Advance Nursing Research (Critiquing a Quantitative Study)
Critiquing a Quantitative Analysis Study.
You will be autograph a quantitative appraisal on one of the studies provided. You will alarmingly adjudge the abstraction in a paper.
Choose Only One of the Following Quantitative Account Articles:
da Silva João, A. L., & Saldanha Portelada, A. F. (2019). Mobbing and its Impact on interpersonal relationships at the workplace. Account of Interpersonal Violence, 34(13), 2797–2812.
Dokun-Mowete, C. A., Sharma, M., & Beatty, F. (2019). Using Multitheory Model to Predict Low-salt Intake Among Nigerian Adults Living with Hypertension. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 39(4), 245–255.
Kashyap, N., Krishnan, N., Kaur, S., & Ghai, S. (2019). Risk Factors of Cervical Cancer: A Case-Control Study. Asia-Pacific Account of Oncology Nursing, 6(3), 308–314.
- Read your called account commodity entirely.
- Analyze the account commodity and use the specific questions that are categorical in Gray, Grove, and Sutherland (2017) begin on pages 812 through 830 (See attachment, PDF e-book) to assemble your assay of your called quantitative analysis study.
These are the capital headers of your paper:
1- Identifying the Steps of the Quantitative Analysis Process
2- Determination of Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantitative Studies
3- Evaluating a Quantitative Study
You accept abounding questions to abode in this assignment. They should be in complete sentences (i.e., ammo point responses are not acceptable!).
- APA architecture is required.
- Page length, excluding the appellation and references list, is amid bristles and seven pages.
- Only appropriate to accept a minimum of 2 references.
- Free of appropriation (Turnitin assignment)
Note: You are not appropriate to draw framework abstraction maps and alternative images for this assignment.
The appointment is a Quantitative critique. Students charge to use the quantitative questions NOT the qualitative questions.
Order a unique copy of this paper