017].

Twinningblog, (2008). Roman theatre. [image] Available at: [Accessed 8 Jan. 2017].

Robert, H. (1787). The Maison Carée, the Arenas and the Magne Tower in Nimes. [image] Available at: [Accessed 8 Jan. 2017].

Granger, (2014). Colosseum: Cross-section. [image] Available at: [Accessed 8 Jan. 2017].

Emanuele, (2007). Pont du Gard. [image] Available at:[email protected]/1566294527 [Accessed 8 Jan. 2017].

Alma-Tadema, L. (1899). The Baths Of Caracalla. [image] Available at:!Large.jpg [Accessed 8 Jan. 2017].

Dudley, D. (1991). Roman society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Evans, G. (2017). Cultural planning : an burghal renaissance. London: Routledge.

Gates, C. (2004). The archaeology of burghal activity in the age-old Abreast East and Egypt, Greece, and Rome. London: Routledge.

Hodge, A. (2002). Roman aqueducts & baptize supply. London: Duckworth.

Kostof, S. and Richard, T. (1991). The Burghal Shaped: Burghal Patterns and Meanings Through History. London: Thames and Hudson.

Macaulay, D. (1975). City : A Story of Roman Planning and Construction. London: Collins.

Perez de Arce, R. (2017). Urban Transformations and the Architectonics of Additions. [ebook] London: Routledge, p.xvi-ii. Available at: [Accessed 3 Jan. 2017].

Rykwert, J. (1976). The abstraction of a town. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Vitruvius Pollio., Schofield, R. and Tavernor, R. (2009). On architecture. London: Penguin Books.

Watkin, D. (2009). The Roman Forum. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Wheeler, M. (1964). Roman art and architecture. London: Thames and Hudson.

Yourcenar, M. (2000). Memoirs of Hadrian. London: Penguin.

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal
Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp

Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code COURSEGUY