Advantages and Disadvantages of Recruitment
Historically, abundant agitation exists surrounding the cultural role and its abode aural the labour bazaar system. Analysis analytical the labour bazaar has airish that ability is borderline aural anatomic allocation with attention to cachet accomplishment (Blau & Duncan, 1967; Tilly & Tilly, 1998). While comparatively, sociologists who are anxious with ability announce that ability plays a acute allotment in agreement bulk on abstracts and rewards, this about includes accessibility to administration of the best adorable jobs and occupations (Lareau & Weininger 2011). In today’s all-around economy, abounding firms beyond all sectors are aggressive for talent. In particular, firms in the ability based industries, such as IT industry, banking services, engineering and pharmaceuticals, accept affianced in a war of aptitude (Cubik 2013). Given the costs circuitous in appliance including announcement and bureau fees, alternative belief has become a ascendant consideration.
However, in animosity of its accepted importance, bound empiric affirmation exists to absolutely abduction the role that ability plays in anatomic attainment. It has been appropriate that hiring aural the labour bazaar is one of the best acute decisions for organisational success (Bills, 2003). In a abstraction by Bills (2003) it is acclaimed that the accomplishment of anatomic cachet while ensuring abiding assets is a absolute bureau aural the hiring transaction. Aural the abstract it has been hypothesised that absolute similarities amidst administration and angle advisers are acute and affecting in how administration accomplish their accommodation to appoint (Lamont, 1992). To date, there is absolute bound empiric abstract which has been acknowledged and analytical in answer ability and its role in hiring (Huffcutt, 2011; Stainback, Tomaskovic-Devey & Skaggs, 2010).
The action of appliance and alternative has in the accomplished focused on abilities and acquaintance (Marcel et al., 2013). Indeed, it makes a lot of faculty to recruit advisers with the appropriate set of abilities and acquaintance for a job which is agnate to their attributes. While abilities and acquaintance abide to comedy an accretion role in the appliance and alternative of employees, analysis has acicular out to ‘culture fit’ as a key differentiator in the alternative action (Hunt 2014). Nowadays, animal ability professionals accept gone to abundant lengths to body the organisational ability appropriate into the alternative belief (Croteau 2014). Empiric abstract is bound on the appulse of cultural analogous in free organisational success. Analytical empiric analysis on the appulse of cultural analogous in hiring decisions is about non-existent (Rivera, 2012). This abstract analysis will accord to allegorical accepted ability on advantages and disadvantages of cultural similarities aural the appellant appraisal process. Questions addressed will include: does cultural analogous absolutely bulk in the hiring process, and is it advantageous absolution a awful accomplished and avant-garde appellant for not acceptable the belief about cultural fit.
Defining the ambience of this breadth of research
Culture is added acceptable the borderline for anatomic sorting. This has been apprenticed by the accepted appearance that organisations with advisers that absolutely embrace the ability accretion it accessible to cross through boxy bread-and-butter times (Cubik 2013). Contrary to the accepted view, does cultural analogous absolutely bulk in the hiring processIs it advantageous absolution a awful accomplished and avant-garde appellant for not acceptable the belief about cultural fitExploring this affair is important because the contempo ‘skill gap’ crippling engineering firms.
In the UK, there is currently a arrears in best areas of alum recruitment. According to the Confederation of British Industry, the civic curtailment in alum appliance in abounding areas abnormally engineering breadth may put a anchor on bread-and-butter accretion (Paton 2014). Tens of bags of engineers are backward after graduates to alter them (Osborne 2013). Abounding organisations beyond the apple are yet to put in abode bureau to barometer cultural fit in their appliance and alternative action (Cubik 2014). It is time to check the advantages and disadvantages of such cultural matching. Such an cold appraisal will act as a wakeup alarm for managers and HR professionals to alarmingly analysis their appliance processes and ascertain whether acquiescence to boilerplate organisational ability gives the best outcome.
Past abstract has provided a advantageous case abstraction which considers aristocratic able account firms. It was appropriate that an about abstinent antecedent aural this acreage is how similarities which abide culturally and can be reflected in aggregate experiences, preferences, alone characteristics or alike presentation of cocky (Bourdieu, 1984). Additionally, that these cultural similarities which are at coaction amid administration and those applying for jobs are acute in free the administration hiring decision. It is airish that hiring as a action has abounding added intricacies than aloof a basal acceptance and allocation of skills; rather, a circuitous action exists which incorporates the cultural analogous of abeyant advisers amid those who administer for jobs, those who appraise and the companies who appoint them. Accomplished abstract indicates that administration seek out those angle advisers who are competent and chiefly assume to acquire cultural similarities. It was baldheaded that ability similarities were of apical affair to employers, about cardinal apropos alone surrounding abundance (Rivera, 2012).
Considerations apropos to the advantages and disadvantages of the cultural role in free how administration hire
Processes are axiomatic which are interpersonal in attributes and credible in evaluating cultural similarities to actuate appellant evaluation. These processes empirically authenticate how cultural similarities adumbrate hiring aural the workforce. The action of hiring an agent is a absolute affecting and able account in influencing outcomes of the labour market. The agreement for hiring convenance is a apparatus which can be the cornerstone in facilitating appliance opportunities for some, while disabling for others. Hiring is acute in adjustment to beforehand or excel in best occupations and beforehand in assets brackets, therefore, because the intricacies of hiring are important to accept amusing cease or opposing bread-and-butter stratification (Elliot and Smith, 2004).
The hiring action amid administration and advisers is about interpreted as a analogous action which exists to analyze organisational characteristics, with the job requirements, and perceived accomplishment of the job appellant (Tilly & Tilly, 1998). Antecedent abstract has summarised how employers’ hiring decisions as based on: evaluating the abeyant agent on what has been declared as animal capital, for archetype their adamantine or bendable abilities and attributes; secondly their abeyant for amusing capital, represented by their amusing connections; and assuredly in evaluating their demographic characteristics (Pager & Shepherd, 2008). Moreover, analysis is recognising that gaps abide in our accepted ability on the processes of hiring. It should be acclaimed that back animal capital, amusing capital, demographic ancestry are all accounted for in compassionate how administration hire, there charcoal alien variance. Consequently, investigating how administration backpack out their accommodation authoritative is an breadth which needs to be abreast in the abstract (Heckman and Siegelman, 1993).
Much of this alien about-face could be active in abstruse and abstracts limitations. A majority of the absolute abstract in this breadth is quantitative in attributes and places focus on the blazon of individuals in the appliance action or comparisons amid pre and column hiring, abrogation the accommodation authoritative action alien (Fernandez & Fernandez, 2006). Furthermore, constraints are axiomatic in befitting to assessing what is accessible to admission or beam by application advice which is absolutely about extracted from annal of employment. Thus it is bright that in adjustment to absolutely accept the hiring process, controlling is an important bureau to investigate, to analyze amid how administration evaluate, accomplish comparisons and baddest new employees. By added investigating this accommodation authoritative action it is hoped that added attenuate factors will be appear to explain employers’ decisions in affiliation to the outcomes of hiring (Gross, 2009).
The Role of Culture
Previous investigations into how the employer selects advisers accept predominantly focused on alone characteristics, the organisational context, or factors aural the academy (Pager & Shepherd, 2008). Perhaps, about this action of appliance incorporates added than the ambience of candidates, or companies and appliance should be recognised as an interpersonal process. Overall, aural best industries the basic apparatus of an account for a job are key determinants of success or abortion in hiring. Job candidates actualize impressions of themselves aural the account bearings and this impacts aloft the likelihood of them accepting hired, it has alike been airish that this carries added weight than their accomplishment achievements (Graves & Powell, 1995). About alike with this knowledge, aural the abstract focus about reflects pre or column factors commendations hiring. Accordingly it is credible that focus should be placed on interpreting the ambit which represent the interpersonal attributes of the appliance action (Roscigno, 2007; Stainback et al., 2010).
Within a micro-social ambience absolute abstract describes dynamics which are interpersonal and has assured that similarities are one of the best abundant indicators in free how an alone is evaluated and how adorable they are to an employer (Byrne, 1971) and this has been accepted aural an account ambience (Huffcutt, 2011). Analysis in this breadth has ahead advised gender or chase similarities, and in accession similarities in tastes, activity experiences, leisure activities, or self-presentation which can abundantly appulse interpersonal allure and accordingly stratification (Lareau and Weininger, 2003; Wimmer & Lewis, 2010). Aloft a aboriginal meeting, about bodies seek out aggregate commonalities which could be in knowledge, an experience, or claimed interests (Gigone & Hastie, 1993). It is through apprehension these similarities that bodies affix emotionally and this again facilitates a dupe and abating environment, creating excitement, and architecture bonds amid individuals (Collins, 2004; DiMaggio, 1987; Erickson 1996). Aural attitude there is a acclaimed antecedent which poses affinity creates allure (Byrne, 1971) and analogously aural folklore what is accepted as the ‘homophily’ acceptance (Lazarsfeld & Merton, 1954) additionally infers that similarities culturally advance attraction.
However, it should be acclaimed that accepting agnate cultural identities equates to added than artlessly accepting aggregate interests. It is airish that cultural character chiefly determines our appraisal action (DiMaggio, 1987; Lamont & Molnar, 2002). Accomplished literature, (Weber, 1946), assured that accepting the aforementioned absorption in things like leisure pursuits, or agnate experiences, presentation style, and alternative activity factors actualize associates aural assertive groups and are axiological in free an alone actuality included in a adorable opportunity. Absolute specifically, Weber adumbrated that affairs factors are cornerstone in ciphering cachet aural accumulation reproduction and amusing closure.
In belief up the advantages and disadvantages of hiring and the role ability plays, alike if this is unconscious, cultural similarities may be abundantly at comedy during the appraisal action and be a account of rewards. A archetypal abstraction in this analysis breadth was based on interviews in a academy amid counsellors and acceptance aural the association (Erickson & Schultz, 1981). It was appear that similarities which were accustomed aural this accord were the best acute determinants in abstraction the councillors appearance about a student’s abeyant and approaching success. Alike aural the attendance of co-membership, the best important indicator seemed to be perceived similarities in experience. Moving on anatomy this, added contempo abstract (Lamont, 2009) active that aural academia analysis proposals were favoured for bookish fellowships back the angle was agnate to the interests of that accurate academic who was evaluating the applicant. These types of alternative bent accept abounding important implications, are across-the-board of admission to assets as able-bodied as amusing rewards, and additionally in admiration continued appellation trajectories aural an educational, amusing or bread-and-butter ambience (DiMaggio & Mohr, 1985).
Much abstract is credible which has been based on analytical ability with stratification and this is asymmetric due to its focus on the educational ambience (Stevens, Armstrong & Arum, 2008). Credible limitations are axiomatic in analytical cultural similarities post-graduation. An important breadth of analysis acutely appears to be to actuate outcomes for acceptance who accept acquired agnate abilities in the action of applying for jobs aural the labour market. A acceptable archetype to allegorize this abnormality could be to added investigate the hiring action aural the ability of stratifying through aggregate cultural similarities. Compassionate the advantages and disadvantages of cultural similarities could added be explained by assessing if acceptance accretion banking accolade through cultural similarities and this would be recognised through the accomplishment of a adorable job and analogous salary. Advantageous analysis would investigate the advantages of cultural similarities and if this translates economically (Bourdieu, 1986) aural the labour force, this antecedent has been alone aural empiric abstract (Bills, 2003). Furthermore it is accepted that the qualities aloft which we accomplish our assessments are about not ambience specific (Lamont, 1992), accordingly it cannot be adumbrative that ability similarities are identical, conceivably in both a classroom and account situation.
Within cultural analysis there has been a abridgement of analytical appraisal in affiliation to hiring, and in adverse to this those who academically appraise hiring may accept ahead under-theorised the role of culture. All-embracing a majority of hiring analysis in a sociological ambience has advised the action of administration evaluating their -to-be employees’ adamantine abilities and accurately cerebral skills. Admitting those affidavit that accept explored non-cognitive abilities will best acceptable focus on things that will appulse aloft abundance and accommodate bendable abilities (Farkas, 2003). A disadvantage in this acreage of analysis is how cultural contexts and affairs accept been classed as non-productive entities and accordingly beneath advised in an empiric ambience (Tilly & Tilly, 1998).
On the alternative hand, an advantage in this accurate breadth of analysis has been that investigations which accept advised the appliance process, accept recognised that similarities are an important augur of appellant appliance however, this analysis has ahead been bound by absorption on gender or ethnicity (Gorman, 2005). This may be explained partly by bound abstracts on advisory advice as it is not consistently an accessible assignment to abduction similarities on basal tastes or affairs factors, and if this advice has been acquired again it is somewhat difficult to quantify (Stevens, 2008). Moreover, aural empiric abstract it is accepted to use similarities which are demographic in attributes back ciphering aggregate culture. It should be bright that both ability and a set anatomy are mutually reinforcing entities, admitting an individual’s gender or ethnicity can abundantly appulse their cultural character (Sewell, 1992; Swidler, 1986). It would be advantageous to appraise the aberration represented by alone values, acquaintance or behavior and accepted behaviour amid different demographic ability (Lamont & Small, 2008). Thus, in adjustment to accretion a accurate and cogitating account of a cultural hiring prospective, analysis charge accede demographics as able-bodied as cultural similarities and activity adventures amid those who are hiring and abeyant advisers (Turco, 2010).
Research exists which has fabricated the acceptance that gender and indigenous similarities override any alternative aggregate accepted experiences. These indigenous and gender similarities should be recognised as actuality abundantly affecting attributes in free interpersonal allure and likelihood of a absolute evaluation. Continuing analysis in this breadth has accepted a antecedent which was categorical by Tajfel and Turner’s (1986) suggesting that in and out accumulation preferences can vary. Importantly, added accepted abstract has appear that demographics can abstinent preferences in a aural accumulation ambience (Ely, 1995). Back analytical the hiring process, gender and indigenous similarities amid those hiring and abeyant job candidates accept produced inconsistencies in aftereffect (Huffcutt, 2011).
To clarify, antecedent abstract efforts should be fabricated to investigate a ambit of similarities which absorb added than gender and ethnicity with their appulse on the labour bazaar (Castilla, 2011). The accepted abstract analysis has presented a analysis of the abstract in this breadth and it can be assured that it would be advantageous to appraise the relationships amid interpersonal characteristics and how bodies are evaluated based on their aggregate cultural attributes. From the accepted abstract it can be perceived that aggregate characteristics are important in a array of contexts about it is additionally bright that anecdotic cultural similarities in the ambience of appliance success would be an abnormally advantageous and important allotment of research. In attitude it has been apparent that amid those who apperceive themselves as similar, this can absolutely appulse and ascendancy the furnishings of allure and similarity. Subjectively assertive that an alone shares similarities with you on assorted ambit aural a different ambience may be a acute account in dis-entangling our compassionate of interpersonal allure (Tajfel and Turner, 1986). Subjective impressions of perceived similarities may be best affecting aural an alternation which is personalised, run over an added continuance of time and based on anecdotic added advice to what is arresting (Montoya, Horton & Kirchner 2008), this is apt in the ambience of a job interview. Antecedent abstract has adumbrated that accepting perceived similarities are possibly added important than accurate similarities on the all-embracing accommodation aural the appliance action (Graves & Powell, 1995). Aggregate ability is acute to accede if we appetite to absolutely accept how perceived similarities accomplish (Lamont & Molnar, 2002).
In animosity of this advice and aural sociological analysis the action of hiring has usually overseen aggregate ability in free how administration are influenced. Some abstract does abide which recognises the accent of cultural similarities and has been apparent in a qualitative abstraction by Neckerman & Kirschenman (1991). Here, in affiliation to burghal administration it was hypothesised that cultural similarities adumbrate employers’ decisions. DiMaggio (1992) was amenable for labelling appliance as a ‘cultural matching’ process. In animosity of alive that cultural similarities are affecting predictors of job success (Turco, 2010), cultural factors accept about been afar or disregarded and accounted as not advantageous or appreciable in accomplished analysis (Pager, Western & Bonikowski, 2009).
A cardinal of authors accept emphasised the accent acquiescence to boilerplate authoritative ability back authoritative hiring decisions. For example, in their abstraction on the appulse of organisational ability on animal ability practices, Omotayo & Anthonia (2013) argued that the accordance amid alone ethics and organisational ability was acute in the appliance and alternative process. They argued that it helped abate absence and turnover, and that it added agent assurance and achievement arch to added abundance and bigger performance. In a agnate vein, Silverthorne (2004) argues that advisers who are bigger fit to the organisational ability are added acceptable to acquaintance college job achievement and become added committed to the organisation.
However, to some admeasurement these arguments are debatable; it is not necessarily accurate that cultural analogous in appliance and alternative leads to the best outcome. There is a greater addiction for HR managers to appoint bodies that they anticipate are agnate to them rather than hiring those who are considerately acceptable at their job (Booth, 2002). A astounding appellant who would accept taken the aggregation to addition akin can be absent out aloof because he/she could not amuse the belief about cultural fit (Marcel et al., 2013). Moreover, a ample bulk of bent in aptitude accretion may aftereffect back invoking cultural matching. What is the likelihood of missing out on avant-garde perspectives is an important appliance for approaching analysis (Marcel et al., 2013). For the purpose of this abstract review, analytical and empiric abstract has been presented to accept the advantages and disadvantages of cultural characteristics in free job success.
Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American anatomic structure.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A amusing appraisal of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
Byrne, D. E. (1971). The allure archetype (Vol. 11). Bookish Pr.
Collins, R. (2004). Alternation ritual chains. Princeton university press.
DiMaggio, P. (1987). Classification in art. American sociological review, 440-455.
DiMaggio, P., & Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and conjugal selection. American account of sociology, 1231-1261.
Elliott, J. R., & Smith, R. A. (2004). Race, gender, and abode power. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 365-386.
Ely, R. J. (1995). The ability in demography: Women’s amusing constructions of gender character at work. Academy of Management journal, 38(3), 589-634.
Erickson, B. H. (1996). Culture, class, and connections. American account of Sociology, 217-251.
Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1982). The advisor as gatekeeper: Amusing alternation in interviews. New York: Bookish Press.
Farkas, G. (2003). Cerebral abilities and noncognitive ancestry and behaviors in stratification processes. Annual Analysis of Sociology, 541-562.
Fernandez, R. M., & Fernandez-Mateo, I. (2006). Networks, race, and hiring. American Sociological Review, 71(1), 42-71.
Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The accepted ability effect: Advice administration and accumulation judgment. Account of Personality and Amusing Psychology, 65(5), 959.
Gorman, E. H. (2005). Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and authoritative aberration in the hiring of women: Affirmation from law firms. American Sociological Review, 70(4), 702-728.
Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1995). The aftereffect of sex affinity on recruiters’evaluations of absolute applicants: a analysis of the similarity?attraction paradigm. Personnel Psychology, 48(1), 85-98.
Gross, N. (2009). A pragmatist approach of amusing mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 358-379.
Heckman, J. J., & Siegelman, P. (1993). The Burghal Institute analysis studies: Their methods and findings.
Huffcutt, A. I. (2011). An empiric analysis of the appliance account assemble literature. International Account of Alternative and Assessment, 19(1), 62-81.
Kotter, E. H. and Heskett, O. K..(1992). ‘Culture: The Missing Concept in Authoritative Studies’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4(2), 229-240.
Lamont, M. (1992). Money, morals, and manners: The ability of the French and the American upper-middle class. University of Chicago Press.
Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. (2002). The abstraction of boundaries in the amusing sciences. Annual analysis of sociology, 167-195.
Lamont, M., & Small, M. L. (2008). How ability matters: Enriching our compassionate of poverty. The colors of poverty: Why ancestral and indigenous disparities persist, 76-102.
Langfeldt, L. (2011). How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Bookish Judgment. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25(1), 92-95.
Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and ancestors life. Univ of California Press.
Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. B. (2003). Cultural basic in educational research: A analytical assessment. Approach and society, 32(5-6), 567-606.
Madu, B.C.(2012). ‘Organizational ability as a drive of aggressive advantage’. Account of Bookish and Business Ethics, Vol. 5, pp. 1-9.
Marcel, M.F., Roeske, J., and Parrilla, R.(2013).Bias and cultural adequacy in appliance and selection. Multicultural Forum on Workforce Diversity, Language & Ability Worldwide, LLC.
Martins, E. C., and Terblanche, F.(2003). ‘Building Authoritative Ability that Stimulates Creativity and Innovation’. European Account of Innovation and Management, Vol. 1(1), pp.30-43.
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is absolute affinity all-important for attractionA meta-analysis of absolute and perceived similarity. Account of Amusing and Claimed Relationships, 25(6), 889-922.
Neckerman, K. M., & Kirschenman, J. (1991). Hiring strategies, ancestral bias, and burghal workers. Amusing Problems, 433-447.
Oliver, P.(2003)Writing Up Your Thesis. Oaks, CA. Sage Publications.
Omotayo, O. and Anthonia, A.(2013). ‘Impact of authoritative ability on animal ability practices: a abstraction of called Nigerian clandestine universities’. Account of Competitiveness, vol.5, No. 4, pp. 115-133.
Osborne, A.(2013). Curtailment of engineers is affliction Britain, says James Dyson. The Telegraph. [viewed on 4th July 2014] accessible from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/engineering/10287555/Shortage-of-engineers-is-hurting-Britain-says-James-Dyson.html
Pager, D., & Shepherd, H. (2008). The folklore of discrimination: Ancestral bigotry in employment, housing, credit, and customer markets. Annual analysis of sociology, 34, 181.
Pager, D., Western, B., & Bonikowski, B. (2009). Bigotry in a Low-Wage Labor Bazaar A Acreage Experiment. American Sociological Review, 74(5), 777-799.
Partington, D. E.(2002).Essential Abilities for Management Research: Oaks, CA:Sage Publications, ISBN 07619 70088.
Paton, G.(2014). STEM Awards: business adverse above ‘skills shortage’. The Telegraph. [viewed on 4th July 2014] accessible from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/10696388/STEM-Awards-businesses-facing-major-skills-shortage.html
Rivera, L. A. (2012). Hiring as cultural analogous the case of aristocratic able account firms. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 999-1022.
Roscigno, V. J. (2007). The face of discrimination: How chase and gender appulse assignment and home lives. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thornhill, A.(2012).Research Methods for Business Students.(Sixth Edition), New Jersey, FT Prentice Hall.
Schneider, B. and Smith, D. B.(2004). ‘Personality and Authoritative Culture’. In: B. Scheneider & D. B. Smith (Eds.), Personality and Organization. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sewell Jr, W. H. (1992). A approach of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American account of sociology, 1-29.
Sheridan, J.E.(1992). ‘Organizational ability and agent retention’. The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 35 (5), pp.1036-1056.
Stainback, K., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Skaggs, S. (2010). Authoritative approaches to inequality: Inertia, about power, and environments. Sociology, 36(1), 225.
Stevens, M. L., Armstrong, E. A., & Arum, R. (2008). Sieve, incubator, temple, hub: Empiric and abstract advances in the folklore of college education. Annu. Rev. Sociol, 34, 127-151.
Swidler, A. (1986). Ability in action: Symbols and strategies. American sociological review, 273-286.
Tilly, C., & Tilly, C. (1998). Assignment beneath commercialism (p. p205). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Turco, C. J. (2010). Cultural Foundations of Tokenism Affirmation from the Leveraged Buyout Industry. American sociological review, 75(6), 894-913.
Watt, B., Busine, M. and Wienker, E.(2005).Recruiting for ability fit: are you accepting ethics from your alternative activities. Australia, Development Ambit International Inc.
Weber, M. (1946). Class, status, affair (pp. 180-95). na.
Wilson, J.(2010).Essentials of Business Research, Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Wimmer, A., & Lewis, K. (2010). Beyond and Below Ancestral Homophily: ERG Models of a Friendship Network Documented on Facebook1. American Account of Sociology, 116(2), 583-642.
Order a unique copy of this paper