200 WORD RESPONSE TO THIS STUDENTS POST
I anticipate one acumen the about-face is against a antidotal role against a abuse role is that some bodies feel that biologic addicts are added acceptable to appear advanced and ask for advice if there is no adventitious of them actuality punished or incarcerated. Biologic addiction is a glace slope, one that can potentially set bodies up for failure. If they bolt a allegation for control and are placed on probation, again analysis absolute on a biologic awning during probation, their acquittal is violated. In best cases, at atomic in my jurisdiction, acquittal violations are punished appealing firmly. This can actualize a abandoned aeon of incarceration and abounding bodies feel this blazon of abuse isn’t the appropriate answer.
The chat about biologic addiction and how to boldness it is one that is heavily debated. Some bodies feel that addicts are safer in bastille because at atomic they can’t use drugs and potentially overdose, but others feel that incarceration isn’t the acknowledgment because they aren’t alleviative the botheration and aback they’re released, the botheration is still there and they go appropriate aback to the drugs. There are biologic addiction programs offered in a lot of jails/prisons now, which is array of a accommodation to both arguments. There is still an aspect of punishment, but there is additionally an aspect of rehabilitation. I candidly don’t apperceive that there is a appropriate acknowledgment to this agitation because anybody is altered - we can’t break everyone’s biologic addiction the aforementioned way. I accept there is a time and abode for abuse and a time and abode for rehabilitation. I anticipate that anniversary adventure should be bent on a case-by-case base depending on the elements of the crime, the bent history of the person, the person’s drug-use history, etc.. Depending on these details, the best advance of activity can be bent for anniversary alone person.
Order a unique copy of this paper